Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

quantum computing (which already exists and 1000 qubits is nearing implemenatation)

Quantum computing is useless. More qbits you have, larger error you get. With few dozen qbits error is already make result senseless. There is still no any proof that any quantum computer ever did any useful calculation at all. The best result quantum computing have for a long time is finding that number 21 consists from prime numbers 7 and 3. And it is really staged result obtained from quantum computer built for exact purpose of factorization of number 21.

Quantum computing is a joke. It is one of systems that does not scale. And there are no any signs of some breakthrough that could solve that problem. And as far as I understand, such scientific breakthrough will have huge influence on whole physics, not just on stupid QCs, it would be as huge, as inventing antigravity or FTL. Just one of side effects of such breakthrough will be possibility to utilize zero-point energy. Comparing only to that thing, all quantum computing is just a stupid and irrelevant joke.That is why probability that such breakthrough will be allowed is close to zero.

It is funny, how elites put themselves to the corner with their obsession about access to private encrypted info. To get that. they have to allow things that will destroy them. :)

Those that aren't, aren't allowed to exist (companies, products and algos take off the market)

There is a huge part of software that invulnerable to such threats since it exists outside the market.

As for crypto - all existing crypto is just a beta version. It is only beginning of alternative currencies and means of exchange development. Trying to apply expectations from final product to the beta version and proof-of-concept things is idiocy.

You partially right about next crypto version necessities, but cryptography is not the top problem, really. Most problems barely connected with crypto at all, like reliable and independent connectivity or node consensus resolution algorithms. Funny fact - power consumption of PoW cryptos is not a problem, really. Power in any case spent for heating. PoW crypto mining rig is just a sophisticated heater, that in addition to converting electricity into heat like regular heater, also mine some coins. Here people who are in crypto mostly for fun and independence, not for making profit, just use mining rigs as heaters for houses. I have small XMR rig as heater for a shed. In any case I have to spent some electricity to keep temperature above 0°C, so why not mine a little coins at the same time to, f.e., pay for abroad hostings and domain names?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

quantum computing (which already exists and 1000 qubits is nearing implemenatation)

Quantum computing is useless. More qbits you have, larger error you get. With few dozen qbits error is already make result senseless. There is still no any proof that any quantum computer ever did any useful calculation at all. The best result quantum computing have for a long time is finding that number 21 consists from prime numbers 7 and 3. And it is really staged result obtained from quantum computer built for exact purpose of factorization of number 21.

Quantum computing is a joke. It is one of systems that does not scale. And there are no any signs of some breakthrough that could solve that problem. And as far as I understand, such scientific breakthrough will have huge influence on whole physics, not just on stupid QCs, it would be as huge, as inventing antigravity or FTL. Just one of side effects of such breakthrough will be possibility to utilize zero-point energy. Comparing only to that thing, all quantum computing is just a stupid and irrelevant joke.That is why probability that such breakthrough will be allowed is close to zero.

It is funny, how elites put themselves to the corner with their obsession about access to private encrypted info. To get that. they have to allow things that will destroy them. :)

Those that aren't, aren't allowed to exist (companies, products and algos take off the market)

There is a huge part of software that invulnerable to such threats since it exists outside the market.

As for crypto - all existing crypto is just a beta version. It is only beginning of alternative currencies and means of exchange development. Trying to apply expectations from final product to the beta version and proof-of-concept things is idiocy.

You partially right about next crypto version necessities, but cryptography is not the top problem, really. Most problems barely connected with crypto at all, like reliable and independent connectivity or node consensus resolution algorithms.

1 year ago
1 score