I explained enough about Antarctica. I don't know, can't tell what is true or not

What you said was that you agree with the theory of the ice wall because of a number of other conclusions you can make, and implied that there is something that you saw yourself that helps staple your support of the theory. Whether or not there is an ice wall has nothing to do with a curve, or where stars are in the sky. Those things can exist whether there is an ice wall or not. If those are the conclusions you made that helps solidify your support of the ice wall, then they're not very convincing

I would hardly say you've explained enough. You couldn't drop the topic fast enough.

I can only confirm with observation and scienctific method.

So what have you confirmed so far, in regards to Antarctica? Anything at all?

The questions tallestskil asked

Are not my questions, so they aren't the questions I'm choosing to ask.

And why have you resisted looking up a "flat earth" proof so adamantly?

I'm not sure what you're asking me to look up. It seems you want me to ask a specific question and, at this point, I'm not sure what that question is.

Again, drop Antarctica and dinosaurs for now, first, you have to be confident that we are not in space on a globe

Sure, let me ask you something unrelated to that.

The sun is above us, that much we know. On a flat earth, that would mean that the sun is above us at all times (as opposed to the globe theory, where the earth rotates to face away from the sun every 24 hours).

However, the sun is not visible to us during the nighttime. We know, from the behavior of light, that even if we are not illuminated by a light source we would still be able to see the source (such as seeing a lit candle on the other end of an empty gymnasium, for instance).

Why is it that the sun appears to set, instead of remaining up in our field of view?

I explained enough about Antarctica. I don't know, can't tell what is true or not

What you said was that you agree with the theory of the ice wall because of a number of other conclusions you can make, and implied that there is something that you saw yourself that helps staple your support of the theory. Whether or not there is an ice wall has nothing to do with a curve, or where stars are in the sky. Those things can exist whether there is an ice wall or not.

I would hardly say you've explained enough. You couldn't drop the topic fast enough.

I can only confirm with observation and scienctific method.

So what have you confirmed so far, in regards to Antarctica? Anything at all?

The questions tallestskil asked

Are not my questions, so they aren't the questions I'm choosing to ask.

And why have you resisted looking up a "flat earth" proof so adamantly?

I'm not sure what you're asking me to look up. It seems you want me to ask a specific question and, at this point, I'm not sure what that question is.

Again, drop Antarctica and dinosaurs for now, first, you have to be confident that we are not in space on a globe

Sure, let me ask you something unrelated to that.

The sun is above us, that much we know. On a flat earth, that would mean that the sun is above us at all times (as opposed to the globe theory, where the earth rotates to face away from the sun every 24 hours).

However, the sun is not visible to us during the nighttime. We know, from the behavior of light, that even if we are not illuminated by a light source we would still be able to see the source (such as seeing a lit candle on the other end of an empty gymnasium, for instance).

Why is it that the sun appears to set, instead of remaining up in our field of view?