Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.
  1. It's not my assumption. Perhaps you should have consulted the Bible before quoting from it. This is the advice Jesus gave specifically to his Apostles as he was sending them out to proselytise. This needn't be a point of debate - you can just go consult the text you were quoting from..

I'm sorry but I don't think you are really engaging in good faith here at all. Hoping to cast doubt on whether I'm being logical et al and trying to reduce what I say down to me making 'assumptions'. No, what I'm doing here is pointing out what the Bible itself says, thats all, and demonstrating to you that it is not for you but against you. You should be attempting to play the ball and not the man.

The 'dogs' in both of those examples DO refer to the gentiles. You can assert otherwise, but at least show your working.

261 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.
  1. It's not my assumption. Perhaps you should have consulted the Bible before quoting from it. This is the advice Jesus gave specifically to his Apostles as he was sending them out to proselytise. This needn't be a point of debate - you can just go consult the text you were quoting from..

I'm sorry but I don't think you are really engaging in good faith here at all. Hoping to cast doubt on whether I'm being logical et al and trying to reduce what I say down to me making 'assumptions'. No, what I'm doing here is pointing out what the Bible itself says, thats all, and demonstrating to you that it is not for you but against you.

The 'dogs' in both of those examples DO refer to the gentiles. You can assert otherwise, but at least show your working.

261 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original
  1. It's not my assumption. Perhaps you should have consulted the Bible before quoting from it. This is the advice Jesus specifically to his Apostles as he was sending them out to proselytise. This needn't be a point of debate - you can just go consult the text you were quoting from..

I'm sorry but I don't think you are really engaging in good faith here at all. Hoping to cast doubt on whether I'm being logical et al and trying to reduce what I say down to me making 'assumptions'. No, what I'm doing here is pointing out what the Bible itself says, thats all, and demonstrating to you that it is not for you but against you.

The 'dogs' in both of those examples DO refer to the gentiles. You can assert otherwise, but at least show your working.

261 days ago
1 score