It's much worse. The chief editor of the Lancet wrote an article saying at least half of peer-reviewed papers are likely false.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1/fulltext

If facts mattered, this should be enough to make every normie soyence enjoyer shut up when waxing poetic about "muh science" and "muh experts".

This is not even counting the crazy amount of conflict of interests, revolving door authors and bought academics and institutions that plague scientific research. Only a complete tool who is clueless about the world, history, common sense and human nature can believe science can't be corrupted or bought. And you shouldn't waste time arguing with such NPCs to begin with.

It's much worse. The chief editor of the Lancet wrote an article saying at least half of peer-reviewed papers are likely false.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1/fulltext

If facts mattered, this should be enough to make every normie soyence enjoyer shut up when waxing poetic about "muh science" and "muh experts". This is not even counting the crazy amount of conflict of interests, revolving door authors and bought academics and institutions that plague scientific research. Only a complete tool who is clueless about the world, history, common sense and human nature can believe science can't be corrupted or bought.