Let's look at the gotquestions.org you cited. First I have no idea who created that website and if they are truly opposed to Catholicism and all its evils.

Secondly I read every single quotation that supposedly showed Peter was their "spokesman" and they proved no such thing.

Being a natural-born leader, Peter became the de facto spokesman for the Twelve (Matthew 15:15, 18:21, 19:27; Mark 11:21; Luke 8:45, 12:41; John 6:68, 13:6-9, 36).

You can hover over each quote yourself. They don't prove anything except that Peter spoke to Jesus and sometimes used the term "we".

If you wanted to show leadership after Jesus had that talk with Peter, it would be in the books subsequent to Christ's crucifixion and resurrection. Notice no such quote was cited.

So again, you are not acting rationally. This is just a rationalization to support a saint murdering anti-Christ religion.

Let's look at the gotquestions.org you cited. First I have no idea who created that website and if they are truly opposed to Catholicism and all its evils.

Secondly I read every single quotation that supposedly showed Peter was their "spokesman" and they proved no such thing.

Being a natural-born leader, Peter became the de facto spokesman for the Twelve (Matthew 15:15, 18:21, 19:27; Mark 11:21; Luke 8:45, 12:41; John 6:68, 13:6-9, 36).

You can hover over each quote yourself. They don't prove anything except that Peter spoke to Jesus and sometimes used the term "we".

If you wanted to show leadership after Jesus had that talk with Peter, it would be in the books subsequent to Christ's crucifixion and resurrection. Notice no such quote was cited.

So again, you are not acting rationally. This is just a rationalization to support a saint murdering anti-Christ religion. What kind of brother are you? You not only preach false teachings, but support the murder of true born again believers which your church is guilty of.