Isn't the court tied into various other non Israeli organisations. Like international law, and the UN. It then potentially neuters government on increasing security issues.

There are pros and cons.

But let's suggest if Israel had to pre-empt?

Let's suggest it got credible Intel Iran had completed its bomb. Could the court prevent, first strike, because it's against international law?

Iran isn't a member. It can pre-empt.

I am not sure of it completely without looking it all up, but it isn't as simple as the government amassing unquestionable power. There are more reasons. Many are on security. I'd guess. Others perhaps have been on the gridlock of hung governments. Expansion. Etc

I reckon, it's largely that any court has leaned far more towards international policy. Who knows? Tell me

Isn't the court tied into various other non Israeli organisations. Like international law, and the UN. It then potentially neuters government on increasing security issues.

There are pros and cons.

But let's suggest if Israel had to pre-empt?

Let's suggest it got credible Intel Iran had completed its bomb. Could the court prevent, first strike, because it's against international law?

Iran isn't a member. It can pre-empt.

I am not sure of it completely without looking it all up, but it isn't as simple as the government amassing unquestionable power. There are more reasons. Many are on security. I'd guess. Others perhaps have been on the gridlock of hung governments. Expansion. Etc

I reckon, its largely that any court has leaned far more towards international policy. Who knows? Tell me

Isn't the court tied into various other non Israeli organisations. Like international law, and the UN. It then potentially neuters government on increasing security issues.

There are pros and cons.

But let's suggest if Israel had to pre-empt?