Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You seem to not be understanding my point... I'm not evaluating nor disputing your evidence.

The point I'm making is that reddit has a good reason to ban this post without evaluating the evidence as well.

For example... The "trust and safety" team at reddit would look at that post and conclude that it could make the people being named targets for attacks and harassment. They are mandated by their employer with taking down content that fits that criteria... It's stupid I know, and I'm not defending the practice. But they do it anyways.

Next, the legal team at reddit is gonna look at a post like this and realize all the people being named are able to call in vast legal resources to sue the shit out of them.

So that's why I say regardless of the names being named, or whether or not they actually rule the world, reddit is taking that post down either way.

But just on a side note about your evidence... nobody can digest such a massive text ball presented in jpeg format. Consider a format that's more easily readable for such large text dumps.

33 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You seem to not be understanding my point... I'm not evaluating nor disputing your evidence.

The point I'm making is that reddit has a good reason to ban this post without evaluating the evidence as well.

For example... The "trust and safety" team at reddit would look at that post and conclude that it could make the people being named targets for attacks and harassment. They are mandated by their employer with taking down content that fits that criteria... It's stupid I know, and I'm not defending the practice. But they do it anyways.

Next, the legal team at reddit is gonna look at a post like this and realize all the people being named are are able to call in vast legal resources to sue the shit out of them.

So that's why I say regardless of the names being named, or whether or not they actually rule the world, reddit is taking that post down either way.

But just on a side note about your evidence... nobody can digest such a massive text ball presented in jpeg format. Consider a format that's more easily readable for such large text dumps.

33 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You seem to not be understanding my point... I'm not evaluating nor disputing your evidence.

The point I'm making is that reddit has a good reason to ban this post without evaluating the evidence as well.

For example... The "trust and safety" team at reddit would look at that post and conclude that it could make the names in the comments targets for attacks or harassment. They are mandated with taking down content that fits that criteria... It's stupid I know, but they do it.

Next, the legal team at reddit is gonna look at a post like this and realize all the names being named are people who are able to call in vast legal resources to sue the shit out of them.

So that's why I say regardless of the names being named, reddit is taking that post down either way.

But just on a side note about your evidence... nobody can digest such a massive text ball presented in jpeg format. Consider a format that's more easily readable for such large text dumps.

33 days ago
1 score