Sounds like a first amendment auditor lol.
We don't have first amendment, but I think that grift will work even where any kind of first amendment law exist. It's not hard to think out something that formally will fall under free speech but will be unacceptable for authorities so they will find a way to prosecute perpetuator for something else. IDK, fine for protesting near fireplug, accuse of sedition or whatever. Then do that crowdfunding thing as a victim of totalitarians.
Here we have kind of very perverted type of freedom of speech. Government fully monopolize prosecution for unwanted speech. Formally, you could say anything you want, and in worst case you will be fined, or get suspended sentence and walk out of court free. (excluding cases with disclosing state secrets, sedition, etc. that fall under other laws) And at the same time state protect those who break the law in such way and heavily prosecute anybody who could violently react to some expression of free speech. Kind of weird, really.
I think freedom of speech should be unlimited, but any consequences should be on the speaker. If you wish to publicly declare, say that "all other people are dumbfucks and bastards" - it's completely up to you, you should be free of any charges, but those who could punch your face after your performance should not be prosecuted for that too. Direct responsibility for your words and all that stuff. Politicians, journalists and bureaucrats public speeches and performances included, of course. At least it will be different and fun. :)
Sounds like a first amendment auditor lol.
We don't have first amendment, but I think that grift will work even where any kind of first amendment law exist. It's not hard to think out something that formally will fall under free speech but will be unacceptable for authorities so they will find a way to prosecute perpetuator for something else. IDK, fine for protesting near fireplug, accuse of sedition or whatever. Then do that crowdfunding thing as a victim of totalitarians.
Here we have kind of very perverted type of freedom of speech. Government fully monopolize prosecution for unwanted speech. Formally, you could say anything you want, and in worst case you will be fined, or get suspended sentence and walk out of court free. (excluding cases with disclosing state secrets, sedition, etc. that fall under other laws) And at the same time state protect those who break the law in such way and heavily prosecute anybody who could violently react to some expression of free speech. Kind of weird, really.
I think freedom of speech should be unlimited, but any consequences should be on the speaker. If you wish to publicly declare, say that "all other people are dumbfucks and bastards" - it's completely up to you, you should be free of any charges, but those who could punch your face after your performance should not be prosecuted for that. Direct responsibility for your words and all that stuff. Politicians, journalists and bureaucrats public speeches and performances included, of course. At least it will be different and fun. :)
Sounds like a first amendment auditor lol.
We don't have first amendment, but I think that grift will work even where any kind of first amendment law exist. It's not hard to think out something that formally will fall under free speech but will be unacceptable for authorities so they will find a way to prosecute perpetuator for something else. IDK, fine for protesting near fireplug, accuse of sedition or whatever. Then do that crowdfunding thing as a victim of totalitarians.
Here we have kind of very perverted type of freedom of speech. Government fully monopolize prosecution for unwanted speech. Formally, you could say anything you want, and in worst case you will be fined, or get suspended sentence and walk out of court free. (excluding cases with disclosing state secrets, sedition, etc. that fall under other laws) And at the same time state protect those who break the law in such way and heavily prosecute anybody who could violently react to some expression of free speech. Kind of weird, really.
I think freedom of speech should be unlimited, but any consequences should be on the speaker. If wish to publicly declare, say that "all other people are dumbfucks and bastards" - it's completely up to you, you should be free of any charges, but those who could punch your face after your performance should not be prosecuted for that. Direct responsibility for your words and all that stuff. Politicians, journalists and bureaucrats public speeches and performances included, of course. At least it will be different and fun. :)