At the highest level, which you rarely see, people break with the concept of "authority" entirely. Not that expert opinion doesn't matter, but it doesn't define the truth. The truth is where you find it: mainstream, alternative, scripture, the ravings of lunatics, wherever. Again, very few operate at this level.

You're right. Most people just look for some authority to believe in. For someone to tell them what to do and think. Majority are satisfied with mainstream offering. Some others are not. Those are looking for authorities outside mainstream. However, the very reasoning behind the search stays the same. It differs in direction, but not in nature. I completely agree. It's very important to break with the concept of "authority" altogether.

Sometimes I turn around and reflect in hindsight on what Alex Jones has not said in his long career.

Yep, this is good way to detect that something is not quite right. To look for things they don't talk about. Other good way is to look for things they agree with mainstream, that make them similar to it, if only slightly different. For example, belief in political system. It is a huge red flag, if someone claiming to be opposition still maintains that political systems are real and politicians are those that actually make decisions.

That all said, I do like James Corbett. Sure, he very well might be controlled, but out of the whole bunch he's one of the most insightful. I also like that he doesn't go off on various wild tangents. One could say he's kind of a normie friendly conspiracy theorist. He doesn't make normies flinch (like Alex Jones definitely does, for example). In any case, even if he is controlled op, it's quite high level disinfo.

At the highest level, which you rarely see, people break with the concept of "authority" entirely. Not that expert opinion doesn't matter, but it doesn't define the truth. The truth is where you find it: mainstream, alternative, scripture, the ravings of lunatics, wherever. Again, very few operate at this level.

You're right. Most people just look for some authority to believe in. For someone to tell them what to do and think. Majority are satisfied with mainstream offering. Some others are not. Those are looking for authorities outside mainstream. However, the very reasoning behind the search stays the same. It differs in direction, but not in nature. I completely agree. It's very important to break with the concept of "authority" altogether.

Sometimes I turn around and reflect in hindsight on what Alex Jones has not said in his long career.

Yep, this is good way to detect that something is not quite right. To look for things they don't talk about. Other good way is to look for things they agree with mainstream, that make them similar to it, if only slightly different. For example, belief in political system. It is a huge red flag, if someone claiming to be opposition still maintains that political systems are real, elections do matter and politicians are those that actually make decisions.

That all said, I do like James Corbett. Sure, he very well might be controlled, but out of the whole bunch he's one of the most insightful. I also like that he doesn't go off on various wild tangents. One could say he's kind of a normie friendly conspiracy theorist. He doesn't make normies flinch (like Alex Jones definitely does, for example). In any case, even if he is controlled op, it's quite high level disinfo.

At the highest level, which you rarely see, people break with the concept of "authority" entirely. Not that expert opinion doesn't matter, but it doesn't define the truth. The truth is where you find it: mainstream, alternative, scripture, the ravings of lunatics, wherever. Again, very few operate at this level.

You're right. Most people just look for some authority to believe in. For someone to tell them what to do and think. Majority are satisfied with mainstream offering. Some others are not. Those are looking for authorities outside mainstream. However, the very reasoning behind the search stays the same. It differs in direction, but not in nature. I completely agree. It's very important to break with the concept of "authority" altogether.

Sometimes I turn around and reflect in hindsight on what Alex Jones has not said in his long career.

Yep, this is good way to detect that something is not quite right. To look for things they don't talk about. Other good way is to look for things they agree with mainstream, that make them similar to it, if only slightly different. For example, belief in political system. It is a huge red flag, if someone claiming to be opposition still maintains that political systems are real and elections do actually matter.

That all said, I do like James Corbett. Sure, he very well might be controlled, but out of the whole bunch he's one of the most insightful. I also like that he doesn't go off on various wild tangents. One could say he's kind of a normie friendly conspiracy theorist. He doesn't make normies flinch (like Alex Jones definitely does, for example). In any case, even if he is controlled op, it's quite high level disinfo.

At the highest level, which you rarely see, people break with the concept of "authority" entirely. Not that expert opinion doesn't matter, but it doesn't define the truth. The truth is where you find it: mainstream, alternative, scripture, the ravings of lunatics, wherever. Again, very few operate at this level.

You're right. Most people just look for some authority to believe in. For someone to tell them what to do and think. Majority are satisfied with mainstream offering. Some others are not. Those are looking for authorities outside mainstream. However, the very reasoning behind the search stays the same. It differs in direction, but not in nature. I completely agree. It's very important to break with the concept of "authority" altogether.

Sometimes I turn around and reflect in hindsight on what Alex Jones has not said in his long career.

Yep, this is one way to detect that something is not quite right. Look for things they don't talk about. Other good way is to look for things they agree with mainstream, that make them similar to it, if only slightly different. For example, belief in political system. It is a huge red flag, if someone claiming to be opposition still maintains that political systems are real and elections do actually matter.

That all said, I do like James Corbett. Sure, he very well might be controlled, but out of the whole bunch he's one of the most insightful. I also like that he doesn't go off on various wild tangents. One could say he's kind of a normie friendly conspiracy theorist. He doesn't make normies flinch (like Alex Jones definitely does, for example). In any case, even if he is controlled op, it's quite high level disinfo.