Well, yes and no... What if this creative degradation we've witnessed for the last years was a deliberate priming of population for the planned advent of an AI? The fact that human creativity has recently experienced it's low point is not a justification for AI to destroy it completely.
See, it's not just about destruction of creativity. It's also about destruction of demand. I might be interested reading that novella even being aware that it's written by Indian ghost writer, but I sure as shit am not interested in reading something that has been generated by an AI in like a minute or less. The same goes for music as well. Sure, right now it's still interesting to wonder what piece of music AI can come up with, but when that initial wonder settles no serious listeners for that stuff will be left anymore. Music will remain just as a meaningless background noise or mood setter at best.
Also, destruction of creativity is only the tip of the iceberg. Ultimate goal here seems to be to destroy the humanity itself.
Well, yes and no... What if this creative degradation we've witnessed for the last years was a deliberate priming of population for the planned advent of an AI? The fact that human creativity has recently experienced it's low point is not a justification for AI to destroy it completely.
See, it's not just about destruction of creativity. It's also about destruction of demand. I might be interested reading that novella even being aware that it's written by Indian ghost writer, but I sure a shit am not interested in reading something that has been generated by an AI in like a minute or less. The same goes for music as well. Sure, right now it's still interesting to wonder what piece of music AI can come up with, but when that initial wonder settles no serious listeners for that stuff will be left anymore. Music will remain just as a meaningless background noise or mood setter at best.
Also, destruction of creativity is only the tip of the iceberg. Ultimate goal here seems to be to destroy the humanity itself.
Well, yes and no... What if this creative degradation we've witnessed for the last years was a deliberate priming of population for the planned advent of an AI? The fact that human creativity has recently experienced it's low point is not a justification for AI to destroy it completely.
See, it's not just about destruction of creativity. It's also about destruction of demand. I might be interested reading that novella even being aware that it's written by Indian ghost writer, but I sure a shit am not interested in reading something that has been generated by an AI in like a minute or less. The same goes for music as well. Sure, right now it's still interesting to wonder what piece of music AI can come up with, but when that initial wonder settles no listeners for that will be left anymore. Music will remain just as a meaningless background noise at best.
Also, destruction of creativity is only the tip of the iceberg. Ultimate goal here seems to be to destroy the humanity itself.
Well, yes and no... What if this creative degradation we've witnessed for the last years was a deliberate priming of population for the planned advent of an AI? The fact that human creativity has recently experienced it's low point is not a justification for AI to destroy it completely.
Also, destruction of creativity is only the tip of the iceberg. Ultimate goal here seems to be to destroy the humanity itself.