[part 5]
what's the deal with this "law of attraction" you'd hear about on TV several years ago. Seems like these people were analyzing how karma works and they'd go, oh this is what goes on.. the way you have to be like the one infinite creator's vibe of "love/light" vibration. Be like that so there's no "distortion" in the vibe, then it doesn't have to do any "catalysts" to give you challenges.
However.. I betcha these "law of attraction" people, are cheating the way this works, so they can get a bunch of money. It's "service to self" this "law of attraction" and they don't do "service to others" when they get that bunch of money. So it's not "genuine".
The "Law of Attraction" is a philosophical concept often presented as a universal law, which posits that positive or negative thoughts bring positive or negative experiences into a person's life. The idea is that thoughts are a form of energy and that positive energy attracts success in all areas of life, including health, finances, and relationships. It became very popular in the early 2000s, largely due to the book and film "The Secret."
The core principles often promoted by proponents of the Law of Attraction include:
Like Attracts Like: This is the central tenet. The belief is that your thoughts and feelings, which are considered to be a form of vibrational energy, attract similar energies from the universe.
Manifesting: This is the practice of consciously using the Law of Attraction to bring desires into reality. It typically involves three steps: asking the universe for what you want, believing you will receive it, and then being open to receiving it.
Vibrational Alignment: The idea that you must be in a state of high vibration—a positive, joyful, or grateful emotional state—to attract what you desire. The concept you mentioned, "love/light vibration," aligns with this idea of being in a pure, high-frequency state.
Your observation about the potential for "cheating" and the conflict between "service to self" and "service to others" brings up a common critique of the Law of Attraction movement. While the core idea can be a tool for self-improvement and positive thinking, it's often criticized for a few key reasons:
Focus on Material Gain: Many popular interpretations of the Law of Attraction heavily emphasize using it to manifest material wealth and personal success. This can be seen as "service to self" and can clash with spiritual or ethical philosophies that prioritize community, altruism, or "service to others."
Victim-Blaming: A significant criticism is that it can lead to blaming people for their misfortune. If the Law of Attraction is absolute, then a person experiencing hardship (poverty, illness, etc.) could be seen as having "attracted" that negative experience through their own thoughts, which can be a deeply harmful and simplistic viewpoint.
Lack of Action: While most teachers of the Law of Attraction would say that action is necessary, some interpretations can lead to a passive waiting for things to happen, rather than a proactive approach to achieving goals. The idea that simply thinking about something is enough can be a form of escapism.
Commercialization: As you pointed out, the movement has been heavily commercialized. Many self-proclaimed gurus sell books, seminars, and coaching programs, leading to the perception that the primary motive is personal profit rather than genuinely helping others. This raises questions about whether the "love/light" philosophy is truly being embodied by those who profit from it.
The concepts you mentioned, like "distortion" and "catalysts," are more closely associated with a spiritual philosophy known as "The Law of One." This particular philosophy, which came from a series of channeled books, is where terms like "social memory complex," "service to self," and "service to others" originate. It presents a much more complex and nuanced cosmic framework than the popularized Law of Attraction. Within that specific philosophy, the idea of "service to self" is seen as a distinct and separate path from "service to others," and not just a "cheating" of the system, but a fundamental choice of spiritual orientation.
So, while the popularized Law of Attraction borrows some of the language and concepts of positive thinking and spiritual alignment, it often simplifies them and applies them to a material context, which can lead to the very ethical conflicts you've astutely identified.
==========================
See.. you got a problem here with this "law of attraction" bullshit.
"Vibrational Alignment: The idea that you must be in a state of high vibration—a positive, joyful, or grateful emotional state—to attract what you desire. The concept you mentioned, "love/light vibration," aligns with this idea of being in a pure, high-frequency state."
So you gotta go around like this.. fuck that. That's what I was saying about trying to go with this shit.. you have to be cheery, eh. Meanwhile, look at how twisted Monad is with all this. Where he's punishing people who are already having problems. But he's preaching that, oh yeah.. i'm love/light and you have to be service to others. But what does he do.. he's kicking them when they're down and giving them more bullshit to deal with when they're already maxed out.
But yeah I looked up this movie..
THE SECRET: Law of Attraction FULL MOVIE (2006) 1hr28min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHmJbQGWry8
I'm gonna check this shit out today and see how much bullshit it is. lol
[part 5]
what's the deal with this "law of attraction" you'd hear about on TV several years ago. Seems like these people were analyzing how karma works and they'd go, oh this is what goes on.. the way you have to be like the one infinite creator's vibe of "love/light" vibration. Be like that so there's no "distortion" in the vibe, then it doesn't have to do any "catalysts" to give you challenges.
However.. I betcha these "law of attraction" people, are cheating the way this works, so they can get a bunch of money. It's "service to self" this "law of attraction" and they don't do "service to others" when they get that bunch of money. So it's not "genuine".
The "Law of Attraction" is a philosophical concept often presented as a universal law, which posits that positive or negative thoughts bring positive or negative experiences into a person's life. The idea is that thoughts are a form of energy and that positive energy attracts success in all areas of life, including health, finances, and relationships. It became very popular in the early 2000s, largely due to the book and film "The Secret."
The core principles often promoted by proponents of the Law of Attraction include:
Like Attracts Like: This is the central tenet. The belief is that your thoughts and feelings, which are considered to be a form of vibrational energy, attract similar energies from the universe.
Manifesting: This is the practice of consciously using the Law of Attraction to bring desires into reality. It typically involves three steps: asking the universe for what you want, believing you will receive it, and then being open to receiving it.
Vibrational Alignment: The idea that you must be in a state of high vibration—a positive, joyful, or grateful emotional state—to attract what you desire. The concept you mentioned, "love/light vibration," aligns with this idea of being in a pure, high-frequency state.
Your observation about the potential for "cheating" and the conflict between "service to self" and "service to others" brings up a common critique of the Law of Attraction movement. While the core idea can be a tool for self-improvement and positive thinking, it's often criticized for a few key reasons:
Focus on Material Gain: Many popular interpretations of the Law of Attraction heavily emphasize using it to manifest material wealth and personal success. This can be seen as "service to self" and can clash with spiritual or ethical philosophies that prioritize community, altruism, or "service to others."
Victim-Blaming: A significant criticism is that it can lead to blaming people for their misfortune. If the Law of Attraction is absolute, then a person experiencing hardship (poverty, illness, etc.) could be seen as having "attracted" that negative experience through their own thoughts, which can be a deeply harmful and simplistic viewpoint.
Lack of Action: While most teachers of the Law of Attraction would say that action is necessary, some interpretations can lead to a passive waiting for things to happen, rather than a proactive approach to achieving goals. The idea that simply thinking about something is enough can be a form of escapism.
Commercialization: As you pointed out, the movement has been heavily commercialized. Many self-proclaimed gurus sell books, seminars, and coaching programs, leading to the perception that the primary motive is personal profit rather than genuinely helping others. This raises questions about whether the "love/light" philosophy is truly being embodied by those who profit from it.
The concepts you mentioned, like "distortion" and "catalysts," are more closely associated with a spiritual philosophy known as "The Law of One." This particular philosophy, which came from a series of channeled books, is where terms like "social memory complex," "service to self," and "service to others" originate. It presents a much more complex and nuanced cosmic framework than the popularized Law of Attraction. Within that specific philosophy, the idea of "service to self" is seen as a distinct and separate path from "service to others," and not just a "cheating" of the system, but a fundamental choice of spiritual orientation.
So, while the popularized Law of Attraction borrows some of the language and concepts of positive thinking and spiritual alignment, it often simplifies them and applies them to a material context, which can lead to the very ethical conflicts you've astutely identified.
==========================
See.. you got a problem here with this "law of attraction" bullshit.
"Vibrational Alignment: The idea that you must be in a state of high vibration—a positive, joyful, or grateful emotional state—to attract what you desire. The concept you mentioned, "love/light vibration," aligns with this idea of being in a pure, high-frequency state."
So you gotta go around like this.. fuck that. That's what I was saying about trying to go with this shit.. you have to be cheery, eh. Meanwhile, look at how twisted Monad is with all this. Where he's punishing people who are already having problems. But he's preaching that, oh yeah.. i'm love/light and you have to be service to others. But what does he do.. he's kicking them when they're down and giving them more bullshit to deal with when they're already maxed out.
[part 5]
what's the deal with this "law of attraction" you'd hear about on TV several years ago. Seems like these people were analyzing how karma works and they'd go, oh this is what goes on.. the way you have to be like the one infinite creator's vibe of "love/light" vibration. Be like that so there's no "distortion" in the vibe, then it doesn't have to do any "catalysts" to give you challenges.
However.. I betcha these "law of attraction" people, are cheating the way this works, so they can get a bunch of money. It's "service to self" this "law of attraction" and they don't do "service to others" when they get that bunch of money. So it's not "genuine".
The "Law of Attraction" is a philosophical concept often presented as a universal law, which posits that positive or negative thoughts bring positive or negative experiences into a person's life. The idea is that thoughts are a form of energy and that positive energy attracts success in all areas of life, including health, finances, and relationships. It became very popular in the early 2000s, largely due to the book and film "The Secret."
The core principles often promoted by proponents of the Law of Attraction include:
Like Attracts Like: This is the central tenet. The belief is that your thoughts and feelings, which are considered to be a form of vibrational energy, attract similar energies from the universe.
Manifesting: This is the practice of consciously using the Law of Attraction to bring desires into reality. It typically involves three steps: asking the universe for what you want, believing you will receive it, and then being open to receiving it.
Vibrational Alignment: The idea that you must be in a state of high vibration—a positive, joyful, or grateful emotional state—to attract what you desire. The concept you mentioned, "love/light vibration," aligns with this idea of being in a pure, high-frequency state.
Your observation about the potential for "cheating" and the conflict between "service to self" and "service to others" brings up a common critique of the Law of Attraction movement. While the core idea can be a tool for self-improvement and positive thinking, it's often criticized for a few key reasons:
Focus on Material Gain: Many popular interpretations of the Law of Attraction heavily emphasize using it to manifest material wealth and personal success. This can be seen as "service to self" and can clash with spiritual or ethical philosophies that prioritize community, altruism, or "service to others."
Victim-Blaming: A significant criticism is that it can lead to blaming people for their misfortune. If the Law of Attraction is absolute, then a person experiencing hardship (poverty, illness, etc.) could be seen as having "attracted" that negative experience through their own thoughts, which can be a deeply harmful and simplistic viewpoint.
Lack of Action: While most teachers of the Law of Attraction would say that action is necessary, some interpretations can lead to a passive waiting for things to happen, rather than a proactive approach to achieving goals. The idea that simply thinking about something is enough can be a form of escapism.
Commercialization: As you pointed out, the movement has been heavily commercialized. Many self-proclaimed gurus sell books, seminars, and coaching programs, leading to the perception that the primary motive is personal profit rather than genuinely helping others. This raises questions about whether the "love/light" philosophy is truly being embodied by those who profit from it.
The concepts you mentioned, like "distortion" and "catalysts," are more closely associated with a spiritual philosophy known as "The Law of One." This particular philosophy, which came from a series of channeled books, is where terms like "social memory complex," "service to self," and "service to others" originate. It presents a much more complex and nuanced cosmic framework than the popularized Law of Attraction. Within that specific philosophy, the idea of "service to self" is seen as a distinct and separate path from "service to others," and not just a "cheating" of the system, but a fundamental choice of spiritual orientation.
So, while the popularized Law of Attraction borrows some of the language and concepts of positive thinking and spiritual alignment, it often simplifies them and applies them to a material context, which can lead to the very ethical conflicts you've astutely identified.