So, the people you claim are witnesses as the bandwagon. That your argument, that the assassination was real, hindges on.

You ignored the 3 point made in the video because you want me to trust that the "witnesses" watching the show unfold on stage are more reliable than slow motion frame by frame visual evidence of AI.

That's called cherry picking now? Ok, fine. I don't fucking care if you don't want to call ignoring information that goes against your current view cog dis. We can call it cherry pickin. Whatever.

You said I was wrong again, but looks like i haven't been wrong yet.

I'm going to now explain what I think the audience saw, but Im surprised you can speculate this basic theory yourself. The audience saw a fake assassination. Like watching a magic show, or a play, they saw some special effects and heard a gunshot.

And like the moon landing videos, totally stupid and easy to see how it was made in a studio, because people believe what is presented to them, they don't really think hard that it might be a fake. And the absolute fact that they control the narrative anyway, means they don't need to pay that much attention to the details, a few fringe "conspiracy theorists" that play it frame by frame are easily silenced. You really don't want to see a bigger picture? I don't get it. Then why say kirk is not real? That touches on a deeper theory that cannot be proven...but I digress.

"But the audience saw Charlie Kirk fall. And they saw blood. ". Well, actors pretend to die all the time. And there are blood packets that explode, all kinds of special effects.

But what about all the people on stage and the paramedics. Cabal tools, actors. They have thousands of them.

As for Charlie being here as a host, not a "real" person, I suppose you mean like trump, Elon, Putin, Obama, fucking Oprah and people like lady gaga...or anyone else in the main stream and political world. I agree they are at a level that we cannot Access, maybe not humans...but what then? Spirits? Another species that share our plane? How do you believe that works?

So, the people you claim are witnesses as the bandwagon. That your argument, that the assassination was real, hindges on.

You ignored the 3 point made in the video because you want me to trust that the "witnesses" watching the show unfold on stage are more reliable than slow motion frame by frame visual evidence of AI.

That's called cherry picking now? Ok, fine. I don't fucking care if you don't want to call ignoring information that goes against your current view cog dis. We can call it cherry pickin. Whatever.

You said I was wrong again, but looks like i haven't been wrong yet.

I'm going to now explain what I think the audience saw, but Im surprised you can speculate this basic theory yourself. The audience saw a fake assassination. Like watching a magic show, or a play, they saw some special effects and heard a gunshot.

And like the moon landing videos, totally stupid and easy to see how it was made in a studio, because people believe what is presented to them, they don't really think hard that it might be a fake. And the absolute fact that they control the narrative anyway, means they don't need to pay that much attention to the details, a few fringe "conspiracy theorists" that play it frame by frame are easily silenced. You really don't want to see a bigger picture? I don't get it. Then why saw he is not real? That touches on a deeper theory that cannot be proven...but I digress.

"But the audience saw Charlie Kirk fall. And they saw blood. ". Well, actors pretend to die all the time. And there are blood packets that explode, all kinds of special effects.

But what about all the people on stage and the paramedics. Cabal tools, actors. They have thousands of them.

As for Charlie being here as a host, not a real person, I suppose you mean like trump, Elon, or anyone else in the main stream political world. How do you believe that works?