Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

This is gaining attention fast on Reddit and other sites.

It has a strong stench of bullshit.

Smells like another fake, orchestrated or hijacked uprising of the people.

Summary of the video

We have a problem: Game companies are making games dependent on servers they provide and when those servers are shut down, the game you purchased is no longer playable.
This is the solution: Cry to nanny government for help and further expand their power in the process.

Why it's of interest

Video games are quickly becoming the primary form of entertainment.

Video game creation is decentralized (couple teens in a bedroom can literally make a hit game) so TPTB are having a bitch of a time capturing it the way they captured TV and film.

What's the conspiracy?

The actual likely goal of this 'campaign' is to set up the introductory stage of a system of legal penalties and hurdles for anyone who wants to make an online multiplayer game.

This helps ensure that independent game makers won't want to risk entering the online multiplayer game space, leaving it in the hands of the globalist mega corps.

Though it might not even be this specific. It might just simply be about normalizing the process of increasing government power over video games.

What's the actual solution to the problem?

Voting with your pocketbook. You simply refuse to buy from game makers with a history of making their game totally dependent on their servers, then shutting down said servers.

228 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

This is gaining attention fast on Reddit and other sites.

It has a strong stench of bullshit.

Smells like another fake, orchestrated or hijacked uprising of the people.

Summary of the video

We have a problem: Game companies are making games dependent on servers they provide and when those servers are shut down, the game you purchased is no longer playable.
This is the solution: Cry to nanny government for help and further expand their power in the process.

Why it's of interest

Video games are quickly becoming the primary form of entertainment.

Video game creation is decentralized (couple teens in a bedroom can literally make a hit game) so TPTB are having a bitch of a time capturing it the way they captured TV and film.

What's the conspiracy?

The actual likely goal of this 'campaign' is to set up the introductory stage of a system of legal penalties and hurdles for anyone who wants to make an online multiplayer game.

This helps ensure that independent game makers won't want to risk entering the online multiplayer game space, leaving it in the hands of the globalist mega corps.

Though it might not even be this specific. If might just simply be about normalizing the process of increasing government power over video games.

What's the actual solution to the problem?

Voting with your pocketbook. You simply refuse to buy from game makers with a history of making their game totally dependent on their servers, then shutting down said servers.

228 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

This is gaining attention fast on Reddit and other sites.

It has a strong stench of bullshit.

Smells like another fake, orchestrated or hijacked uprising of the people.

Summary of the video

We have a problem: Game companies are making games dependent on servers they provide and when those servers are shut down, the game you purchased is no longer playable.
This is the solution: Cry to nanny government for help and further expand their power in the process.

Why it's of interest

Video games are quickly becoming the primary form of entertainment.

Video game creation is decentralized (couple teens in a bedroom can literally make a hit game) so TPTB are having a bitch of a time capturing it the way they captured TV and film.

What's the conspiracy?

The actual likely goal of this 'campaign' is to set up the introductory stage of a system of legal penalties and hurdles for anyone who wants to make an online multiplayer game.

This helps ensure that independent game makers won't want to risk entering the online multiplayer game space, leaving it in the hands of the globalist mega corps.

Though it might not even be this specific. If might just simply be about normalizing the process of increasing government power over video games.

What's the actually solution to the problem?

Voting with your pocketbook. You simply refuse to buy from game makers with a history of making their game totally dependent on their servers, then shutting down said servers.

228 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

This is gaining attention fast on Reddit and other sites.

It has a strong stench of bullshit.

Smells like another fake, orchestrated or hijacked uprising of the people.

Summary of the video

We have a problem: Game companies are making games dependent on servers they provide and when those servers are shut down, the game you purchased is no longer playable.
This is the solution: Cry to nanny government for help and further expand their power in the process.

Why it's of interest

Video games are quickly becoming the primary form of entertainment.

Video game creation is decentralized (couple teens in a bedroom can literally make a hit game) so TPTB are having a bitch of a time capturing it the way they captured TV and film.

What's the conspiracy?

The actual likely goal of this 'campaign' is to set up the introductory phase of system of legal penalties and hurdles for anyone who wants to make an online multiplayer game.

This helps ensure that independent game makers won't want to risk entering the online multiplayer game space, leaving it in the hands of the globalist mega corps.

Though it might not even be this specific. If might just simply be about normalizing the process of increasing government power over video games.

What's the actually solution to the problem?

Voting with your pocketbook. You simply refuse to buy from game makers with a history of making their game totally dependent on their servers, then shutting down said servers.

228 days ago
1 score