Emmm.. so a domicile is not the "dominating" entity and is allowed to be stolen. So, let's say inbred Khazars decide to steal Ohio, is it alright? it's not Washington DC so it's just a domicile isn't?
So what do you think of the Levant (Which includes Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Palestine and parts of Iraq). Is it allowed to be stolen by inbred Khazars?
And is Sudan a domicile? Or do you give it the right to exist and not be stolen by inbred Khazars?
Oh shit, I forgot. Didn't the Jews only supposedly stay in Palestine for what? 80 years? Where they had two separate domiciles fighting each other, both being dominated by others? And they never had anything to do with the south of Palestine? All according to your fake Torah history which you take for granted of course, not to mention so called modern Jews have nothing to do with so called historical Jews. Ask a keifeng Jew or a Falasha and he knows he has nothing to do with Palestine.
Didn't the Yabosean canaanites Arabs create states long before the Jews so called first state thousands of supposed years ago?
Emmm.. so a domicile is not the "dominating" entity and is allowed to be stolen. So, let's say inbred Khazars decide to steal Ohio, is it alright? it's not Washington DC so it's just a domicile isn't?
So what do you think of the Levant (Which includes Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Palestine and parts of Iraq). Is it allowed to be stolen by inbred Khazars?
And is Sudan a domicile? Or do you give it the right to exist and not be stolen by inbred Khazars?
Oh shit, I forgot. Didn't the Jews only supposedly stay in Palestine for what? 80 years? Where they had two separate domiciles fighting each other, both being dominated by others? And they never had anything to do with the south of Palestine? All according to your fake history which you take for granted of course, not to mention so called modern Jews have nothing to do with so called historical Jews. Ask a keifeng Jew or a Falasha and he knows he has nothing to do with Palestine.
Didn't the Yabosean canaanites Arabs create states long before the Jews so called first state thousands of supposed years ago?
Emmm.. so a domicile is not the "dominating" entity and is allowed to be stolen. So, let's say inbred Khazars decide to steal Ohio, is it alright? it's not Washington DC so it's just a domicile isn't?
So what do you think of the Levant (Which includes Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Palestine and parts of Iraq). Is it allowed to be stolen by inbred Khazars?
And is Sudan a domicile? Or do you give it the right to exist and not be stolen by inbred Khazars?
Oh shit, I forgot. Didn't the Jews only supposedly stay in Palestine for what? 80 years? Where they had two separate domiciles fighting each other, both being dominated by others? And they never had anything to do with the south of Palestine? All according to your fake history which you take for granted of course, not to mention so called modern Jews have nothing to do with so called historical Jews. Ask a keifeng Jew or a Falasha and he knows he has nothing to do with Palestine.
Didn't the Yabosean canaanites Arabs create states long before the Jews so called first state thousands of supposed years ago.