Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

"You'll own nothing" means they'll keep....

Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable. Whatever suggested one attempts to keep by consent implies owning nothing...this includes "meaning".

poor

Rich vs poor implies wanting vs not wanting the suggested values by another...while ignoring to be perception aka evaluation.

One cannot be poor in reality; since nature offers everything perceivable to each ones perception at any moment of being. Furthermore...poor (destitute of property) implies that perception cannot hold onto perceivable without ignoring that it moves, while rich (Latin rego; reach) implies everything perceivable in reach of each ones perception.

Consenting to suggested information implies taking in; while adapting to perceivable inspiration implies reaching out. Gentiles took in suggested values by a jew and are now holding onto "muh precious"; while ignoring to reach out...

singlehandedly created

The single hand of a jew suggesting creationism has no control over another until the moment a gentile consents to it.

If a jew suggests that everything perceivable has a price; the gentile consent sells everything perceivable out the jew suggesting the price.

199 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

"You'll own nothing" means they'll keep....

Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable. Whatever suggested one attempts to keep by consent implies owning nothing...this includes "meaning".

poor

Rich vs poor implies wanting vs not wanting the suggested values by another...while ignoring to be perception aka evaluation.

One cannot be poor in reality; since nature offers everything perceivable to each ones perception at any moment of being. Furthermore...poor (destitute of property) implies that perception cannot hold onto perceivable without ignoring that it moves, while rich (Latin rego; reach) implies everything perceivable in reach of each ones perception.

Consenting to suggested information implies taking in; while adapting to perceivable inspiration implies reaching out. Gentiles took in suggested values by a jew and are now holding onto "muh precious"; while ignoring to reach out...

199 days ago
1 score