The comments he made were like he was getting them by reading the front page of the New York Times.

Yes, sometimes he does that. Almost like taking mainstream media at face value... but usually that's only the starting point which then goes to very non-mainstream directions.

The highlight, the fundamental theme, was that he was totally anti-Putin. Later on and still, he's totally anti-Trump. Guy cannot do a single thing right and you're a shithead for even thinking otherwise, you know?

As far as I know he's an anarchist (or at least presents himself as one). Very hardcore libertarian, if you will. So, taking that into account his anti Trump/Putin rants kind of make sense. Like, there is no such thing as good government or good power. In Corbetts view the only good government is a small one and an invisible one.

Trump and Putin are far and away the biggest threats to "Them".

Hmm, I have my doubts about that. Sometimes I really do view them as threats to The Powers That Be. On some other times, though, I'm not so sure about that. Probably Corbett is right and Trump/Putin are not a threat, but their biggest assets instead.

After all what have they done? Sure, they both talk big and all that, but what are the actual results? Is the march to Agenda 2030 stopped? No. Is WHO dismantled and all those criminals prosecuted? Again, no. They are still pushing for all of that and even more.

I really don't know about this one... I guess this is yet to be determined whether they really are threats to TPTB or are actually with them... Or maybe they're just figureheads and aren't actually deciding anything.

It was only a summary. He gave nothing away, you see?

You do have a point here. He does not give away anything that's not already out there. He's all about summary and analysis - not grand revelations - but it's a very good summary and very thought provoking analysis at that.

He's a true gatekeeper.

Could be. I like to follow him because of his analysis and some unexpected viewpoints, but I certainly wouldn't take him as absolute truthsayer or anything like that. He also often does interviews with Whitney Webb who most probably really is a limited hangout, but I could be mistaken on that, I haven't listened her that much.

The comments he made were like he was getting them by reading the front page of the New York Times.

Yes, sometimes he does that. Almost like taking mainstream media at face value... but usually that's only the starting point which then goes to very non-mainstream directions.

The highlight, the fundamental theme, was that he was totally anti-Putin. Later on and still, he's totally anti-Trump. Guy cannot do a single thing right and you're a shithead for even thinking otherwise, you know?

As far as I know he's an anarchist (or at least presents himself as one). Very hardcore libertarian, if you will. So, taking that into account his anti Trump/Putin rants kind of make sense. Like, there is not such thing as good power and no such thing as good government either. In Corbetts view the only good government is a small one and an invisible one.

Trump and Putin are far and away the biggest threats to "Them".

Hmm, I have my doubts about that. Sometimes I really do view them as threats to The Powers That Be. On some other times, though, I'm not so sure about that. Probably Corbett is right and Trump/Putin are not a threat, but their biggest assets instead.

After all what have they done? Sure, they both talk big and all that, but what are the actual results? Is the march to Agenda 2030 stopped? No. Is WHO dismantled and all those criminals prosecuted? Again, no. They are still pushing for all of that and even more.

I really don't know about this one... I guess this is yet to be determined whether they really are threats to TPTB or are actually with them... Or maybe they're just figureheads and aren't actually deciding anything.

It was only a summary. He gave nothing away, you see?

You do have a point here. He does not give away anything that's not already out there. He's all about summary and analysis - not grand revelations - but it's a very good summary and very thought provoking analysis at that.

He's a true gatekeeper.

Could be. I like to follow him because of his analysis and some unexpected viewpoints, but I certainly wouldn't take him as absolute truthsayer or anything like that. He also often does interviews with Whitney Webb who most probably really is a limited hangout, but I could be mistaken on that, I haven't listened her that much.

The comments he made were like he was getting them by reading the front page of the New York Times.

Yes, sometimes he does that. Almost like taking mainstream media at the face value... but usually that's only the starting point which then goes to very non-mainstream directions.

The highlight, the fundamental theme, was that he was totally anti-Putin. Later on and still, he's totally anti-Trump. Guy cannot do a single thing right and you're a shithead for even thinking otherwise, you know?

As far as I know he's an anarchist (or at least presents himself as one). Very hardcore libertarian, if you will. So, taking that into account his anti Trump/Putin rants kind of make sense. Like, there is not such thing as good power and no such thing as good government either. In Corbetts view the only good government is a small one and an invisible one.

Trump and Putin are far and away the biggest threats to "Them".

Hmm, I have my doubts about that. Sometimes I really do view them as threats to The Powers That Be. On some other times, though, I'm not so sure about that. Probably Corbett is right and Trump/Putin are not a threat, but their biggest assets instead.

After all what have they done? Sure, they both talk big and all that, but what are the actual results? Is the march to Agenda 2030 stopped? No. Is WHO dismantled and all those criminals prosecuted? Again, no. They are still pushing for all of that and even more.

I really don't know about this one... I guess this is yet to be determined whether they really are threats to TPTB or are actually with them... Or maybe they're just figureheads and aren't actually deciding anything.

It was only a summary. He gave nothing away, you see?

You do have a point here. He does not give away anything that's not already out there. He's all about summary and analysis - not grand revelations - but it's a very good summary and very thought provoking analysis at that.

He's a true gatekeeper.

Could be. I like to follow him because of his analysis and some unexpected viewpoints, but I certainly wouldn't take him as absolute truthsayer or anything like that. He also often does interviews with Whitney Webb who most probably really is a limited hangout, but I could be mistaken on that, I haven't listened her that much.

The comments he made were like he was getting them by reading the front page of the New York Times.

Yes, sometimes he does that. Almost like taking mainstream media at the face value... but usually that's only the starting point which then goes to very non-mainstream directions.

The highlight, the fundamental theme, was that he was totally anti-Putin. Later on and still, he's totally anti-Trump. Guy cannot do a single thing right and you're a shithead for even thinking otherwise, you know?

As far as I know he's an anarchist (or at least presents himself as one). Very hardcore libertarian, if you will. So, taking that into account his anti Trump/Putin rants kind of make sense. Like, there is not such thing as good power and no such thing as good government either. In Corbetts view the only good government is a small one and an invisible one.

Trump and Putin are far and away the biggest threats to "Them".

Hmm, I have my doubts about that. Sometimes I really do view them as threats to The Powers That Be. On some other times, though, I'm not so sure about that. Probably Corbett is right and Trump/Putin are not a threat, but their biggest assets instead.

After all what have they done? Sure, they both talk big and all that, but what are the actual results? Is the march to Agenda 2030 stopped? No. Is WHO dismantled and all those criminals prosecuted? Again, no. They are still pushing for all of that and even more.

I really don't know about this one... I guess this is yet to be determined whether they really are threats to TPTB or are actually with them... Or maybe they're just figureheads and aren't actually deciding anything.

It was only a summary. He gave nothing away, you see?

You do have a point here. He does not give away anything that's not already out there. He's all about summary and analysis - not grand revelations - but it's a very good summary and very thought provoking analysis at that.

He's a true gatekeeper.

Could be. I like to follow him because of his analysis and some unexpected viewpoints, but I certainly wouldn't take him as absolute truthsayer or anything like that. He also often does interviews with Whitney Webb who most probably is a limited hangout, but I could be mistaken on that, I haven't listened her that much.

The comments he made were like he was getting them by reading the front page of the New York Times.

Yes, sometimes he does that. Almost like taking mainstream media at the face value... but usually that's only the starting point which then goes to very non-mainstream directions.

The highlight, the fundamental theme, was that he was totally anti-Putin. Later on and still, he's totally anti-Trump. Guy cannot do a single thing right and you're a shithead for even thinking otherwise, you know?

As far as I know he's an anarchist (or at least presents himself as one). Very hardcore libertarian, if you will. So, taking that into account his anti Trump/Putin rants kind of make sense. Like, there is not such thing as good power and no such thing as good government either. In Corbetts view the only good government is a small one and an invisible one.

Trump and Putin are far and away the biggest threats to "Them".

Hmm, I have my doubts about that. Sometimes I really do view them as threats to The Powers That Be. On some other times, though, I'm not so sure about that. Probably Corbett is right and Trump/Putin are not a threat, but their biggest assets instead.

After all what have they done? Sure, they both talk big and all that, but what are the actual results? Is the march to Agenda 2030 stopped? No. Is WHO dismantled and all those criminals prosecuted? Again, no. They are still pushing for all of that and even more.

I really don't know about this one... I guess this is yet to be determined whether they really are threats to TPTB or are actually with them... Or maybe they're just figureheads and aren't actually deciding anything.

It was only a summary. He gave nothing away, you see?

You do have a point here. He does not give away anything that's not already out there. He's all about summary and analysis - not grand revelations - but it's a very good summary and very thought provoking analysis at that.

He's a true gatekeeper.

Could be. I like to follow him because of his analysis and some unexpected viewpoints, but I certainly wouldn't take him as absolute truthsayer or anything like that. He also often does interviews with Whitney Webb who most probably is a limited hangout, but I could be mistaken on that, I haven't listened to her that much.

The comments he made were like he was getting them by reading the front page of the New York Times.

Yes, sometimes he does that. Almost like taking mainstream media at the face value... but usually that's only the starting point which then goes to very non-mainstream directions.

The highlight, the fundamental theme, was that he was totally anti-Putin. Later on and still, he's totally anti-Trump. Guy cannot do a single thing right and you're a shithead for even thinking otherwise, you know?

As far as I know he's an anarchist (or at least presents himself as one). Very hardcore libertarian, if you will. So, taking that into account his anti Trump/Putin rants kind of make sense. Like, there is not such thing as good power and no such thing as good government either. In Corbetts view the only good government is a small one and an invisible one.

Trump and Putin are far and away the biggest threats to "Them".

Hmm, I have my doubts about that. Sometimes I really do view them as threats to them. On some other times, though, I'm not so sure about that. Probably Corbett is right and Trump/Putin are not a threat, but their biggest assets instead.

After all what have they done? Sure, they both talk big and all that, but what are the actual results? Is the march to Agenda 2030 stopped? No. Is WHO dismantled and all those criminals prosecuted? Again, no. They are still pushing for all of that and even more.

I really don't know about this one... I guess this is yet to be determined whether they really are threats to TPTB or are actually with them.

It was only a summary. He gave nothing away, you see?

You do have a point here. He does not give away anything that's not already out there. He's all about summary and analysis - not grand revelations - but it's a very good summary and very thought provoking analysis at that.

He's a true gatekeeper.

Could be. I like to follow him because of his analysis and some unexpected viewpoints, but I certainly wouldn't take him as absolute truthsayer or anything like that. He also often does interviews with Whitney Webb who most probably is a limited hangout, but I could be mistaken on that, I haven't listened to her that much.