Yes, if you're trying to prove what you also need to prove "where".
It's one of the US Virgin Islands, there is no jurisdictional doubt.
AlthoughI think the US and UK have sepcific laws about sex tourism with children to prosecute people going to Thailand etc. in their home country.
But she was 16, so legally consenting without coercion in many US states and the UK.
I imagine no actual cash changed hands for the actual sex like a regualr prostitute. Epstein turns up with what seem to be willing girls, you don't force anyone or pay directly. And if they are of legal age, where's the crime?
Yes, if you're trying to prove what you also need tp prove "where".
Who has jurisdiction in my private residence on my private land?
It's one of the US Virgin Islands, there is no jurisdictional doubt.
Althoug I think the US and UK have sepcific laws about sex tourism with children to prosecute people going to Thailand etc. in their home country.
But she was 16, so legally consenting without coercion in many US states and the UK.
I imagine no actual cash changed hands for the actual sex like a regualr prostitute. Epstein turns up with what seem to be willing girls, you don't force anyone or pay directly. And if they are of legal age, where's the crime?
Yes, if you're trying to prove what you also need tp prove "where".
Who has jurisdiction in my private residence on my private land?
It's one of the US Virgin Islands, there is no jurisdictional doubt.
Althoug I think the US and UK have sepcific laws about sex tourism with children to prosecute people going to Thailand etc. in their home country.
But she was 16, so legally consenting without coercion in many US staes and the UK.
Yes, if you're trying to prove what you also need tp prove "where".
Who has jurisdiction in my private residence on my private land?
It's one of the US Virgin Islands, there is no jurisdictional doubt.
Althoug I think the US and UK have sepcific laws about sex tourism with children to prosecute people going to Thailand etc. in their home country.