Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

What water in a drought? What planes if there are that many fires?

So for example 100 men, 20 fire engines, 2 helios took 2 weeks to extinguish a wildfire. It burnt 25 miles square.

Understand it yet?

Nothing. Planes can fly limited sorties, fill drop, return. Every fire engine and fire fighter and volunteer is already dispatched. They're being sent who knows how that all works. But despite efforts most of the time wildfires have to burn themselves out.

The problem is and continues to be no military/national guard response. It should be employed to assist. In fact an entire battalion should be given direct training. It should craft additional aircraft, vehicles. At this point it is beyond oxymoronic. There needs to be a disaster force with dedicated response training. Especially in repeated scenarios. No excuses.

The problem is deployment in Nation's as big as Canada, USA, etc. But come on. It cannot be that difficult to deploy and recon the meteorology, geography, conditions working alongside existing prevention.

I mean they're selling occurrence. Instead of organising additional personnel. They're still braindead. No no our forces need approval before providing dispatches.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

What water in a drought? What planes if there are that many fires?

So for example 100 men, 20 fire engines, 2 helios took 2 weeks to extinguish a wildfire. It burnt 25 miles square.

Understand it yet?

Nothing. Planes can fly limited sorties, fill drop, return. Every fire engine and fire fighter and volunteer is already dispatched. They're being sent who knows how that all works. But despite efforts most of the time wildfires have to burn themselves out.

The problem is and continues to be no military/national guard response. It should be employed to assist. In fact an entire battalion should be given direct training. It should craft additional aircraft, vehicles. At this point it is beyond oxymoronic. There needs to be a disaster force with dedicated response training. Especially in repeated scenarios. No excuses.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

What water in a drought? What planes if there are that many fires?

So for example 100 men, 20 fire engines, 2 helios took 2 weeks to extinguish a wildfire. It burnt 25 miles square.

Understand it yet?

Nothing. Planes can fly limited sorties, fill drop, return. Every fire engine and fire fighter and volunteer is already dispatched. They're being sent who knows how that all works. But despite efforts most of the time wildfires have to burn themselves out.

The problem is and continues to be no military/national guard response. It should be employed to assist. In fact an entire battalion should be given direct training. It should craft additional aircraft. At this point it is beyond oxymoronic. There needs to be a disaster force with dedicated response training. Especially in repeated scenarios. No excuses.

1 year ago
1 score