How do you know they helped you and that they didn't cause/won't cause health problems? And even if your personal experience is positive, why do you assume they are good for all?

You fail to see the fundamental problem - something being tested long term means shit when the people testing it have no qualms about killing millions of people. Those people had two licenses for the Pfizer vaccine - one for getting past the trial (which still was bad) and one for mass deployment which causes heart disease and turbo cancers. This is all on paper. They can easily do the same with any other vaccine.

How do you know they helped you and that they didn't cause/won't cause health problems? And even if your personal experience is positive, why do you assume they are good for all?

You fail to see the fundamental problem - something being tested long term means shit when the people testing it have no qualms about killing millions of people.

How do you know they helped you and that they didn't cause/won't cause health problems? And even if your personal experience is positive, why do you assume they are good for all?

You fail to see the fundamental problem - something being tested long term means shit when the people testing it have no qualms about killing millions of people. Why do you trust the regulatory process?