Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.

This is when you have an organic society. European "history" past the Roman Empire is on a straight and slippery slope to controlled mass-demoliton by insidious forces (most people like to call them the "Jews" but Gentiles such as the Chinese and the Cambodians can join) and it gets spread to just about everywhere else after the 19th century.

Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.

This is when you have an organic society. European "history" past the Roman Empire is on a straight and slippery scope to controlled mass-demoliton by insidious forces (most people like to call them the "Jews" but Gentiles such as the Chinese and the Cambodians can join) and it gets spread to just about everywhere else after the 19th century.

Why would monarchs, who's reign was dependent on the people genocide and starve them to death willingly? Yes, there were famines due to crop failures and poor planning. Genocide could only happen due to rebellion or due to failing to defend your people from outside threats. In those times you needed a lot of manpower to grow food and to wage wars. Hierarchy in society was a given and people knew their place. Sure there were unfit, cruel or weak monarchs but they weren't tolerated by their competitors and by the people. As a whole, people loved their rulers and there was no need for them to be brainwashed to do so if the ruler was good and just.

This is when you have an organic society. European "history" past the Roman Empire is on a straight and slippery scope to decline and mass mind-control by insidious forces (most people like to call them the "Jews" but Gentiles such as the Chinese and the Cambodians can join) and it gets spread to just about everywhere else after the 19th century.