Do you understand "that all scientific theory and progress in history involves a recognition that certain phenomena remain unexplained

I reject your claim that "supernatural" only refers to things that are not understood.

The true definition of supernatural is something that is not bound by the laws of nature. And it's pretty damn transparent you are afraid to talk about that definition of "supernatural".

Your religion teaches that god literally crafted the entire universe according to his will, and exists outside of space and time. That is an appeal to the supernatural, not an appeal to the unknown.

What do you wish to gain from a conversation where you ask questions but demur at the answers?

I asked you how to settle disagreements on biblical interpretations and you spent like 5 comments changing the subject to talk about things where people already agree.

I asked you about Mormons, Catholics, and Jehovah's Witnesses and you changed the subject to talk about Eastern Orthodox Christians.

I asked you about the claim that your god exists beyond nature, space and time, and you changed the subject to "the unexplained".

You've spent the entire conversation changing the subject and avoiding every point I've made. And I'm honestly done with it.

Now if you want to continue this conversation at all you must answer this question directly with no more games. If your reply doesn't contain a direct answer this is the last you will hear from me.

Is your god bound by the laws of nature? Yes or no?

Do you understand "that all scientific theory and progress in history involves a recognition that certain phenomena remain unexplained

I reject your claim that "supernatural" only refers to things that are not understood.

The true definition of supernatural is something that is not bound by the laws of nature. And it's pretty damn transparent you are afraid to talk about that definition of "supernatural".

Your religion teaches that god literally crafted the entire universe according to his will, and exists outside of space and time. That is an appeal to the supernatural, not an appeal to the unknown.

What do you wish to gain from a conversation where you ask questions but demur at the answers?

I asked you how to settle disagreements on biblical interpretations and you spent like 5 comments changing the subject to talk about things where people already agree.

I asked you about Mormons, Catholics, and Jehovah's Witnesses and you changed the subject to talk about Eastern Orthodox Christians.

I asked you about the claim that your god exists beyond nature, space and time, and you changed the subject to "the unexplained".

You've spent the entire conversation changing the subject and avoiding every point I've made. And I'm honestly done with it.

Now if you want to continue this conversation at all you must answer this question directly with no more games. If your reply doesn't contain a direct answer this is the last you will hear from me.

Is your god bound by the laws of nature? Yes or no?

Do you understand "that all scientific theory and progress in history involves a recognition that certain phenomena remain unexplained

I reject your claim that "supernatural" only refers to things that are not understood.

The true definition of supernatural is something that is not bound by the laws of nature.

Your religion teaches that god literally crafted the entire universe according to his will, and exists outside of space and time. That is an appeal to the supernatural, not an appeal to the unknown.

What do you wish to gain from a conversation where you ask questions but demur at the answers?

I asked you how to settle disagreements on biblical interpretations and you spent like 5 comments changing the subject to talk about things where people already agree.

I asked you about Mormons, Catholics, and Jehovah's Witnesses and you changed the subject to talk about Eastern Orthodox Christians.

I asked you about the claim that your god exists beyond nature, space and time, and you changed the subject to "the unexplained".

You've spent the entire conversation changing the subject and avoiding every point I've made. And I'm honestly done with it.

Now if you want to continue this conversation at all you must answer this question directly with no more games. If your reply doesn't contain a direct answer this is the last you will hear from me.

Is your god bound by the laws of nature? Yes or no?

Do you understand "that all scientific theory and progress in history involves a recognition that certain phenomena remain unexplained

I reject your claim that "supernatural" only refers to things that are not understood. Your religion teaches that god literally crafted the entire universe according to his will, and exists outside of space and time.

That is literally a description of a being that supersedes nature, and is thus SUPERNATURAL.

What do you wish to gain from a conversation where you ask questions but demur at the answers?

I asked you how to settle disagreements on biblical interpretations and you spent like 5 comments changing the subject to talk about things where people already agree.

I asked you about Mormons, Catholics, and Jehovah's Witnesses and you changed the subject to talk about Eastern Orthodox Christians.

I asked you about the claim that your god exists beyond nature, space and time, and you changed the subject to "the unexplained".

You've spent the entire conversation changing the subject and avoiding every point I've made. And I'm honestly done with it.

Now if you want to continue this conversation at all you must answer this question directly with no more games. If your reply doesn't contain a direct answer this is the last you will hear from me.

#Is your god bound by the laws of nature? Yes or no?