We have been domesticated

a) teach an animal to respond to words and it's called "domestication"...do it to humans and it's called "civilization".

b) being "free" will of choice implies within "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom.

Consenting to the suggestions by others implies submission of "free", while permitting another to "dom".

c) suggested pluralism (we) herds each consenting singular (one) under those suggesting it.

Im primarily talking about white

White (pure light) and Black (absence of light) imply secondary to prime "light" aka the spectrum within light.

Others suggest the labels "white and black" to tempt one to talk out of ones ass, while ignoring that one can neither perceive pure light; nor the absence of light, while existing within the visible spectrum of light.

think of them as culling events rather than wars

a) does being moved from inception towards death imply a culling event for the life within?

b) can a reasoning mind not be within a state of war/conflict?

there is no resistance because

Being within cause implies being resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death). Consenting to suggestions by others; tempts one to ignore resisting for the sustenance of self.

domesticated to accept

Acceptance implies by ones free will of choice...slave (consent) sets master (suggestion).

to accept our deaths.

As long as one breathes; drinks; eats and shelters; so long does one resist dying. Others tempt one with suggestions to ignore growing resistance by resisting (need) temptations (want).

led to their slaughter

If life is being moved from inception towards death; then does that imply being led to the slaughter?

look at the shit

Consenting to such a suggestion tempts one to view perceivable reality through the lens of suggested "shit". Try resisting the temptation to view "through the looking glass".

they...we...

Where's one-self situated? Is singular (one) part of this (they) or that (we) plural?

Where is a "chosen one" situated? Would a chosen one choose to be part of a group filled with those choosing to follow?

We have been domesticated

a) teach an animal to respond to words and it's called "domestication"...do it to humans and it's called "civilization".

b) being "free" will of choice implies within "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom.

Consenting to the suggestions by others implies submission of "free", while permitting another to "dom".

c) suggested pluralism (we) herds each consenting singular (one) under those suggesting it.

Im primarily talking about white

White (pure light) and Black (absence of light) imply secondary to prime "light" aka the spectrum within light.

Others suggest the labels "white and black" to tempt one to talk out of ones ass, while ignoring that one can neither perceive pure light; nor the absence of light, while existing within the visible spectrum of light.

think of them as culling events rather than wars

a) does being moved from inception towards death imply a culling event for the life within?

b) can a reasoning mind not be within a state of war/conflict?

there is no resistance because

Being within cause implies being resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death). Consenting to suggestions by others; tempts one to ignore resisting for the sustenance of self.

domesticated to accept

Acceptance implies by ones free will of choice...slave (consent) sets master (suggestion).

to accept our deaths.

As long as one breathes; drinks; eats and shelters; so long does one resist dying. Others tempt one with suggestions to ignore growing resistance by resisting (need) temptations (want).

led to their slaughter

If life is being moved from inception towards death; then does that imply being led to the slaughter?

look at the shit

Consenting to such a suggestion tempts one to view perceivable reality through the lens of suggested "shit". Try resisting the temptation to view "through the looking glass".

they...we...

Where's one-self situated? Is singular (one) part of this (they) or that (we) plural?

Where is a "chosen one" situated? Would a chosen one choose to be part of group filled with those choosing to follow?

We have been domesticated

a) teach an animal to respond to words and it's called "domestication"...do it to humans and it's called "civilization".

b) being "free" will of choice implies within "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom.

Consenting to the suggestions by others implies submission of "free", while permitting another to "dom".

c) suggested pluralism (we) herds each consenting singular (one) under those suggesting it.

Im primarily talking about white

White (pure light) and Black (absence of light) imply secondary to prime "light" aka the spectrum within light.

Others suggest the labels "white and black" to tempt one to talk out of ones ass, while ignoring that one can neither perceive pure light; nor the absence of light, while existing within the visible spectrum of light.

think of them as culling events rather than wars

a) does being moved from inception towards death imply a culling event for the life within?

b) can a reasoning mind not be within a state of war/conflict?

there is no resistance because

Being within cause implies being resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death). Consenting to suggestions by others; tempts one to ignore resisting for the sustenance of self.

domesticated to accept

Acceptance implies by ones free will of choice...slave (consent) sets master (suggestion).

to accept our deaths.

As long as one breathes; drinks; eats and shelters; so long does one resist dying. Others tempt one with suggestions to ignore growing resistance by resisting (need) temptations (want).

led to their slaughter

If life is being moved from inception towards death; then does that imply being led to the slaughter?

look at the shit

Consenting to such a suggestion tempts one to view perceivable reality through the lens of suggested "shit". Try resisting the temptation to view "through the looking glass".

they...we...

Where's one-self situated? Is singular (one) part of this (they) or that (we) plural?

Where is a "chosen one" situated? Would a chosen one choose to be part of group filled with those choosing to follow?