In theory, yes, but I'm not sure it has ever been the case. Most probably it has always been like it is now. It's just that they could no longer sell fairytale about hereditary rulership to the public, so they came up with this thing called democracy.

Democracy was well known since Ancient Greece. Plato wrote about the various forms of government and noted democracy to be one of the least desirable (compared to republic and aristocracy). Saying it has always been like this and there is no real change on a very deep level is naive and symptomatic of a modern cynicism driven by ignorance and false historical narratives - it is a cope. I'd say we are at the lowest point of out European civilization for the past 2000 years and nearing the end of it really (as historians like Oswald Spengler famously predicted in Decline of the West).

It's a very complex subject, but the historical fact of the matter is that there was a paradigm shift around the Enlightenment revolutionary period (17-18-19c) that led to the collapse of the Old world and of traditional institutions and society. For thousands of years it made sense to people that the world followed a divinely ordained hierarchy (patriarchy) and everyone had a firm place in it. It was a top-down hierarchy with God at the top, and under Him was the priest class of the Church and the king with his aristocracy. Since our ancestors lived in Christian states and were Christians themselves, they strongly believed that monarchs got their mandate to rule by God Himself (as shown in the Bible). Monarchs had a duty to serve their people and the people had a duty to serve their rulers. This was not viewed as a power dialectic resulting in oppression (a jewish concept btw), but as a chain of command where all parties did their part towards a common goal (the Greek called it symphonia). It was evident for everyone that power came from above (top-down), and not from below (bottom-up).

Now talmudic jews were always unimpressed with this and came up with ideas that challenged the natural order and hierarchy. Their main project came to be known as communism, but they also made offshoots to cover more ground/minds - anarchy, democracy, liberalism, socialism, etc. They realized that the only way to destroy the old world was through violent revolutions aided by massive propaganda at the top levels of academia and culture which they managed to infiltrate through secret societies (really spy networks) and financial prowess (usury). They weaponized all kinds of degenerate ideas to subvert the existing hierarchy and people's faith in it - atheism, materialism, feminism, individualism, freemasonry, marxism, free global market, drug trafficking, degradation of culture and art, sexual immorality and deviancy (later called sexual revolution), darwinism, freudism, etc.

So no, it is not that the rulers of the old world could no longer sell their worldview to the people and the "enlightened masses" out of their own free will got to arms and liberated themselves from the tyranny of superstition and slavery. That's how the (((liberal))) history propaganda goes about what took place. What happened was that some people got brainwashed by jewed up masonic ideas of "liberty, equality, fraternity" and took part in the jewish revolutions that successfully established a new era of humanity - our beloved NWO.

Basically, very short version is that humanity has to get rid of superstitious belief in this thing called authority. Any authority. The problem is not that the government is bad or that politians are bad, or that the form of government is not the right one. The problem is that it exists at all and that masses believe in it.

So anarchy. Authority follows logically from the existence of hierarchy and power. The world you're describing doesn't exist and can't exist - it is logically impossible unless people somehow live completely alienated from one another, kinda in their own metaverse.

In theory, yes, but I'm not sure it has ever been the case. Most probably it has always been like it is now. It's just that they could no longer sell fairytale about hereditary rulership to the public, so they came up with this thing called democracy.

Democracy was well known since Ancient Greece. Plato wrote about the various forms of government and noted democracy to be one of the least desirable (compared to republic and aristocracy). Saying it has always been like this and there is no real change on a very deep level is naive and symptomatic of a modern cynicism driven by ignorance and false historical narratives - it is a cope. I'd say we are at the lowest point of out European civilization for the past 2000 years and nearing the end of it really (as historians like Oswald Spengler famously predicted in Decline of the West).

It's a very complex subject, but the historical fact of the matter is that there was a paradigm shift around the Enlightenment revolutionary period (17-18-19c) that led to the collapse of the Old world and of traditional institutions and society. For thousands of years it made sense to people that the world followed a divinely ordained hierarchy (patriarchy) and everyone had a firm place in it. It was a top-down hierarchy with God at the top, and under Him was the priest class of the Church and the king with his aristocracy. Since our ancestors lived in Christian states and were Christians themselves, they strongly believed that monarchs got their mandate to rule by God Himself (as shown in the Bible). Monarchs had a duty to serve their people and the people had a duty to serve their rulers. This was not viewed as a power dialectic resulting in oppression (a jewish concept btw), but as a chain of command where all parties did their part towards a common goal. It was evident for everyone that power came from above (top-down), and not from below (bottom-up).

Now talmudic jews were always unimpressed with this and came up with ideas that challenged the natural order and hierarchy. Their main project came to be known as communism, but they also made offshoots to cover more ground/minds - anarchy, democracy, liberalism, socialism, etc. They realized that the only way to destroy the old world was through violent revolutions aided by massive propaganda at the top levels of academia and culture which they managed to infiltrate through secret societies (really spy networks) and financial prowess (usury). They weaponized all kinds of degenerate ideas to subvert the existing hierarchy and people's faith in it - atheism, materialism, feminism, individualism, freemasonry, marxism, free global market, drug trafficking, degradation of culture and art, sexual immorality and deviancy (later called sexual revolution), darwinism, freudism, etc.

So no, it is not that the rulers of the old world could no longer sell their worldview to the people and the "enlightened masses" out of their own free will got to arms and liberated themselves from the tyranny of superstition and slavery. That's how the (((liberal))) history propaganda goes about what took place. What happened was that some people got brainwashed by jewed up masonic ideas of "liberty, equality, fraternity" and took part in the jewish revolutions that successfully established a new era of humanity - our beloved NWO.

Basically, very short version is that humanity has to get rid of superstitious belief in this thing called authority. Any authority. The problem is not that the government is bad or that politians are bad, or that the form of government is not the right one. The problem is that it exists at all and that masses believe in it.

So anarchy. Authority follows logically from the existence of hierarchy and power. The world you're describing doesn't exist and can't exist - it is logically impossible unless people somehow live completely alienated from one another, kinda in their own metaverse.

In theory, yes, but I'm not sure it has ever been the case. Most probably it has always been like it is now. It's just that they could no longer sell fairytale about hereditary rulership to the public, so they came up with this thing called democracy.

Democracy was well known since Ancient Greece. Plato wrote about the various forms of government and noted democracy to be one of the least desirable (compared to republic and aristocracy). Saying it has always been like this and there is no real change on a very deep level is naive and symptomatic of a modern cynicism driven by ignorance and false historical narratives - it is a cope. I'd say we are at the lowest point of out European civilization for the past 2000 years and nearing the end of it really (as historians like Oswald Spengler famously predicted in Decline of the West).

It's a very complex subject, but the historical fact of the matter is that there was a paradigm shift around the Enlightenment revolutionary period (17-18-19c) that led to the collapse of the Old world and of traditional institutions and society. For thousands of years it made sense to people that the world followed a divinely ordained hierarchy (patriarchy) and everyone had a firm place in it. It was a top-down hierarchy with God at the top, and under Him was the priest class of the Church and the king with his aristocracy. Since our ancestors lived in Christian states and were Christians themselves, they strongly believed that monarchs got their mandate to rule by God Himself (as shown in the Bible). Monarchs had a duty to serve their people and the people had a duty to serve their rulers. This was not viewed as a power dialectic resulting in oppression (a jewish concept btw), but as a chain of command where all parties did their part towards a common goal. It was evident for everyone that power came from above (top-down), and not from below (bottom-up).

Now talmudic jews were always unimpressed with this and came up with ideas that challenged the natural order and hierarchy. Their main project came to be known as communism, but they also made offshoots to cover more ground/minds - anarchy, democracy, liberalism, socialism, etc. They realized that the only way to destroy the old world was through violent revolutions aided by massive propaganda at the top levels of academia and culture which they managed to infiltrate through secret societies (really spy networks) and financial prowess (usury). They weaponized all kinds of degenerate ideas to subvert the existing hierarchy and people's faith in it - atheism, materialism, feminism, marxism, free global market, drug trafficking, degradation of culture and art, sexual immorality and deviancy (later called sexual revolution), darwinism, freudism, etc.

So no, it is not that the rulers of the old world could no longer sell their worldview to the people and the "enlightened masses" out of their own free will got to arms and liberated themselves from the tyranny of superstition and slavery. That's how the (((liberal))) history propaganda goes about what took place. What happened was that some people got brainwashed by jewed up masonic ideas of "liberty, equality, fraternity" and took part in the jewish revolutions that successfully established a new era of humanity - our beloved NWO.

Basically, very short version is that humanity has to get rid of superstitious belief in this thing called authority. Any authority. The problem is not that the government is bad or that politians are bad, or that the form of government is not the right one. The problem is that it exists at all and that masses believe in it.

So anarchy. Authority follows logically from the existence of hierarchy and power. The world you're describing doesn't exist and can't exist - it is logically impossible unless people somehow live completely alienated from one another, kinda in their own metaverse.

In theory, yes, but I'm not sure it has ever been the case. Most probably it has always been like it is now. It's just that they could no longer sell fairytale about hereditary rulership to the public, so they came up with this thing called democracy.

Democracy was well known since Ancient Greece. Plato wrote about the various forms of government and noted democracy to be one of the least desirable (compared to republic and aristocracy). Saying it has always been like this and there is no real change on a very deep level is naive and symptomatic of a modern cynicism driven by ignorance and false historical narratives - it is a cope. I'd say we are at the lowest point of out European civilization for the past 2000 years and nearing the end of it really (as historians like Oswald Spengler famously predicted in Decline of the West).

It's a very complex subject, but the historical fact of the matter is that there was a paradigm shift around the Enlightenment revolutionary period (17-18-19c) that led to the collapse of the Old world and of traditional institutions and society. For thousands of years it made sense to people that the world followed a divinely ordained hierarchy (patriarchy) and everyone had a firm place in it. It was a top-down hierarchy with God at the top, and under Him was the priest class of the Church and the king with his aristocracy. Since our ancestors lived in Christian states and were Christians themselves, they strongly believed that monarchs got their mandate to rule by God Himself (as shown in the Bible). Monarchs had a duty to serve their people and the people had a duty to serve their rulers. This was not viewed as a power dialectic resulting in oppression (a jewish concept btw), but as a chain of command where all parties did their part towards a common goal. It was evident for everyone that power came from above (top-down), and not from below (bottom-up).

Now talmudic jews were always unimpressed with this and came up with ideas that challenged the natural order and hierarchy. Their main project came to be known as communism, but they also made offshoots to cover more ground/minds - anarchy, democracy, liberalism, socialism, etc. They realized that the only way to destroy the old world was through violent revolutions aided by massive propaganda at the top levels of academia and culture which they managed to infiltrate through secret societies (really spy networks) and financial prowess (usury). They weaponized all kinds of degenerate ideas to subvert the existing hierarchy and people's faith in it - atheism, materialism, feminism, marxism, free global market, drug trafficking, degradation of culture and art, sexual immorality and deviancy (later called sexual revolution), darwinism, freudism, etc.

So no, it is not that the rulers of the old world could no longer sell their worldview to the people and the "enlightened masses" out of their own free will got to arms and liberated themselves from the tyranny of superstition and slavery. That's how the (((liberal))) history propaganda goes about what took place. What happened was that some people got brainwashed by jewed up masonic ideas of "liberty, equality, fraternity" and took part in the jewish revolutions that successfully established a new era of humanity - our beloved NWO.