I've gone from being...to having to

A being cannot have/own/possess inwards...only express potential outwards.

You'll eventually notice that changing sides within a conflict of reason (for vs against) doesn't impact the outcome of a suggestion (Connor McGregor).

A jew suggests Connor McGregor fighting within a ring, to tempt consenting gentiles to reason from outside whose gonna win or lose. Simultaneously a jew suggests narratives including Connor McGregor to establish a ring (circular logic) within each consenting gentiles mind/memory, as to manipulate both sides within the resulting conflict of reason (for vs against) among gentiles.

A gentile is being tricked to believe that consent given (to buy) implies possession gained over suggested (to sell)...while ignoring that perception (life) within perceivable (inception towards death) cannot hold onto anything.

we are to believe

WE implies ones (singular) belief in suggested pluralism. Holding onto such an -ism tempts one to ignore the implication of TO aka being (life) moved from inception TOWARDS death.

Be-lieve implies BEING LEAVING...the state of being.

who lied...in order to

A lie can only be shaped within the natural order moving life from inception TOWARDS death. A shaped lie or truth tempts one to believe aka to hold onto the suggested shape, while fighting (reason) within a ring (circular logic) about the meaning thereof.

The ongoing natural order doesn't stop for the temporary chaos within choosing to fight each other over fiction, while ignoring reality.

seen all over CCTV

a) If it's a CLOSED CIRCUIT telling a vision, then how did ones sight get in it?

b) How could such a closed circuit represent ALL if each ONEs sight operates outside of it?

c) Is it ones sight when looking at visions told (TV) in shapes within a closed circuit by another?

to have sex

How could one have/own/possess...sex/seco/divide...if it implies a separation from one another?

Yes I agree

Implies tethering self to the following conflicts of reason...YES vs NO; I vs YOU, and AGREE vs DISAGREE.

What a commitment for one to fight in three different conflicts simultaneously...would Connor McGregor commit to such odds?

I've gone from being...to having to

A being cannot have/own/possess inwards...only express potential outwards.

You'll eventually notice that changing sides within a conflict of reason (for vs against) doesn't impact the outcome of a suggestion (Connor McGregor).

A jew suggests Connor McGregor fighting within a ring, to tempt consenting gentiles to reason from outside whose gonna win or lose. Simultaneously a jew suggests narratives including Connor McGregor to establish a ring (circular logic) within each consenting gentiles mind/memory, as to manipulate both sides within the resulting conflict of reason (for vs against) among gentiles.

A gentile is being tricked to believe that consent given (to buy) implies possession gained over suggested (to sell)...while ignoring that perception (life) within perceivable (inception towards death) cannot hold onto anything.

we are to believe

WE implies ones (singular) belief in suggested pluralism. Holding onto such an -ism tempts one to ignore the implication of TO aka being (life) moved from inception TOWARDS death.

Be-lieve implies BEING LEAVING...the state of being.

who lied...in order to

A lie can only be shaped within the natural order moving life from inception TOWARDS death. A shaped lie or truth tempts one to believe aka to hold onto the suggested shape, while fighting (reason) within a ring (circular logic) about the meaning thereof.

The ongoing natural order doesn't stop for the temporary chaos within choosing to fight each other over fiction, while ignoring reality.

seen all over CCTV

a) If it's a CLOSED CIRCUIT telling a vision, then how did ones sight get in it?

b) How could such a closed circuit represent ALL if each ONEs sight operates outside of it?

c) Is it ones sight when looking at visions told (TV) as shapes within a closed circuit by another?

to have sex

How could one have/own/possess...sex/seco/divide...if it implies a separation from one another?

Yes I agree

Implies tethering self to the following conflicts of reason...YES vs NO; I vs YOU, and AGREE vs DISAGREE.

What a commitment for one to fight in three different conflicts simultaneously...would Connor McGregor commit to such odds?