For the state - yes.

So why should the state treat men and women the same in they are different in reality? Shouldn't the state be based on reality?

No. Again, men and women have equal rights in Russia for more than a century. I do not observe any noticeable gender role shift. Being able to realise some right does not mean you have to. So men and women do their choices, what rights they want to realise, and what they don't want. Men can work as nurse, but only few do that. Women can serve in military, but only few do that. When conscious of people is not poisoned by all that jewish perversions (career, selfishness, ultimate competition with everybody including your own family, anti-merit crap, praising degeneracy and so on,), equal rights for men and women could not do any harm.

Russia and the Eastern bloc (I'm from one such country) are lagging because Stalinism was conservative and the iron curtain along with deep rooted Christian orthodox morality and tradition, which is very patriarchal, held western cultural revolutions at bay. The relative conservatism we witness in our countries is due to the lack of common market with the west until the 90's. But we're catching up and society is getting more liberal and women are more emancipated (especially in the big cities). Russia is going their own way and this may reverse some of those trends but my country is in the EU and there's a strong western influence, despite the general population being against it and pro-Russia (mostly due to communist nostalgia). The funny thing is both sides believe Russia is the same as the USSR and they either love them or hate them for that.

Hypothetically, you could grant equal rights but there needs to be a certain type of government, economy and society if you want the scenario you described. This is untenable in any civilized modern society I can think of mostly because of globalism and the mono-culture. Even if some government like say China can pull it off, they'd rather have women in the workforce too and not at home caring for children. That's one of the reasons such totalitarian regimes prefer feminism and communal raising of kids over the big traditional family which was characteristic for China and Russia. There are other reasons such as control and indoctrination but that's the purely economical one.

Imagine you have son and daughter. If you love them equally, does that mean you obliged to dress them in same clothes and buy them same toys? Is equal love to both of your children somehow bad?

Jews do simple thing. They replace meaning and usage of "equality" with their insane meaning and usage. In Russian we have two different words - "равенство" and "уравниловка". First means "equality" like in mathematical sense, and second means "make everything the same, regardless of any circumstances". Kikes replaced first, initial meaning of "equality" with second one. And you bought it.

I am well aware of the distinctions you bring up. We're back at the everlasting problem of what a government should be at all. I believe a government should represent the divine order and hierarchy here on Earth because that's the ultimate reality. Which means it should be a monarchy, since the Trinity is monarchical and Christ is the King of Kings. Moreover, I already wrote men and women's roles and duties should be informed by the same principles given to us by the Lord.

If one goes the atheist route, there's really nothing to base government on - it all becomes arbitrary and a matter of preference. A sandbox, which leads to the insane regimes we got after the monarchies were toppled. You think everyone should have equal rights, but others may think otherwise and in the end what you get is Darwinian rule of the most powerful, or realpolitik (which usually is the jew).

And that "communism" thing. Communism is inevitable. Not in jewish, marxist sense, but more like in Star Trek. If humans will survive that clown world and defeat those bastards, sooner or later that replicators will be created. When human being will have everything he need to live, there will be no any sense in money and all that capitalism stuff. Values will shift to usefulness for others, knowledge, goodness, skills and so on. You know, that's how Johannes' Revelation ends. I hope you don't think that there will be capitalism with all that stocks, profits and money making under the ruling of Jesus and Saints :) Mindblowing, isn't it?

It's not. This is the biggest jewish lie of all. Jews invented communism, this is their kingdom of the Antichrist and they've been trying at it since the 1600's. It seems it's about to finally work now and make them masters of the world. I think it's inevitable but whenever they succeed, their rule will be short-lived and Christ will come blazing.

Communism is an inversion of the Christian idea of Eden that the jews want to enact on Earth (utopia) so in a sense you're right - there will be no property, profits or capital in the Kingdom of God, because it won't be material or worldly in any sense :)

For the state - yes.

So why should the state treat men and women the same in they are different in reality? Shouldn't the state be based on reality?

No. Again, men and women have equal rights in Russia for more than a century. I do not observe any noticeable gender role shift. Being able to realise some right does not mean you have to. So men and women do their choices, what rights they want to realise, and what they don't want. Men can work as nurse, but only few do that. Women can serve in military, but only few do that. When conscious of people is not poisoned by all that jewish perversions (career, selfishness, ultimate competition with everybody including your own family, anti-merit crap, praising degeneracy and so on,), equal rights for men and women could not do any harm.

Russia and the Eastern bloc (I'm from one such country) are lagging because Stalinism was conservative and the iron curtain along with deep rooted Christian orthodox morality and tradition, which is very patriarchal, held western cultural revolutions at bay. The relative conservatism we witness in our countries is due to the lack of common market with the west until the 90's. But we're catching up and society is getting more liberal and women are more emancipated (especially in the big cities). Russia is going their own way and this may reverse some of those trends but my country is in the EU and there's a strong western influence, despite the general population being against and pro-Russia (mostly due to communist nostalgia). The funny thing is both sides believe Russia is the same as the USSR and they either love them or hate them for that.

Hypothetically, you could grant equal rights but there needs to be a certain type of government, economy and society if you want the scenario you described. This is untenable in any civilized modern society I can think of mostly because of globalism and the mono-culture. Even if some government like say China can pull it off, they'd rather have women in the workforce too and not at home caring for children. That's one of the reasons such totalitarian regimes prefer feminism and communal raising of kids over the big traditional family which was characteristic for China and Russia. There are other reasons such as control and indoctrination but that's the purely economical one.

Imagine you have son and daughter. If you love them equally, does that mean you obliged to dress them in same clothes and buy them same toys? Is equal love to both of your children somehow bad?

Jews do simple thing. They replace meaning and usage of "equality" with their insane meaning and usage. In Russian we have two different words - "равенство" and "уравниловка". First means "equality" like in mathematical sense, and second means "make everything the same, regardless of any circumstances". Kikes replaced first, initial meaning of "equality" with second one. And you bought it.

I am well aware of the distinctions you bring up. We're back at the everlasting problem of what a government should be at all. I believe a government should represent the divine order and hierarchy here on Earth because that's the ultimate reality. Which means it should be a monarchy, since the Trinity is monarchical and Christ is the King of Kings. Moreover, I already wrote men and women's roles and duties should be informed by the same principles given to us by the Lord.

If one goes the atheist route, there's really nothing to base government on - it all becomes arbitrary and a matter of preference. A sandbox, which leads to the insane regimes we got after the monarchies were toppled. You think everyone should have equal rights, but others may think otherwise and in the end what you get is Darwinian rule of the most powerful, or realpolitik (which usually is the jew).

And that "communism" thing. Communism is inevitable. Not in jewish, marxist sense, but more like in Star Trek. If humans will survive that clown world and defeat those bastards, sooner or later that replicators will be created. When human being will have everything he need to live, there will be no any sense in money and all that capitalism stuff. Values will shift to usefulness for others, knowledge, goodness, skills and so on. You know, that's how Johannes' Revelation ends. I hope you don't think that there will be capitalism with all that stocks, profits and money making under the ruling of Jesus and Saints :) Mindblowing, isn't it?

It's not. This is the biggest jewish lie of all. Jews invented communism, this is their kingdom of the Antichrist and they've been trying at it since the 1600's. It seems it's about to finally work now and make them masters of the world. I think it's inevitable but whenever they succeed, their rule will be short-lived and Christ will come blazing.

Communism is an inversion of the Christian idea of Eden that the jews want to enact on Earth (utopia) so in a sense you're right - there will be no property, profits or capital in the Kingdom of God, because it won't be material or worldly in any sense :)