Not from Planes. Angles. Planes fly over and are observable. What orbital platform? It would be visible. It would be huge. The multiple hits needed, the power source. You're talking charge times. Multiple lasers. It needs cooling. The laser gets damaged the more it fires. The laser blooms, and there's refraction, the beam to impact gets weaker over distances. It is carrying energy not light. Plus it's in upper orbit. There are angles, speed of the fly over, keeping it in orbit. Or it's full of fuel thrusters mechanics keeping it in position to fire multiple times. Where is the constant resupply and maintenance. Lifetime of a satellite what is it? A decade to 15 years? Orbital platform. Now it needs constant resupplying.

Where is the hole. Particularly from a laser. It heats an object piercing it. Leaving on metal a burned hole, where it heats the object. Every laser does this. Rocks trees metal. The impact mark. A fire inspector knows this. Where the fire accelerated from the source of the heat. It ignited from there it was hottest. Lasers leave a heat spot, where it get hotter and hotter, causing a hole or burn. Look at lasers downing missiles, and shells. They have a hole through them. Drones tend to burst into flames leaving a sorch mark. Where the laser slices through making an impact hole.

Why isn't Russia using the same tech in Ukraine?

As a fire inspector are there any compounds, chemicals that can acceralerate the fire on houses and vehicles. White ash is common in complete fire degradation. No carbon left just ash extreme heat. It's completely burnt.

Instead what we have is guesswork, and it's those aliens again.

He suggested microwave weapon as opposed to laser. Atmosphere where lasers struggle. They struggle in weather. Clouds dust. Enough to cause the beam to reflect. Microwave is even worse the further away. It becomes less believable. Guesswork outside of an anomaly. But we've seen the same thing in California. Not quite to the same extent of those cars.

Not from Planes. Angles. Planes fly over and are observable. What orbital platform? It would be visible. It would be huge. The multiple hits needed, the power source. You're talking charge times. Multiple lasers. It needs cooling. The laser gets damaged the more it fires. The laser blooms, and there's refraction, the beam to impact gets weaker over distances. It is carrying energy not light. Plus it's in upper orbit. There are angles, speed of the fly over, keeping it in orbit. Or it's full of fuel thrusters mechanics keeping it in position to fire multiple times. Where is the constant resupply and maintenance.

Where is the hole. Particularly from a laser. It heats an object piercing it. Leaving on metal a burned hole, where it heats the object. Every laser does this. Rocks trees metal. The impact mark. A fire inspector knows this. Where the fire accelerated from the source of the heat. It ignited from there it was hottest. Lasers leave a heat spot, where it get hotter and hotter, causing a hole or burn. Look at lasers downing missiles, and shells. They have a hole through them. Drones tend to burst into flames leaving a sorch mark. Where the laser slices through making an impact hole.

Why isn't Russia using the same tech in Ukraine?

As a fire inspector are there any compounds, chemicals that can acceralerate the fire on houses and vehicles. White ash is common in complete fire degradation. No carbon left just ash extreme heat. It's completely burnt.

Instead what we have is guesswork, and it's those aliens again.

He suggested microwave weapon as opposed to laser. Atmosphere where lasers struggle. They struggle in weather. Clouds dust. Enough to cause the beam to reflect. Microwave is even worse the further away. It becomes less believable. Guesswork outside of an anomaly. But we've seen the same thing in California. Not quite to the same extent of those cars.

Not from Planes. Angles. Planes fly over and are observable. What orbital platform? It would be visible. It would be huge. The multiple hits needed, the power source. You're talking charge times. Multiple lasers. It needs cooling. The laser gets damaged the more it fires. The laser blooms, and there's refraction, the beam to impact gets weaker over distances. It is carrying energy not light. Plus it's in upper orbit. There are angles, speed of the fly over, keeping it in orbit. Or it's full of fuel thrusters mechanics keeping it in position to fire multiple times. Where is the constant resupply and maintenance.

Where is the hole. Particularly from a laser. It heats an object piercing it. Leaving on metal a burned hole, where it heats the object. Every laser does this. Rocks trees metal. The impact mark. A fire inspector knows this. Where the fire accelerated from the source of the heat. It ignited from there it was hottest. Lasers leave a heat spot, where it get hotter and hotter, causing a hole or burn. Look at lasers downing missiles, and shells. They have a hole through them. Drones tend to burst into flames leaving a sorch mark. Where the laser slices through making an impact hole.

Why isn't Russia using the same tech in Ukraine?

As a fire inspector are there any compounds, chemicals that can acceralerate the fire on houses and vehicles. White ash is common in complete fire degradation. No carbon left just ash extreme heat. It's completely burnt.

Instead what we have is guesswork, and it's those aliens again.