Right off the bat this smuggles the assumption higher frequency is better than lower frequency. This is like saying a low A is worse than a high A note. Why would that be? Because low frequencies may cause you to shit your pants (brown note)?

Then the list you present has nothing to do with the actual resonance frequencies of the materials. Anyone familiar with acoustics knows looser strings produce a lower frequency (considering they're have the same girth). Well, it just happens that cotton, wool and linen strands are much looser than synthetic strands like polyester, meaning the latter have a higher frequency. I'm talking about individual strands because there's no way to evaluate precise frequency of a woven fabric due to its structure. Then consider that the human body resonates at 5–10 Hz so according to your list, synthetic fabrics would suit it better.

Again, bs new age mumbo-jumbo masquerading as actual science by borrowing terms and getting wild with them. It's pseudoscience.

Right off the bat this smuggles the assumption higher frequency is better than lower frequency. This is like saying a low A is worse than a high A note. Why would that be? Because low frequencies may cause you to shit your pants (brown note)?

Then the list you present has nothing to do with the actual resonance frequencies of the materials. Anyone familiar with acoustics knows looser strings produce a lower frequency (considering they're have the same girth). Well, it just happens that cotton, wool and linen strands are much looser than synthetic strands like polyester, meaning the latter have a higher frequency. I'm talking about individual strands because there's no way to evaluate precise frequency of a woven fabric due to its structure. Then consider that the human body resonates at 5–10 Hz so according to your list, synthetic fabrics would suit it better.

Again, bs new age mumbo-jumbo about masquerading as actual science by borrowing terms and getting wild with them. It's pseudoscience.