You see, right there. You say it's well-known. Like a robot. You actually don't know. The truth is, you can read about how WEAK the physics actually is for nuclear explosions. Fission, sure. Explosion, the math is shit, it's been tested and proven impossible.

This is a claim you probably would expect would not be supported on Wikipedia. I hope you realize this. Is this a forum for debate? No. Is this a forum for research? No. This is just a place where people can have some fun and share ideas. The idea you have now, that someone can make such an extremely bold claim and say there are books about this ..should warrant inquisition, if you are truly unafraid of your own intellect. Harbor the idea and challenge your foundations. You can always drop it if you think the math for nuclean explosions is sounds after hearing educated explainations of why it's not.

I don't want to keep sharing sources. I do and then I find it harder to find next time someone looks. They are scrubbing the internet of more valuable pieces of evidence. You look for a book called Death Object. By Akio Nakatasi.

I bet if you tried, you could figure out the argument against nuclear explosion physics. Just try harder. Don't just accept the main stream science, they are institutionalized tools, compartmentalized knowledge, separated details that are masterminded by shithead leaders at the top of CIA and shit. You have no hope of finding a source that will confirm what I am telling you is true. You have to look at their claims, test their theory, mathematically. And you have to analyze their evidence, did you really see a nuke explode in those old movies. Why was Hiroshima able to drive cars immediately after, grow trees, agriculture and rebuild after a fucking nuclear bomb. Use common sense. We were all tricked. So what.

You see, right there. You say it's well-known. Like a robot. You actually don't know. The truth is, you can read about how WEAK the physics actually is for nuclear explosions. Fission, sure. Explosion, the math is shit, it's been tested and proven impossible.

There are claims you probably would expect would not be supported on Wikipedia. I hope you realize this

I don't know you so I don't like sharing information that just gets used to scrub the internet of more valuable pieces of evidence.

I bet if you tried you could figure out the argument against nuclear explosion physics. Just try harder