I watched it just now and I don't see:

Non-tech environment - he makes the "experiment" in his own home.

No people tested.

No data in real time evaluated.

Just check out the documentary that I've posted. They have all the data tested in real time, in a proper environment, and with actual people.

Sorry, but if you consider this a real test, then you must really review the Bluetruth documentary first. Then tell me how the video you shared is better. The "tests" you say are at around 33rd min mark and the guy is only talking - no tests conducted.

EDIT: Sorry, just noticed. You send me a video of a guy with greenscreen, a microscope on the desk (never used), and his own word that he actually did something, while no evidence is presented.

I send you a documentary with live tests done with people in a proper environment from actual doctors that you can check on their website and else...

I don't really know who Richard Hall is. Is he a doctor tho? Tech specialist? Or just a guy with a greenscreen, microscope and a podcast?

Sorry, but I share actual tests that are shown, and you provide some guy with his theory - no actual test whatsoever shown... How is that the same?

I watched it just now and I don't see:

Non-tech environment - he makes the "experiment" in his own home.

No people tested.

No data in real time evaluated.

Just check out the documentary that I've posted. They have all the data tested in real time, in a proper environment, and with actual people.

Sorry, but if you consider this a real test, then you must really review the Bluetruth documentary first. Then tell me how the video you shared is better. The "tests" you say are at around 33rd min mark and the guy is only talking - no tests conducted.