I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here.' That too, can be divided as exoteric and esoteric.
Their knowledge is mostly exoteric, with the addition of badly understood magick and bad science with an agenda. Especially now in the age of science/technology.
Attempts to touch on the Divine Within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by. These are also secrets, but lesser ones.
If they have all the answers, then seek them out. It's all been done in that regard.
The alchemists, philosophers and theosophists lay it out.............have you read their body of work? Can you critique it, or is it taboo or too difficult as it is for 'everyone else'?
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
You seek exoteric knowledge of who/what/where/when in history.
Esoteric is guarded by Anubis in Egypt, and flaming cherubim in Judaic/Christian.
The jackal imitator of the Lion scholar.....guarding the 'secrets of the ark/arc'. Not literally of course. That would be exoteric and one would never be 'allowed' to enter.
I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here.' That too, can be divided as exoteric and esoteric.
Their knowledge is mostly exoteric, with the addition of badly understood magick and bad science with an agenda. Especially now in the age of science/technology.
Attempts to touch on the Divine Within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by. These are also secrets, but lesser ones.
If they have all the answers, then seek them out. It's all been done in that regard.
The alchemists, philosophers and theosophists lay it out.............have you read their body of work? Can you critique it, or is it taboo or too difficult as it is for 'everyone else'?
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
You seek exoteric knowledge of who/what/where/when in history.
Esoteric is guarded by Anubis......the jackal imitator of the lion.....guarding the 'secrets of the ark/arc'. Not literally of course. That would be exoteric and one would never enter believing that.
I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here. Their knowledge is mostly exoteric also. Especially now in the age of science/technology. Attempts to touch on the Divine within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by. These are also secrets, but lesser ones.
If they have all the answers, then seek them out. It's all been done in that regard.
The alchemists, philosophers and theosophists lay it out.............have you read their body of work? Can you critique it, or is it taboo or too difficult as it is for 'everyone else'?
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here. Their knowledge is mostly exoteric also. Especially now in the age of science/technology. Attempts to touch on the Divine within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by.
If they have all the answers, then seek them out. It's all been done in that regard.
The alchemists, philosophers and theosophists lay it out.............have you read their body of work? Can you critique it, or is it taboo or too difficult as it is for 'everyone else'?
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here. Their knowledge is mostly exoteric also. Especially now in the age of science/technology. Attempts to touch on the Divine within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by.
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
Speak for yourself