entire existence
Being implies fraction within integer, hence only within entire can one exist.
You never posted anything
Everything perceivable is given towards each ones perception...posting anything suggested tempts one to ignore all given.
you don't aim to contribute
a) Aiming implies towards outcome, hence wanting to get (tar-get)...free will of choice implies ones response to origin, hence needing to adapt to what one already got.
b) Tribute; noun - "stated sum of money or other valuable consideration paid by one ruler or country to another in acknowledgment of submission"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tribute
Paying another implies selling self out. Free will of choice cannot pay tributes without contradicting itself.
You're a chatbot
Which bot can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly? Also...chatting aka idle talk aka babble implies babylon (babbling on).
Nature implies ongoing activity; each being within temporary re-activation....ignoring nature for one another tempts one into idleness.
I wished for mods
One who submits wishes for moderation by another aka shirking of response-ability...voting representatives is based upon exploiting that.
Nobody could be more useless
How could one use no body? What if each one implies body (matter) within mind (momentum) of all (motion).
Most users have blocked
a) Nature promotes "free" will of choice to each being...few exploit ones ignorance thereof by tempting many to block each other.
b) Nature uses; each being within re-uses nature or ab-uses each other, which requires an artificial block upon ones natural free will of choice aka "willing ignorance".
it helps me to stay sane
Sane/sanus - "sound"...sound moves, which prevents each instrument within from staying too long.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see.... https://genius.com/The-clash-should-i-stay-or-should-i-go-lyrics
Resisting the clash (reason) allows one to discern self as staying (life) during going (inception towards death)
If you actually had arguments...
...then my arguing mind would ignore actual perception for fictional reasoning about suggestion.
Argumentation (vs) contradicts implication (if/then)...all implies one; argumentation implies one vs another, while ignoring all.
how useless you are, and how useful I am
Useless vs useful argumentation implies self abuse, while seeking others to abuse. The only way out...letting go of self possession (I am).
like you...and the difference is way big
Free-will-of-choice comments LIKE who else? What if only DIFFERENCE can be free?
entire existence
Being implies fraction within integer, hence only within entire can one exist.
You never posted anything
Everything perceivable is given towards each ones perception...posting anything suggested tempts one to ignore all given.
you don't aim to contribute
a) Aiming implies towards outcome, hence wanting to get (tar-get)...free will of choice implies ones response to origin, hence needing to adapt to what one already got.
b) Tribute; noun - "stated sum of money or other valuable consideration paid by one ruler or country to another in acknowledgment of submission"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tribute
Paying another implies selling self out. Free will of choice cannot pay tributes without contradicting itself.
You're a chatbot
Which bot can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly? Also...chatting aka idle talk aka babble implies babylon (babbling on).
Nature implies ongoing activity; each being within temporary re-activation....ignoring nature for one another tempts one into idleness.
I wished for mods
One who submits wishes for moderation by another aka shirking of response-ability...voting representatives is based upon exploiting that.
Nobody could be more useless
How could one use no body? What if each one implies body (matter) within mind (momentum) of all (motion).
Most users have blocked
a) Nature promotes "free" will of choice to each being...few exploit ones ignorance thereof by tempting many to block each other.
b) Nature uses; each being within re-uses nature or ab-uses each other, which requires an artificial block upon ones natural free will of choice aka "willing ignorance".
it helps me to stay sane
Sane/sanus - "sound"...sound moves, which prevents each instruments within from staying too long.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see.... https://genius.com/The-clash-should-i-stay-or-should-i-go-lyrics
Resisting the clash (reason) allows one to discern self as staying (life) during going (inception towards death)
If you actually had arguments...
...then my arguing mind would ignore actual perception for fictional reasoning about suggestion.
Argumentation (vs) contradicts implication (if/then)...all implies one; argumentation implies one vs another, while ignoring all.
how useless you are, and how useful I am
Useless vs useful argumentation implies self abuse, while seeking others to abuse. The only way out...letting go of self possession (I am).
like you...and the difference is way big
Free-will-of-choice comments LIKE who else? What if only DIFFERENCE can be free?