Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

It still makes no sense, since they are doing the opposite of their intended purpose. You alert them by having a weird glitch specific to only a few people who are on your list.

If they wanted to avoid tipping people off they would merely say what they know about that person and omit anything about being on the watch list. Also if them being on a watch list is already public information, the cat is out of the bag that way already.

Moreover I can write the entire Rothschild name "Let's talk about David Mayer De Rothschild" and it glitches. No way it is that stupid that it can't tell the difference.

It's an interesting excuse for what happened, but doesn't hold water.

23 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It still makes no sense, since they are doing the opposite of their intended purpose. You alert them by having a weird glitch specific to only a few people who are on your list.

If they wanted to avoid tipping people off they would merely say what they know about that person and omit anything about being on the watch list. Also if them being on a watch list is already public information, the cat is out of the bag that way already.

Moreover I can write the entire Rothschild name and it glitches. No way it is that stupid that it can't tell the difference.

It's an interesting excuse for what happened, but doesn't hold water.

23 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It still makes no sense, since they are doing the opposite of their intended purpose. You alert them by having a weird glitch specific to only a few people who are on your list.

If they wanted to avoid tipping people off they would merely say what they know about that person and omit anything about being on the watch list. Also if them being on a watch list is already public information, the cat is out of the bag that way already.

It's an interesting excuse for what happened, but doesn't hold water.

23 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It still makes no sense, since they are doing the opposite of their intended purpose. You alert them by having a weird glitch specific to only a few people who are on your list.

If they wanted to avoid tipping people off they would merely say what they know about that person and omit anything about being on the watch list. Also if them being on a watch list is already public information, the cat is out of the bag that way already.

So your explanation is bullshit.

23 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It still makes no sense to me, since they are doing the opposite of their intended purpose. You alert them by having a weird glitch specific to only a few people who are on your list.

If they wanted to avoid tipping people off they would merely say what they know about that person and omit anything about being on the watch list. Also if them being on a watch list is already public information, the cat is out of the bag that way already.

So your explanation is bullshit.

23 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It still makes no sense to me, since they are doing the opposite of their intended purpose. You alert them by having a weird glitch specific to only a few people who are on your list.

If they wanted to avoid tipping people off they would merely say what they know about that person and omit anything about being on the watch list. Also if them being on a watch list is already public information, the cat is out of the bag that way too.

23 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

It still makes no sense to me as they are doing the opposite of their intended purpose. You alert them by having a weird glitch specific to only a few people who are on your list.

If they wanted to avoid tipping people off they would merely say what they know about that person and omit anything about being on the watch list. Also if them being on a watch list is already public information, the cat is out of the bag that way too.

23 days ago
1 score