Everything is influence from the top to the bottom: do the "right thing" and "good luck" will flow your way. No, these things are not right and it's it not luck but orchestration.

This is actually a very important topic. How exactly some conspiracy happens? How do they manage it? Usually the second thing normies say (right after ever popular question: "who are they?") is: "This conspiracy can't be true because all of them would have to be in on it and everyone would have to keep a secret." Well, no, not all of them have to be in on it and not everyone has to have the full picture for some conspiracy to work.

Basically there are two ways of managing something. One is direct management. (Like, say, a company with departments, managers etc.) The other one is indirect management. First one is what normies have in mind when they dismiss some conspiracy as impossible. Second one is how it is actually done. More like tending a garden and less like managing a company. When you tend a garden you don't directly tell every flower which way to grow. No, you just water it, tend to soil and make some small adjustments here and there... and that's about it. The garden grows by itself. This is how I see most conspiracies working. They just push the right buttons at the right time. Sure, they most probably do have some key people in key positions, but for the most part conspiracy works out by itself.

Now, wouldn't this mean that even if Corbett is a gatekeeper, he himself might not be entirely aware of it? Even if he has some minder attached, it doesn't necessarily mean he consciously knows about it...

Corbett definitely says explicitly "there's no one at the top" now.

Hmm, I haven't noticed it... I'll keep this in mind and pay attention next time watching his videos.

Everything is influence from the top to the bottom: do the "right thing" and "good luck" will flow your way. No, these things are not right and it's it not luck but orchestration.

This is actually a very important topic. How exactly some conspiracy happens? How do they manage it? Usually the second thing normies say (right after ever popular question: "who are they?") is: "This conspiracy can't be true because all of them would have to be in on it and everyone would have to keep a secret." Well, no, not all of them have to be in on it and not everyone has to have the full picture for some conspiracy to work.

Basically there are two ways of managing something. One is direct management. (Like, say, a company with departments, managers etc.) The other one is indirect management. First one is what normies have in mind when they dismiss some conspiracy as impossible. Second one is how it is actually done. More like tending a garden and less like managing a company. When you tend a garden you don't directly tell every flower which way to grow. No, you just water it, tend to soil and make some small adjustments here and there... and that's about it. The garden grows by itself. This is how I see most conspiracies working. They just push the right buttons at the right time. Sure, they most probably do have some key people in key positions, but for the most part conspiracy works out by itself.

Now, wouldn't this mean that even if Corbett is a gatekeeper, he himself might not be entirely aware of it? Even if he has some minder attached, it doesn't necessarily mean he consciously knows it...

Corbett definitely says explicitly "there's no one at the top" now.

Hmm, I haven't noticed it... I'll keep this in mind and pay attention next time watching his videos.

Everything is influence from the top to the bottom: do the "right thing" and "good luck" will flow your way. No, these things are not right and it's it not luck but orchestration.

This is actually a very important topic. How exactly some conspiracy happens? How do they manage it? Usually the second thing normies say (right after ever popular question: "who are they?") is: "This conspiracy can't be true because all of them would have to be in on it and everyone would have to keep a secret." Well, no, not all of them have to be in on it and not everyone has to have the full picture for some conspiracy to work.

Basically there are two ways of managing something. One is direct top down management. The other one is indirect management. First one is what normies have in mind when they dismiss some conspiracy as impossible. Second one is how it is actually done. More like tending a garden and less like managing a company. When you tend a garden you don't directly tell every flower which way to grow. No, you just water it, tend to soil and make some small adjustments here and there... and that's about it. The garden grows by itself. This is how I see most conspiracies working. They just push the right buttons at the right time. Sure, they most probably do have some key people in key positions, but for the most part conspiracy works out by itself.

Now, wouldn't this mean that even if Corbett is a gatekeeper, he himself might not be entirely aware of it? Even if he has some minder attached, it doesn't necessarily mean he consciously knows it...

Corbett definitely says explicitly "there's no one at the top" now.

Hmm, I haven't noticed it... I'll keep this in mind and pay attention next time watching his videos.

Everything is influence from the top to the bottom: do the "right thing" and "good luck" will flow your way. No, these things are not right and it's it not luck but orchestration.

This is actually a very important topic. How exactly some conspiracy happens? How do they manage it? Usually the second thing normies say (right after ever popular question: "who are they?") is: "This conspiracy can't be true because all of them would have to be in on it and everyone would have to keep a secret." Well, no, not all of them have to be in on it and not everyone has to have the full picture for some conspiracy to work.

Basically there are two ways of managing something. One is direct top down management and the other one is indirect management. First one is what normies have in mind when they dismiss some conspiracy as impossible. Second one is how it is actually done. More like tending a garden and less like managing a company. When you tend a garden you don't directly tell every flower which way to grow. No, you just water it, tend to soil and make some small adjustments here and there... and that's about it. The garden grows by itself. This is how I see most conspiracies working. They just push the right buttons at the right time. Sure, they most probably do have some key people in key positions, but for the most part conspiracy works out by itself.

Now, wouldn't this mean that even if Corbett is a gatekeeper, he himself might not be entirely aware of it? Even if he has some minder attached, it doesn't necessarily mean he consciously knows it...

Corbett definitely says explicitly "there's no one at the top" now.

Hmm, I haven't noticed it... I'll keep this in mind and pay attention next time watching his videos.

Everything is influence from the top to the bottom: do the "right thing" and "good luck" will flow your way. No, these things are not right and it's it not luck but orchestration.

This is actually a very important topic. How exactly some conspiracy happens? How do they manage it? Usually the second thing normies say (right after ever popular question: "who are they?") is: "This conspiracy can't be true because all of them would have to be in on it and everyone would have to keep a secret." Well, no, not all of them have to be in on it and not everyone has to have the full picture for some conspiracy to work.

Basically there are two ways of managing something. One is direct top down management and the other one is indirect management. First one is what normies have in mind when they dismiss some conspiracy as impossible. Second one is how it is actually done. More like tending a garden and less like managing a company. When you tend a garden you don't directly tell every flower which way to grow. No, you just water it, tend to soil and make some small adjustments here and there... and that's about it. The garden grows by itself. This is how I see most conspiracies working. They just push the right buttons at the right time. Sure, they most probably do have some key people in key positions, but for the most part conspiracy works out by itself.

Now, wouldn't this mean that even if Corbett is a gatekeeper, he himself might not be entirely aware of it? Even if he has some minder attached, it doesn't necessarily mean he consciously knows it...