Even if you put millions in advertising conspiracies.win, it would be cut off, shadow blocked or you'd be killed.

True. But to my understanding, it's a personal experience for anyone to wake up from the fake nightmare of propaganda, so probably winning 1 soul at a time is still worth it.

We cannot win, but more people can be saved.

Thank you for sharing your view on prison planet. I know how hard it can be to open up on a topic that is immediately mocked by 99% of the internet, so it grows harder and harder to speak about it. So I really appreciate your thoughts on this!

My personal experience is going from the prison planet model to flat earth. And I will share my reasoning there.

• You pointed out that flat earth is a CIA psy op. I know for a fact that the community, known as the flat earth society, is indeed a psy op. This was created to portray flat earthers as idiots, part of the mockingbird project.

• You also said, in your own words, that the Earth is flat, if I am not mistaken here:

"I'm sure we could figure it out, but as it stands, this beautiful place where you can experience massive joy and love, is flat, stationary and not a planet..."

So, I guess my question here is, why is the flat earth idea not accepted by you?

I understand why the popular flat earthers are idiots, and I understand that you don't want to be connected with them, but if you confirm that it is flat, why not be a normal flat earther, instead of the popular idiot flat earthers?

I do accept the flat earth idea, but not the flat earth model, not the popular flat earth idiotic ideas, etc.

However, I have reviewed so many documentaries to confirm this, so at this point I know it definitively. We can discuss that more in detail, if you want.

In regards to the prison planet idea, I also had that idea in mind, but found flat earth created by God to be more provable, including the fact that all these shitheads are fearing Jesus, and Christians, and definitely are satanists.

I can expand on the topic if you want some time.

But I have questions about the fence that you mentioned:

"...that herd learns they can bumb rush a fence..."

Can we really do it?

To my knowledge, and I can defend that if you want, I believe that the surrounding walls are made out of oxygen atoms.

Theoretically, how can we break the fence, while the only way to do it would be removing the oxygen? I just don't see this happening, but I could be wrong.

For example, project fishbowl (probably chosen because of the walls surrounding the Earth are like a fishbowl) has used so many nuclear heads supposedly to break the dome with no effect. They couldn't do it with nuclear explosions, so how can we achieve breaking the walls?

To mention why I believe that's a wall created by oxygen, I have several reasons:

• The ozone layer is provable due to weather balloons that can gather data from the upper atmosphere.

• Oxygen freezes at temperatures higher than what is believed space temperature to be like, so I like to easily disprove nasa theories using this easy experiment - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik9J9NgBhoc (2:57 min video)

• And also oxygen has certain properties when supercooled (if I can use this word).

• Oxygen is a gas, so when cooled, it will gather together into ozone. Normal oxygen atoms are floating in pairs O2, while ozone is O3.

• Ozone has diamagnetic properties that can be the reason for compasses to point in one direction. (That's a theory that I have).

"Ozone's O3 structure was determined in 1865. The molecule was later proven to have a bent structure and to be weakly diamagnetic." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone

• Now my favorite point: Ozone is violet-black solid in very low temperatures, which suggests the reason for the black sky at night, and light blue during the day.

"At temperatures below 80 K (−193.2 °C; −315.7 °F), it forms a violet-black solid.[28]" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone#Physical_properties

Unfortunately, wiki removed the part where Ozone in such low temperatures is semi-transparent, which could prove why stars are only seen at night time.

Well, these are my thoughts for now, I would be happy to further discuss the topic with you, if you want. Again, I appreciate your thoughts on the matter.

Even if you put millions in advertising conspiracies.win, it would be cut off, shadow blocked or you'd be killed.

True. But to my understanding, it's a personal experience for anyone to wake up from the fake nightmare of propaganda, so probably winning 1 soul at a time is still worth it.

We cannot win, but more people can be saved.

Thank you for sharing your view on prison planet. I know how hard it can be to open up on a topic that is immediately mocked by 99% of the internet, so it grows harder and harder to speak about it. So I really appreciate your thoughts on this!

My personal experience is going from the prison planet model to flat earth. And I will share my reasoning there.

• You pointed out that flat earth is a CIA psy op. I know for a fact that the community, known as the flat earth society, is indeed a psy op. This was created to portray flat earthers as idiots, part of the mockingbird project.

• You also said, in your own words, that the Earth is flat, if I am not mistaken here:

"I'm sure we could figure it out, but as it stands, this beautiful place where you can experience massive joy and love, is flat, stationary and not a planet..."

So, I guess my question here is, why is the flat earth idea not accepted by you?

I understand why the popular flat earthers are idiots, and I understand that you don't want to be connected with them, but if you confirm that it is flat, why not be a normal flat earther, instead of the popular idiot flat earthers?

I do accept the flat earth idea, but not the flat earth model, not the popular flat earth idiotic ideas, etc.

However, I have reviewed so many documentaries to confirm this, so at this point I know it definitively. We can discuss that more in detail, if you want.

In regards to the prison planet idea, I also had that idea in mind, but found flat earth created by God to be more provable, including the fact that all these shitheads are fearing Jesus, and Christians, and definitely are satanists.

I can expand on the topic if you want some time.

But I have questions about the fence that you mentioned:

"...that herd learns they can bumb rush a fence..."

Can we really do it?

To my knowledge, and I can defend that if you want, I believe that the surrounding walls are made out of oxygen atoms.

Theoretically, how can we break the fence, while the only way to do it would be removing the oxygen? I just don't see this happening, but I could be wrong.

For example, project fishbowl (probably chosen because of the walls surrounding the Earth are like a fishbowl) has used so many nuclear heads supposedly to break the dome with no effect. They couldn't do it with nuclear explosions, so how can we achieve breaking the walls?

To mention why I believe that's a wall created by oxygen, I have 3 reasons:

• The ozone layer is provable due to weather balloons that can gather data from the upper atmosphere.

• Oxygen freezes at temperatures higher than what is believed space temperature to be like, so I like to easily disprove nasa theories using this easy experiment - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik9J9NgBhoc (2:57 min video)

• And also oxygen has certain properties when supercooled (if I can use this word).

• Oxygen is a gas, so when cooled, it will gather together into ozone. Normal oxygen atoms are floating in pairs O2, while ozone is O3.

• Ozone has diamagnetic properties that can be the reason for compasses to point in one direction. (That's a theory that I have).

"Ozone's O3 structure was determined in 1865. The molecule was later proven to have a bent structure and to be weakly diamagnetic." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone

• Now my favorite point: Ozone is violet-black solid in very low temperatures, which suggests the reason for the black sky at night, and light blue during the day.

"At temperatures below 80 K (−193.2 °C; −315.7 °F), it forms a violet-black solid.[28]" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone#Physical_properties

Unfortunately, wiki removed the part where Ozone in such low temperatures is semi-transparent, which could prove why stars are only seen at night time.

Well, these are my thoughts for now, I would be happy to further discuss the topic with you, if you want. Again, I appreciate your thoughts on the matter.