"Man made" is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting in this reply.

Prove absolutely anything without any "man made" text of any kind. (E.g.; a diary is a man-made text, a record of events, and is worthy of consideration even though it is "man made." The Bible is a compilation of similar first-hand accounts) All of history is man made. Every scientific paper and discovery is man made. The language that we speak is man made. You've just eliminated any and every form of evidence with that frankly ridiculous limitation.

Your first response in this thread, to which I replied, alleged that Christianity was based on a "horrible disfiguration of the jewish bible." But it turns out that was not your problem with it at all, because that would have implied that you believe the "jewish bible" was legitimate and that Christianity was illegitimate based on incongruity with the "jewish bible." But that was not true at all, even though for some reason you never criticized the "jewish bible" for its God but instead reserved your anti-God ire for Christianity. That's why I needed clarification in order to address your issues.

But your argument as now presented is nothing more than incredulity and brick-wall refusal to honestly consider actual evidence.

I do not believe you are a serious person, and that makes this entire conversation an exercise in utter futility.

I'll be more than happy to debate and to share my actual, undeniable experiences and my thoughts & ideas with anybody who has even a modicum of honesty or curiosity, but I am disappointed with the hostility encountered here.

"Man made" is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting in this reply.

Prove absolutely anything without any "man made" text of any kind. (E.g.; a diary is a man-made text, a record of events, and is worthy of consideration even though it is "man made." The Bible is a compilation of similar first-hand accounts) All of history is man made. Every scientific paper and discovery is man made. The language that we speak is man made. You've just eliminated any and every form of evidence with that frankly ridiculous limitation.

Your first response in this thread, to which I replied, alleged that Christianity was based on a "horrible disfiguration of the jewish bible." But it turns out that was not your problem with it at all, because that would have implied that you believe the "jewish bible" was legitimate and that Christianity was illegitimate based on incongruity with the "jewish bible." But that was not true at all, even though for some reason you never criticized the "jewish bible" for its God but instead reserved your anti-God ire for Christianity. That's why I needed clarification in order to address your issues.

But your argument as now presented is nothing more than incredulity and brick-wall refusal to honestly consider actual evidence.

I do not believe you are a serious person, and that makes this entire conversation an exercise in utter futility.

I'll be more than happy to debate and to share my actual, undeniable experiences and ideas with anybody who has even a modicum of honesty or curiosity, but I am disappointed with the hostility encountered here.

"Man made" is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting in this reply.

Prove absolutely anything without any "man made" text of any kind. (E.g.; a diary is a man-made text, a record of events, and is worthy of consideration even though it is "man made." The Bible is a compilation of similar first-hand accounts)

Your first response in this thread, to which I replied, alleged that Christianity was based on a "horrible disfiguration of the jewish bible." But it turns out that was not your problem with it at all, because that would have implied that you believe the "jewish bible" was legitimate and that Christianity was illegitimate based on incongruity with the "jewish bible." But that was not true at all, even though for some reason you never criticized the "jewish bible" for its God but instead reserved your anti-God ire for Christianity. That's why I needed clarification in order to address your issues.

But your argument as now presented is nothing more than incredulity and brick-wall refusal to honestly consider actual evidence.

I do not believe you are a serious person, and that makes this entire conversation an exercise in utter futility.

I'll be more than happy to debate and to share my thoughts and ideas with anybody who has even a modicum of honesty or curiosity, but I am disappointed with the hostility encountered here.

"Man made" is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting in this reply.

Prove absolutely anything without any "man made" text of any kind. (E.g.; a diary is a man-made text, a record of events, and is worthy of consideration even though it is "man made." The Bible is a compilation of similar first-hand accounts)

Your first response in this thread, to which I replied, alleged that Christianity was based on a "horrible disfiguration of the jewish bible." But it turns out that was not your problem with it at all, because that would have implied that you believe the "jewish bible" was legitimate and that Christianity was illegitimate based on incongruity with the "jewish bible." But that was not true at all, even though for some reason you never criticized the "jewish bible" for its God but instead reserved your anti-God ire for Christianity. That's why I needed clarification in order to address your issues.

But your argument as now presented is nothing more than incredulity and brick-wall refusal to honestly consider actual evidence.

I do not believe you are a serious person, and that makes this entire conversation an exercise in utter futility.

"Man made" is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting in this reply.

Prove absolutely anything without any "man made" text of any kind. (E.g.; a diary is a man-made text, a record of events, and is worthy of consideration even though it is "man made." The Bible is a compilation of similar first-hand accounts)

I do not believe you are a serious person, and that makes this entire conversation an exercise in utter futility.

"Man made" is pulling an awful lot of weight in this reply.

Prove absolutely anything without any "man made" text of any kind.

I do not believe you are a serious person, and that makes this entire conversation an exercise in utter futility.