This is gnosticism and I adhere to the Christian doctrines of God and the creation. You intermix Christianity with eastern mysticism into your idiosyncratic new age system but those beliefs are incompatible. The most obvious problem is Christianity is not dualistic and there's no reincarnation of the soul. Then there's the problem with the world being created knowable through God's energies and not as a great illusion like in Hinduism or some twisted game for God's enjoyment. Things get more subtle with the "battle between good and evil". Evil is uncreated - it is only defined by the negation of the good (who is God), much like how darkness is the absence of light. So God is not battling anyone, because He's the only omnipotent uncreated being there is. Satan is closer to our human nature than to the divine nature. He was already beaten before our creation. He is evil because he rebelled against God and leads people away from Him to their death. He was not created evil but became such by rejecting God by his free will (just like anyone who does the same).

Do I have to point out the whole gender switching thing sounds troons as hell? I'm pretty sure the globalists push weird beliefs like that through theosophy, which is based on illuminism, and that is based on kabbalism (see Lucis Trust, the UN publishing agency).

But the most obvious problem is - how do you know any of this is true? I mean, you get very specific with your gender calculus.

This is gnosticism and I adhere to the Christian doctrines of God and the creation. You intermix Christianity with eastern mysticism into your idiosyncratic new age system but those beliefs are incompatible. The most obvious problem is Christianity is not dualistic and there's no reincarnation of the soul. Then there's the problem with the world being created knowable through God's energies and not as a great illusion like in Hinduism or some twisted game for God's enjoyment. Things get more subtle with the "battle between good and evil". Evil is uncreated - it is only defined by the negation of the good (who is God), much like how darkness is the absence of light. So God is not battling anyone, because He's the only omnipotent uncreated being there is. Satan is closer to our human nature than to the divine nature. He was already beaten before our creation. He is evil because he rebelled against God and leads people away from Him to their death.

Do I have to point out the whole gender switching thing sounds troons as hell? I'm pretty sure the globalists push weird beliefs like that through theosophy, which is based on illuminism, and that is based on kabbalism (see Lucis Trust, the UN publishing agency).

But the most obvious problem is - how do you know any of this is true? I mean, you get very specific with your gender calculus.

This is gnosticism and I adhere to the Christian doctrines of God and the creation. You intermix Christianity with eastern mysticism into your idiosyncratic new age system but those beliefs are incompatible. The most obvious problem is Christianity is not dualistic and there's no reincarnation of the soul. Then there's the problem with the world being created knowable through God's energies and not as a great illusion like in Hinduism or some twisted game for God's enjoyment. Things get more subtle with the "battle between good and evil". Evil is uncreated - it is only defined by the negation of the good (who is God), much like how darkness is the absence of light. So God is not battling anyone, because He's the only omnipotent uncreated being there is. Satan is closer to our human nature than to the divine nature. He was already beaten before our creation.

Do I have to point out the whole gender switching thing sounds troons as hell? I'm pretty sure the globalists push weird beliefs like that through theosophy, which is based on illuminism, and that is based on kabbalism (see Lucis Trust, the UN publishing agency).

But the most obvious problem is - how do you know any of this is true? I mean, you get very specific with your gender calculus.