Building a case for what? You have to actually define the charges before you can build a case.

I'm sure I did in my initial comment. You wanted me to provide evidence for that claim, remember?

Here was your claim though... "That jewish financial and zionist interests were behind much of what transpired throughout modern history (1600's onwards)"

But when asked for specifics to support your claim you brought up that Gavrilo Princep was a jew, Leon Trotsky was a jew, and mentioned zionism.

Do you see the problem there?

You presented three separate and distinct ideologies (Serbian Nationalism, Communism, and Zionism) as if they are connected parts of a greater whole.

And you're acting like it supports your claim of jews controlling history simply because some jews were adherents to each of those ideologies.

Nothing you have presented so far has supported the idea of there being a jewish conspiracy to lie and reshape 400+ years of history for their own ends.

Zionism IS the conspiracy

Zionism is not a conspiracy... People have conspired in favor of it, but it has always been public knowledge and argued for in the open, which means zionism itself is not a conspiracy.

I'd say zionism is not just about the establishment of the state of Israel. It's about the establishment of a jewish kingdom that would rule over the world

I've never heard them say that.... And I don't think Gavrilo Princep or Leon Trotsky being a jew supports that claim.

Ok.... I got one question I think it's really important for you to answer as it will shed light on some philosophical differences we might have.

Is it accurate and fair to describe the mafia as "An Italian conspiracy to rule New York"? Why or why not?

Building a case for what? You have to actually define the charges before you can build a case.

I'm sure I did in my initial comment. You wanted me to provide evidence for that claim, remember?

Here was your claim though... "That jewish financial and zionist interests were behind much of what transpired throughout modern history (1600's onwards)"

But when asked for specifics to support your claim you brought up that Gavrilo Princep was a jew, Leon Trotsky was a jew, and mentioned zionism.

Do you see the problem there?

You presented three separate and distinct ideologies (Serbian Nationalism, Communism, and Zionism) as if they are connected parts of a greater whole.

And you're acting like it supports your claim of jews controlling history simply because some jews were adherents to each of those ideologies.

Nothing you have presented so far has supported the idea of there being a jewish conspiracy to lie and reshape 400+ years of history for their own ends.

Zionism IS the conspiracy

Zionism is not a conspiracy... People have conspired in favor of zionism, but zionism has always been public knowledge and argued for in the open, which means zionism itself is not a conspiracy.

I'd say zionism is not just about the establishment of the state of Israel. It's about the establishment of a jewish kingdom that would rule over the world

I've never heard them say that.... And I don't think Gavrilo Princep or Leon Trotsky being a jew supports that claim.

Ok.... I got one question I think it's really important for you to answer as it will shed light on some philosophical differences we might have.

Is it accurate and fair to describe the mafia as "An Italian conspiracy to rule New York"? Why or why not?

Building a case for what? You have to actually define the charges before you can build a case.

I'm sure I did in my initial comment. You wanted me to provide evidence for that claim, remember?

Here was your claim though... "That jewish financial and zionist interests were behind much of what transpired throughout modern history (1600's onwards)"

But when asked for specifics to support your claim you brought up that Gavrilo Princep was a jew, Leon Trotsky was a jew, and mentioned zionism.

Do you see the problem there?

You presented three separate and distinct ideologies (Serbian Nationalism, Communism, and Zionism) as if they are connected parts of a greater whole.

And you're acting like it supports your claim of jews controlling history simply because some jews were adherents to each of those ideologies.

Nothing you have presented so far has supported the idea of there being a jewish conspiracy to lie and reshape 400+ years of history for their own ends.

Zionism IS the conspiracy

Zionism is not a conspiracy... People have conspired in favor of zionism, but zionism has always been public knowledge and argued for in the open.

I'd say zionism is not just about the establishment of the state of Israel. It's about the establishment of a jewish kingdom that would rule over the world

I've never heard them say that.... And I don't think Gavrilo Princep or Leon Trotsky being a jew supports that claim.

Ok.... I got one question I think it's really important for you to answer as it will shed light on some philosophical differences we might have.

Is it accurate and fair to describe the mafia as "An Italian conspiracy to rule New York"? Why or why not?

Building a case for what? You have to actually define the charges before you can build a case.

I'm sure I did in my initial comment. You wanted me to provide evidence for that claim, remember?

Here was your claim though... "That jewish financial and zionist interests were behind much of what transpired throughout modern history (1600's onwards)"

But when asked for specifics to support your claim you brought up that Gavrilo Princep was a jew, Leon Trotsky was a jew, and mentioned zionism.

Do you see the problem there?

You presented three separate and distinct ideologies (Serbian Nationalism, Communism, and Zionism) as if they are connected parts of a greater whole.

And you're acting like it supports your claim of jews controlling history simply because some jews were adherents to each of those ideologies.

Nothing you have presented so far has supported the idea of there being a jewish conspiracy to lie and reshape 400+ years of history for their own ends.

Zionism IS the conspiracy

Zionism is not a conspiracy... People have conspired in favor of zionism, but zionism has always been public knowledge and argued for in the open.

I'd say zionism is not just about the establishment of the state of Israel. It's about the establishment of a jewish kingdom that would rule over the world

I've never heard them say that.... And I don't think Gavrilo Princep or Leon Trotsky being a jew supports that claim.

Ok.... I got one question I think it's really important for you to answer as it will shed light on some philosophical differences we might have.

Is it accurate and fair to describe the mafia as "An Italian conspiracy to rule New York"? Why or why not?

Building a case for what? You have to actually define the charges before you can build a case.

I'm sure I did in my initial comment. You wanted me to provide evidence for that claim, remember?

Here was your claim though... "That jewish financial and zionist interests were behind much of what transpired throughout modern history (1600's onwards)"

But when asked for specifics to support your claim you brought up that Gavrilo Princep was a jew, Leon Trotsky was a jew, and mentioned zionism.

Do you see the problem there?

You presented three separate and distinct ideologies (Serbian Nationalism, Communism, and Zionism) as if they are connected parts of a greater whole.

And you're acting like it supports your claim of jews controlling history simply because some jews were adherents to each of those ideologies.

Nothing you have presented so far has supported the idea of there being a jewish conspiracy to lie and reshape 400+ years of history for their own ends.

Zionism IS the conspiracy

Zionism is not a conspiracy... People have conspired in favor of zionism, but zionism has always been public knowledge and argued for in the open.

I'd say zionism is not just about the establishment of the state of Israel. It's about the establishment of a jewish kingdom that would rule over the world

I've never heard them say that.... And I don't think Gavrilo Princep or Leon Trotsky being a jew supports that claim.

Ok.... I got one question I think it's really important for you to answer as it will shed light on some philosophical differences we might have.

Is it accurate and fair to describe the mafia as "An Italian conspiracy to rule New York"? Why or why not?

Building a case for what? You have to actually define the charges before you can build a case.

I'm sure I did in my initial comment. You wanted me to provide evidence for that claim, remember?

Here was your claim though... "That jewish financial and zionist interests were behind much of what transpired throughout modern history (1600's onwards)"

But when asked for specifics to support your claim you brought up that Gavrilo Princep was a jew, Leon Trotsky was a jew, and mentioned zionism.

Do you see the problem there?

You're presenting separate and distinct ideologies and agendas and presenting them as if they are connected parts of a greater whole. Serbian Nationalism, Communism, and Zionism....

And it supports your claim of jews controlling history simply because some jews were adherants to those ideologies.

Nothing you have presented so far has supported the idea of there being a jewish conspiracy to lie and reshape 400+ years of history for their own ends.

Zionism IS the conspiracy

Zionism is not a conspiracy... People have conspired in favor of zionism, but zionism has always been public knowledge and argued for in the open.

I'd say zionism is not just about the establishment of the state of Israel. It's about the establishment of a jewish kingdom that would rule over the world

I've never heard them say that.... And I don't think Gavrilo Princep being a jew supports that claim.

Ok.... I got one question I think it's really important for you to answer as it will shed light on some philosophical differences we might have.

Is it accurate and fair to describe the mafia as "An Italian conspiracy to rule New York"? Why or why not?