Most all the 50,000 denominations agree on the essentials of following Jesus, and admit each other to be true followers.

Would Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Catholics say they are all true followers of the same Jesus?

Most all denominations agree broadly with such elements in verifying such knowledge.

Then how come you refused to verify anything when i asked?

Do you wish to make good on your pursuit of truth by treating me as a person who can be persuaded to greater truth than I already have? If there's no god, I'd want to know that, wouldn't I?

Just because you WANT to know something doesn't mean you can. When someone makes an unfalsifiable claim with no way to ever verify it, I think the logical thing to do is disregard them.

The lack of evidence against their claim doesn't demonstrate anything other than that the claim is of such a baseless nature that it's impossible to gather even the slightest bit of evidence either way.

Just cause you want to know the nature of the universe doesn't mean you get to know. Just because you pretend to know doesn't mean you do.

I don't think I know the answers, But I've seen enough to disregard the one you are putting forward about a sentient magic supernatural being who created the universe for fun.

Most all the 50,000 denominations agree on the essentials of following Jesus, and admit each other to be true followers.

Would Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Catholics say they are all true followers of the same Jesus?

Most all denominations agree broadly with such elements in verifying such knowledge.

Then how come you refused to verify anything when i asked?

Do you wish to make good on your pursuit of truth by treating me as a person who can be persuaded to greater truth than I already have? If there's no god, I'd want to know that, wouldn't I?

Just because you WANT to know something doesn't mean you can. When someone makes an unfalsifiable claim with no way to ever verify it, I think the logical thing to do is disregard them.

The lack of evidence against their claim doesn't demonstrate anything other than that the claim is of such a baseless nature that it's impossible to gather even the slightest bit of evidence either way.

Just cause you want to know the nature the universe doesn't mean you get to know. Just because you pretend to know doesn't mean you do.

I don't think I know the answers, But I've seen enough to disregard the one you are putting forward about a sentient magic supernatural being who created the universe for fun.

Most all the 50,000 denominations agree on the essentials of following Jesus, and admit each other to be true followers.

Would Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Catholics say they are all true followers of the same Jesus?

Most all denominations agree broadly with such elements in verifying such knowledge.

Then how come you refused to verify anything when i asked?

Do you wish to make good on your pursuit of truth by treating me as a person who can be persuaded to greater truth than I already have? If there's no god, I'd want to know that, wouldn't I?

You did fall into a trap by changing my definition from "unexplained" to "supernatural".

You believe in a god that literally supersedes natural law, because you think he created it.

Just because you WANT to know something doesn't mean you can. When someone makes an unfalsifiable claim with no way to ever verify it, I think the logical thing to do is disregard them.

The lack of evidence against their claim doesn't demonstrate anything other than that the claim is of such a baseless nature that it's impossible to gather even the slightest bit of evidence either way.

Just cause you want to know the nature the universe doesn't mean you get to know. Just because you pretend to know doesn't mean you do.

I don't think I know the answers, But I've seen enough to disregard the one you are putting forward about a sentient magic supernatural being who created the universe for fun.

Most all the 50,000 denominations agree on the essentials of following Jesus, and admit each other to be true followers.

Would Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Catholics say they are all true followers of the same Jesus?

Most all denominations agree broadly with such elements in verifying such knowledge.

Then how come you refused to verify anything when i asked?

Do you wish to make good on your pursuit of truth by treating me as a person who can be persuaded to greater truth than I already have? If there's no god, I'd want to know that, wouldn't I?

Just because you WANT to know something doesn't mean you can. When someone makes an unfalsifiable claim with no way to ever verify it, I think the logical thing to do is disregard them.

The lack of evidence against their claim doesn't demonstrate anything other than that the claim is of such a baseless nature that it's impossible to gather even the slightest bit of evidence either way.

Just cause you want to know the nature the universe doesn't mean you get to know. Just because you pretend to know doesn't mean you do.

I don't think I know the answers, But I've seen enough to disregard the one you are putting forward about a sentient magic supernatural being who created the universe for fun.