1. If they could show her, they would have shown her already.

2. Something happened to her, that was unexpected, they had to come up with a hasty cover story, and it's backfiring, the liars are getting caught.

3. At this stage, when you can't show her (due to reason X), and you've already been caught lying, photoshopping, faking and evading, you just try to buy time. This is a classic PR move.

4. One such tactic is to "leak" materials, shot on potato cam, that looks like "maybe Kate" and you test the waters: can you show off somebody else as "Kate" from far away enough and pass that person off as "Kate". But you do this via paparazzi channels, with people being only semi-identifiable, and you let the public decide. You test what works. The latest video is clearly a test like this.

5. Currently, clearly they are just buying time, trying to postpone telling the truth on Reason X, whatever that is.

Also, as this is a Shiny Object of the Week (TM) for most UK sheeple, who are braindead about the "Royals", this serves a secondary useful function of being an easily deployable attention getter and a diversion.

Whatever happened to her and whatever happened Thomas Kingston, I doubt we'll ever know.

99% of UK media is fully under MI5 control and with draconian laws in place and harsh punishments to anyone who deviates from the script.

Whatever you read in the MSM media in UK about this, it is carefully planted, scripted and/or a minor leak "allowed" to happen.

Real journalism in UK died an agonizing death a long time ago.

Why do I care about this Kate-thing?

I) It serves as a teachable moment as to how these PR-Media-Narrative-Ops are done, how they work and how 90% fall for it.

II) It is a good basic test of trance-sleep : if a person falls for the official story and takes the Royal / MSM word for it, that person is 100% in trance and beyond any hope. Just ignore them. Yeah, this includes most of my close relatives. I love them, I wish good for them, but they are zombies. Their "thinking" is just pre-fed narratives.

That's why I care. It's a useful test. 90% fail.

1. If they could show her, they would have shown her already.

2. Something happened to her, that was unexpected, they had to come up with a hasty cover story, and it's backfiring, the liars are getting caught.

3. At this stage, when you can't show her (due to reason X), and you've already been caught lying, photoshopping, faking and evading, you just try to buy time. This is a classic PR move.

4. One such tactic is to "leak" materials, shot on potato cam, that looks like "maybe Kate" and you test the waters: can you show off somebody else as "Kate" from far away enough and pass that person off as "Kate". But you do this via paparazzi channels, with people being only semi-identifiable, and you let the public decide. You test what works. The latest video is clearly a test like this.

5. Currently, clearly they are just buying time, trying to postpone telling the truth on Reason X, whatever that is.

Also, as this is a Shiny Object of the Week (TM) for most UK sheeple, who are braindead about the "Royals", this serves a secondary useful function of being an easily deployable attention getter and a diversion.

Whatever happened to her and whatever happened Thomas Kingston, I doubt we'll ever know.

99% of UK media is fully under MI5 control and with draconian laws in place and harsh punishments to anyone who deviates from the script.

Whatever you read in the MSM media in UK about this, it is carefully planted, scripted and/or a minor leak "allowed" to happen.

Real journalism in UK died an agonizing death a long time ago.

Why do I care about this Kate-thnig?

I) It serves as a teachable moment as to how these things are done

II) It is a good basic test of trance-sleep : if they fall for the official story and take the Royal / MSM word for it, they are 100% in trance and beyond any hope.

That's why I care. It's a useful test. 90% fail.