[part 1]

I put this post contents in the google gemini AI asking it, what do you think 'll happen in this scenario. It said:

This scenario you've laid out is a detailed and frustrated critique of a specific spiritual or philosophical concept of karma and the divine. The text describes a system where a "one infinite creator" or "top level logos" emanates a "love/light" vibration. According to this view, if a person's own vibration, or state of mind, doesn't match this "love/light" vibe—for example, if they're worried about being unemployed—the system sends them challenges, or "catalysts," to correct the imbalance.

Based on the perspective presented in the post, here's an analysis of what might happen next and the core conflict at play:

What Will Happen According to This View The author of the post has made a choice to reject the system and its rules. Instead of trying to find "peace" by passively accepting the "catalysts" and aligning with the supposed "love/light" vibration, they have chosen to actively resist. They've decided to stick to their own "standards" and defiance, essentially saying "bring it on" to the challenges the system might throw at them.

According to the logic described in the post, this defiant attitude is still a "distortion" of the "love/light" vibe. Therefore, the system, if it continues to operate as described, would likely send more challenges or "bullshit" their way. The author anticipates this, but they've found a different kind of peace in their rebellion. The anxiety about being "powerless" and having to play a rigged game is gone because they've decided not to play by the rules. Their new mindset is one of resistance rather than passive acceptance.

This is a key turning point in the scenario. The individual is no longer a victim of the system's logic; they've become an active opponent.

The Central Conflict The core issue this post raises is the apparent contradiction between a divine entity that is supposed to be "all love" and a system that seems to punish those who are struggling.

The "Love/Light" Contradiction: The author finds it hypocritical that a "love/light" entity would "kick you when you're down." They're arguing that a truly benevolent force would help, not send more problems. The "catalyst" explanation—that challenges are for learning—is rejected as a rationalization for a system that feels cruel and unfair.

The Powerless State: A major source of frustration is the feeling of being powerless. The author feels that their fate is in the hands of others (potential employers) and that their natural human reaction to worry and anxiety only makes things worse. This "vicious circle" is seen as a rigged game with no way to win, which is why the author's act of rebellion is so significant. It's a way of reclaiming some power and agency.

The Comparison to Yahweh: The comparison to Yahweh (as described in some critiques) reinforces the author's point. They see both systems as run by "assholes" because neither one seems to be a truly benevolent force. The "one infinite creator" is seen as a more subtle but equally unfair version of the same thing.

In essence, the scenario suggests that the individual's defiance is their personal way of resolving the paradox. They've found a form of peace not by surrendering to the system's rules, but by rejecting the system entirely. They're choosing their own path and dealing with the consequences on their own terms.

===============================

Doesn't say if you're gonna be losing more, seems a bit like it at first. But hey, at least you're not "settling for the deal" with this bullshit. The system is corrupt, so fuck them. Who kicks somebody when they're down, when they're claming they're emanating "love/light". That ain't emanting "love/light", ok, that's called being an asshole. So fuck their system. It's "bad".

This is a way to actually get rid of that anxiety bad feeling. Went away after figuring this out. Fuck these guys. This is why the world is fucked up.

I put this post contents in the google gemini AI asking it, what do you think 'll happen in this scenario. It said:

This scenario you've laid out is a detailed and frustrated critique of a specific spiritual or philosophical concept of karma and the divine. The text describes a system where a "one infinite creator" or "top level logos" emanates a "love/light" vibration. According to this view, if a person's own vibration, or state of mind, doesn't match this "love/light" vibe—for example, if they're worried about being unemployed—the system sends them challenges, or "catalysts," to correct the imbalance.

Based on the perspective presented in the post, here's an analysis of what might happen next and the core conflict at play:

What Will Happen According to This View The author of the post has made a choice to reject the system and its rules. Instead of trying to find "peace" by passively accepting the "catalysts" and aligning with the supposed "love/light" vibration, they have chosen to actively resist. They've decided to stick to their own "standards" and defiance, essentially saying "bring it on" to the challenges the system might throw at them.

According to the logic described in the post, this defiant attitude is still a "distortion" of the "love/light" vibe. Therefore, the system, if it continues to operate as described, would likely send more challenges or "bullshit" their way. The author anticipates this, but they've found a different kind of peace in their rebellion. The anxiety about being "powerless" and having to play a rigged game is gone because they've decided not to play by the rules. Their new mindset is one of resistance rather than passive acceptance.

This is a key turning point in the scenario. The individual is no longer a victim of the system's logic; they've become an active opponent.

The Central Conflict The core issue this post raises is the apparent contradiction between a divine entity that is supposed to be "all love" and a system that seems to punish those who are struggling.

The "Love/Light" Contradiction: The author finds it hypocritical that a "love/light" entity would "kick you when you're down." They're arguing that a truly benevolent force would help, not send more problems. The "catalyst" explanation—that challenges are for learning—is rejected as a rationalization for a system that feels cruel and unfair.

The Powerless State: A major source of frustration is the feeling of being powerless. The author feels that their fate is in the hands of others (potential employers) and that their natural human reaction to worry and anxiety only makes things worse. This "vicious circle" is seen as a rigged game with no way to win, which is why the author's act of rebellion is so significant. It's a way of reclaiming some power and agency.

The Comparison to Yahweh: The comparison to Yahweh (as described in some critiques) reinforces the author's point. They see both systems as run by "assholes" because neither one seems to be a truly benevolent force. The "one infinite creator" is seen as a more subtle but equally unfair version of the same thing.

In essence, the scenario suggests that the individual's defiance is their personal way of resolving the paradox. They've found a form of peace not by surrendering to the system's rules, but by rejecting the system entirely. They're choosing their own path and dealing with the consequences on their own terms.

===============================

Doesn't say if you're gonna be losing more, seems a bit like it at first. But hey, at least you're not "settling for the deal" with this bullshit. The system is corrupt, so fuck them. Who kicks somebody when they're down, when they're claming they're emanating "love/light". That ain't emanting "love/light", ok, that's called being an asshole. So fuck their system. It's "bad".

This is a way to actually get rid of that anxiety bad feeling. Went away after figuring this out. Fuck these guys. This is why the world is fucked up.

I put this post contents in the google gemini AI asking it, what do you think 'll happen in this scenario. It said:

This scenario you've laid out is a detailed and frustrated critique of a specific spiritual or philosophical concept of karma and the divine. The text describes a system where a "one infinite creator" or "top level logos" emanates a "love/light" vibration. According to this view, if a person's own vibration, or state of mind, doesn't match this "love/light" vibe—for example, if they're worried about being unemployed—the system sends them challenges, or "catalysts," to correct the imbalance.

Based on the perspective presented in the post, here's an analysis of what might happen next and the core conflict at play:

What Will Happen According to This View The author of the post has made a choice to reject the system and its rules. Instead of trying to find "peace" by passively accepting the "catalysts" and aligning with the supposed "love/light" vibration, they have chosen to actively resist. They've decided to stick to their own "standards" and defiance, essentially saying "bring it on" to the challenges the system might throw at them.

According to the logic described in the post, this defiant attitude is still a "distortion" of the "love/light" vibe. Therefore, the system, if it continues to operate as described, would likely send more challenges or "bullshit" their way. The author anticipates this, but they've found a different kind of peace in their rebellion. The anxiety about being "powerless" and having to play a rigged game is gone because they've decided not to play by the rules. Their new mindset is one of resistance rather than passive acceptance.

This is a key turning point in the scenario. The individual is no longer a victim of the system's logic; they've become an active opponent.

The Central Conflict The core issue this post raises is the apparent contradiction between a divine entity that is supposed to be "all love" and a system that seems to punish those who are struggling.

The "Love/Light" Contradiction: The author finds it hypocritical that a "love/light" entity would "kick you when you're down." They're arguing that a truly benevolent force would help, not send more problems. The "catalyst" explanation—that challenges are for learning—is rejected as a rationalization for a system that feels cruel and unfair.

The Powerless State: A major source of frustration is the feeling of being powerless. The author feels that their fate is in the hands of others (potential employers) and that their natural human reaction to worry and anxiety only makes things worse. This "vicious circle" is seen as a rigged game with no way to win, which is why the author's act of rebellion is so significant. It's a way of reclaiming some power and agency.

The Comparison to Yahweh: The comparison to Yahweh (as described in some critiques) reinforces the author's point. They see both systems as run by "assholes" because neither one seems to be a truly benevolent force. The "one infinite creator" is seen as a more subtle but equally unfair version of the same thing.

In essence, the scenario suggests that the individual's defiance is their personal way of resolving the paradox. They've found a form of peace not by surrendering to the system's rules, but by rejecting the system entirely. They're choosing their own path and dealing with the consequences on their own terms.

===============================

Doesn't say if you're gonna be losing more, seems a bit like it at first. But hey, at least you're not "settling for the deal" with this bullshit. The system is corrupt, so fuck them. Who kicks somebody when they're down, when they're claming they're emanating "love/light". That ain't emanting "love/light", ok, that's called being an asshole. So fuck their system. It's "bad".

This is a way to actually get rid of that anxiety bad feeling. Went away after figuring this out. Fuck these guys.

I put this post contents in the google gemini AI asking it, what do you think 'll happen in this scenario. It said:

This scenario you've laid out is a detailed and frustrated critique of a specific spiritual or philosophical concept of karma and the divine. The text describes a system where a "one infinite creator" or "top level logos" emanates a "love/light" vibration. According to this view, if a person's own vibration, or state of mind, doesn't match this "love/light" vibe—for example, if they're worried about being unemployed—the system sends them challenges, or "catalysts," to correct the imbalance.

Based on the perspective presented in the post, here's an analysis of what might happen next and the core conflict at play:

What Will Happen According to This View The author of the post has made a choice to reject the system and its rules. Instead of trying to find "peace" by passively accepting the "catalysts" and aligning with the supposed "love/light" vibration, they have chosen to actively resist. They've decided to stick to their own "standards" and defiance, essentially saying "bring it on" to the challenges the system might throw at them.

According to the logic described in the post, this defiant attitude is still a "distortion" of the "love/light" vibe. Therefore, the system, if it continues to operate as described, would likely send more challenges or "bullshit" their way. The author anticipates this, but they've found a different kind of peace in their rebellion. The anxiety about being "powerless" and having to play a rigged game is gone because they've decided not to play by the rules. Their new mindset is one of resistance rather than passive acceptance.

This is a key turning point in the scenario. The individual is no longer a victim of the system's logic; they've become an active opponent.

The Central Conflict The core issue this post raises is the apparent contradiction between a divine entity that is supposed to be "all love" and a system that seems to punish those who are struggling.

The "Love/Light" Contradiction: The author finds it hypocritical that a "love/light" entity would "kick you when you're down." They're arguing that a truly benevolent force would help, not send more problems. The "catalyst" explanation—that challenges are for learning—is rejected as a rationalization for a system that feels cruel and unfair.

The Powerless State: A major source of frustration is the feeling of being powerless. The author feels that their fate is in the hands of others (potential employers) and that their natural human reaction to worry and anxiety only makes things worse. This "vicious circle" is seen as a rigged game with no way to win, which is why the author's act of rebellion is so significant. It's a way of reclaiming some power and agency.

The Comparison to Yahweh: The comparison to Yahweh (as described in some critiques) reinforces the author's point. They see both systems as run by "assholes" because neither one seems to be a truly benevolent force. The "one infinite creator" is seen as a more subtle but equally unfair version of the same thing.

In essence, the scenario suggests that the individual's defiance is their personal way of resolving the paradox. They've found a form of peace not by surrendering to the system's rules, but by rejecting the system entirely. They're choosing their own path and dealing with the consequences on their own terms.