This sounds an awful lot like the commie cope "but we never had true communism because the bourgeois capitalists were always running things from within". That's why I asked you - if Christianity bad and what came after Christianity bad, then what is the good form of government and society structure?

The "but we never had true communism because the bourgeois capitalists were always running things from within" is exactly what I am opposing. If you look at modern Christianity, the ones that didn't fall for establishment agenda, all they call for is do not murder, do not rape, follow basic human decency and only kill in self-defense -- yes, whatever corrupt shit is going in on America now is worthy of a mass crusade. Those are the people Communists love to kill. On the other hand, you have literal Zionists and Talmudists who preach insanity like original sin or god has power over your children and you have to chop them in pieces if he asks you to (yes they teach this even in the present day) or delusional beliefs such as the Rapture (where the most pious Christians can evade genocide through Jesus by being pious). The elites still sorta do this, they just swapped the lie too many types that you fail to recognize that there is a pattern no matter what cover story they use.

The best case against Hitler you could make is that he was a patsy and the jews helped him get into power, i.e. they manipulated him and knew he would fail and give them perpetual victimhood status. But that's a weak case too considering the evidence. The jewish Hitler theory is outright demented and I'm not saying this as a Hitler fanboy since I don't support many of the things he did, though I can see things his way and the why behind much of it. He was facing the jewish commie NWO and thought the ends justified the means in this battle.

Mainstream historian narratives about Hitler don't make sense unless you see everything in the view of a gigantic false opposition psyop intending to kill as many people as possible and blame it all on a scapegoat.

This sounds an awful lot like the commie cope "but we never had true communism because the bourgeois capitalists were always running things from within". That's why I asked you - if Christianity bad and what came after Christianity bad, then what is the good form of government and society structure?

The "but we never had true communism because the bourgeois capitalists were always running things from within" is exactly what I am opposing. If you look at modern Christianity, the ones that didn't fall for establishment agenda, all they call for is do not murder, do not rape, follow basic human decency and only kill in self-defense -- yes, whatever corrupt shit is going in on America now is worthy of that "self defense" especially when genocide is around the corner. Those are the people Communists love to kill. On the other hand, you have literal Zionists and Talmudists who preach insanity like original sin or god has power over your children and you have to chop them in pieces if he asks you to (yes they teach this even in the present day) or delusional beliefs such as the Rapture (where the most pious Christians can evade genocide through Jesus by being pious). The elites still sorta do this, they just swapped the lie too many types that you fail to recognize that there is a pattern no matter what cover story they use.

The best case against Hitler you could make is that he was a patsy and the jews helped him get into power, i.e. they manipulated him and knew he would fail and give them perpetual victimhood status. But that's a weak case too considering the evidence. The jewish Hitler theory is outright demented and I'm not saying this as a Hitler fanboy since I don't support many of the things he did, though I can see things his way and the why behind much of it. He was facing the jewish commie NWO and thought the ends justified the means in this battle.

Mainstream historian narratives about Hitler don't make sense unless you see everything in the view of a gigantic false opposition psyop intending to kill as many people as possible and blame it all on a scapegoat.

This sounds an awful lot like the commie cope "but we never had true communism because the bourgeois capitalists were always running things from within". That's why I asked you - if Christianity bad and what came after Christianity bad, then what is the good form of government and society structure?

The "but we never had true communism because the bourgeois capitalists were always running things from within" is exactly what I am opposing. If you look at modern Christianity, the ones that didn't fall for establishment agenda, all they call for is do not murder, do not rape, follow basic human decency and only kill in self-defense. Yes, "self defense" includes whatever corrupt shit is going in on America now. Those are the people Communists love to kill. On the other hand, you have literal Zionists and Talmudists who preach insanity like original sin or god has power over your children and you have to chop them in pieces if he asks you to (yes they teach this even in the present day) or delusional beliefs such as the Rapture (where the most pious Christians can evade genocide through Jesus by being pious). The elites still sorta do this, they just swapped the lie too many types that you fail to recognize that there is a pattern no matter what cover story they use.

The best case against Hitler you could make is that he was a patsy and the jews helped him get into power, i.e. they manipulated him and knew he would fail and give them perpetual victimhood status. But that's a weak case too considering the evidence. The jewish Hitler theory is outright demented and I'm not saying this as a Hitler fanboy since I don't support many of the things he did, though I can see things his way and the why behind much of it. He was facing the jewish commie NWO and thought the ends justified the means in this battle.

Mainstream historian narratives about Hitler don't make sense unless you see everything in the view of a gigantic false opposition psyop intending to kill as many people as possible and blame it all on a scapegoat.

This sounds an awful lot like the commie cope "but we never had true communism because the bourgeois capitalists were always running things from within". That's why I asked you - if Christianity bad and what came after Christianity bad, then what is the good form of government and society structure?

The "but we never had true communism because the bourgeois capitalists were always running things from within" is exactly what I am opposing. If you look at modern Christianity, the ones that didn't fall for establishment agenda, all they call for is do not murder, do not rape, follow basic human decency and only kill in self-defense. Those are the people Communists love to kill. On the other hand, you have literal Zionists and Talmudists who preach insanity like original sin or god has power over your children and you have to chop them in pieces if he asks you to (yes they teach this even in the present day) or delusional beliefs such as the Rapture (where the most pious Christians can evade genocide through Jesus by being pious). The elites still sorta do this, they just swapped the lie too many types that you fail to recognize that there is a pattern no matter what cover story they use.

The best case against Hitler you could make is that he was a patsy and the jews helped him get into power, i.e. they manipulated him and knew he would fail and give them perpetual victimhood status. But that's a weak case too considering the evidence. The jewish Hitler theory is outright demented and I'm not saying this as a Hitler fanboy since I don't support many of the things he did, though I can see things his way and the why behind much of it. He was facing the jewish commie NWO and thought the ends justified the means in this battle.

Mainstream historian narratives about Hitler don't make sense unless you see everything in the view of a gigantic false opposition psyop intending to kill as many people as possible and blame it all on a scapegoat.