Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I dont believe they made it to the moon, but a couple notes here.

Ive mentioned before, when the soviets wanted to take a picture of the moon, they used spyfilm they had taken from crashed weather balloons.

https://fstoppers.com/film/how-soviet-union-snapped-first-picture-far-side-moon-captured-air-force-kodak-325971

And the problem wasnt sending a signal, it was sending one in real time, there was at least a 2.4 second delay in the signal yet the president had no problem talking to them in real time.

https://youtu.be/WTFZpZFeF18?t=119

Wheres the delay?

Watching it again, I see there is a cut for a second. I dont remember this in the original video. In fact the original one isnt in the top results. But I did find this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkJk76wh4-4

So this guy is proably right.

https://youtu.be/1Ai_HCBDQIQ

Original clip, there is a delay. Does seem rather long though. If it takes like 2.4-3 seconds to reach the moon and back. Wouldnt it only take like 1.5 seconds to get from the moon to the earth, another couple seconds to get from florida to washington. Just a delay in the equipment proably? Meh whatever. Im interested in the new moon mission, for sure. Thought it was interesting they strapped the dummys with radiation vests because of "boobies".

Not to mention, they built a 1:1 ratio full size set in the desert, where they recreated the craters exactly by using bombs. Boy I bet that took some effort. Prolly easier than going to the moon at that time.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/going-moon-apollo-11-astronauts-trained-these-five-sites-180972452/

But for the lander itself, it would work. No atmosphere, no weather. The vacumn itself is a very little threat. Its radiation that makes it inhospitable for organic things, and traditional electronics as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSZMNu4PWf8

If a can of sheet thin aluminum can do it, then for sure something thicker would as well. Of course, thats not going to do anything for a random cosmic or solar event though. Amazing no one ended up sterile or crazy from the trip.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I dont believe they made it to the moon, but a couple notes here.

Ive mentioned before, when the soviets wanted to take a picture of the moon, they used spyfilm they had taken from crashed weather balloons.

https://fstoppers.com/film/how-soviet-union-snapped-first-picture-far-side-moon-captured-air-force-kodak-325971

And the problem wasnt sending a signal, it was sending one in real time, there was at least a 2.4 second delay in the signal yet the president had no problem talking to them in real time.

https://youtu.be/WTFZpZFeF18?t=119

Wheres the delay?

Watching it again, I see there is a cut for a second. I dont remember this in the original video. In fact the original one isnt in the top results. But I did find this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkJk76wh4-4

So this guy is proably right.

Not to mention, they built a 1:1 ratio full size set in the desert, where they recreated the craters exactly by using bombs. Boy I bet that took some effort. Prolly easier than going to the moon at that time.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/going-moon-apollo-11-astronauts-trained-these-five-sites-180972452/

But for the lander itself, it would work. No atmosphere, no weather. The vacumn itself is a very little threat. Its radiation that makes it inhospitable for organic things, and traditional electronics as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSZMNu4PWf8

If a can of sheet thin aluminum can do it, then for sure something thicker would as well. Of course, thats not going to do anything for a random cosmic or solar event though. Amazing no one ended up sterile or crazy from the trip.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I dont believe they made it to the moon, but a couple notes here.

Ive mentioned before, when the soviets wanted to take a picture of the moon, they used spyfilm they had taken from crashed weather balloons.

https://fstoppers.com/film/how-soviet-union-snapped-first-picture-far-side-moon-captured-air-force-kodak-325971

And the problem wasnt sending a signal, it was sending one in real time, there was at least a 2.4 second delay in the signal yet the president had no problem talking to them in real time.

https://youtu.be/WTFZpZFeF18?t=119

Wheres the delay?

Not to mention, they built a 1:1 ratio full size set in the desert, where they recreated the craters exactly by using bombs. Boy I bet that took some effort. Prolly easier than going to the moon at that time.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/going-moon-apollo-11-astronauts-trained-these-five-sites-180972452/

But for the lander itself, it would work. No atmosphere, no weather. The vacumn itself is a very little threat. Its radiation that makes it inhospitable for organic things, and traditional electronics as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSZMNu4PWf8

If a can of sheet thin aluminum can do it, then for sure something thicker would as well. Of course, thats not going to do anything for a random cosmic or solar event though. Amazing no one ended up sterile or crazy from the trip.

1 year ago
1 score