You can only get truth by observation and experience.

Is this proposition true? Did you arrive to that truth through observation and experience?

If those fail you, you will make a deception into truth

What tells you your observation and experience is more true than someone else's observation and experience? How do you evaluate who is closer to the objective truth of the matter and how do you even have knowledge of that objective truth under your worldview?

Doing things because you can is the only good reason to do stuff. Helping other, learning new things, making the world better, working hard just to sweat or just to look good and catch more pussy.

Ok, enough Andrew Tate for this guy. Just don't start reading the Quran now.

Searching for truth also means changing, because as you learn you get refine.

Is truth subject to change and if not how so when everything in the experienced world is constantly changing?

Unlike you, who prefers not to investigate or challenge their world view because it fits their truth for the lack of a better way.

Lol, all of my questions are at the meta level and are challenges to any worldview there is. My worldview can justify truth, knowledge and meaning through God's existence. You were the one who started talking about universal objective truth and I asked you how it is justified under your worldview. You answered "through observance and experience" which is basic bitch empiricism that has been refuted hundreds of years ago by the likes of Hume and Kant.

I know we have a soul because I can feel it, hear it, know it. And I've read enough NDE books to see many confirmations from other people too.

What if you're deluding yourself and you're just a complex organic mechanism of inputs and outputs? Can't feelings be deceiving? People feel they are the opposite sex - are they really?

I studied the bible for years. You are church talking to me. But what if God as you know it, is a not real?

Then you'd have to present me with a worldview that accounts for everything we assume in our reality. What would that alternative be, is it coherent, logical and are there good reasons to believe in it?

What if we were planted here and grown into a profitable crop, for entertainment as slave away and they enjoy our money. Religions might be created just to keep us from uniting across geographies.

That's a funny "what if" but it doesn't make up a worldview. The word "religion" literally translates to "to bind together" from latin. People unite over some conviction they hold in common. There are people united in their faith in Christ all over the globe. Common faith in something unites - lack of faith or everyone having a different belief system divides.

You can only get truth by observation and experience.

Is this proposition true? Did you arrive to that truth through observation and experience?

If those fail you, you will make a deception into truth

What tells you your observation and experience is more true than someone else's observation and experience? How do you evaluate who is closer to the objective truth of the matter and how do you even have knowledge of that objective truth under your worldview?

Doing things because you can is the only good reason to do stuff. Helping other, learning new things, making the world better, working hard just to sweat or just to look good and catch more pussy.

Ok, enough Andrew Tate for this guy. Just don't start reading the Quran now.

Searching for truth also means changing, because as you learn you get refine. It's your responsibility to be aware. Like covid vax. If you weren't aware, you probably gonna due of blood clots or super cancer.

Is truth subject to change and if not how so when everything in the experienced world is constantly changing?

Unlike you, who prefers not to investigate or challenge their world view because it fits their truth for the lack of a better way.

Lol, all of my questions are at the meta level and are challenges to any worldview there is. My worldview can justify truth, knowledge and meaning through God's existence. You were the one who started talking about universal objective truth and I asked you how it is justified under your worldview. You answered "through observance and experience" which is basic bitch empiricism that has been refuted hundreds of years ago by the likes of Hume and Kant.

I know we have a soul because I can feel it, hear it, know it. And I've read enough NDE books to see many confirmations from other people too.

What if you're deluding yourself and you're just a complex organic mechanism of inputs and outputs? Can't feelings be deceiving? People feel they are the opposite sex - are they really?

I studied the bible for years. You are church talking to me. But what if God as you know it, is a not real?

Then you'd have to present me with a worldview that accounts for everything we assume in our reality. What would that alternative be, is it coherent, logical and are there good reasons to believe in it?

What if we were planted here and grown into a profitable crop, for entertainment as slave away and they enjoy our money. Religions might be created just to keep us from uniting across geographies.

That's a funny "what if" but it doesn't make up a worldview. The word "religion" literally translates to "to bind together" from latin. People unite over some conviction they hold in common. There are people united in their faith in Christ all over the globe. Common faith in something unites - lack of faith or everyone having a different belief system divides.