He states the bible as truth, in spite of contradictions, translations, and the fact that every word in it was written by man. He also claims that we have no free will, and that we are corrupt from birth. Jesus is in fact not even a name, but a title. I will not accept his words and interpretations as those of God, as it paradoxically embraces that which he is arguing against. He is crafting the image of God from his perspective.

Then he props up a straw man of having sex with animals? What? Why? Then goes on to state many facts by name only, and calling out them, or they.

Name changes? God, Jehovah, Jesus?

There are no points of reference of anything he is saying, He's just moving from point to point without contextual reference.

In fact I can sum up every sentence he says as the following:

The bible clearly states, whatever I want to say next, while quoting nothing

Not a single passage or book number mentioned or named. Oh wait. I need to be looking at the images that he is misquoting, and adding his own context to.

10:54; starwars.wikia.com.

That's irrelevant. Why is he using fiction as a talking point? This is like getting bludgeoned to death with a fresh salmon!

Remember, all lies contain an element of truth.

He said that. Suppository without being facetious.

Do not believe everything you here from the pulpit, just because it is branded Christian.

He said that too! Is this intentional? Is this deception real?

He states the bible as truth, in spite of contradictions, translations, and the fact that every word in it was written by man. He also claims that we have no free will, and that we are corrupt from birth. Jesus is in fact not even a name, but a title. I will not accept his words and interpretations as those of God, as it paradoxically embraces that which he is arguing against. He is crafting the image of God from his perspective.

Then he props up a straw man of having sex with animals? What? Why? Then goes on to state many facts by name only, and calling out them, or they.

Name changes? God, Jehovah, Jesus?

There are no points of reference of anything he is saying, He's just moving from point to point without contextual reference.

In fact I can sum up every sentence he says as the following:

The bible clearly states, whatever I want to say next, while quoting nothing

Not a single passage or book number mentioned or named. Oh wait. I need to be looking at the images that he is misquoting, and adding his own context to.

10:54; starwars.wikia.com.

That's irrelevant. Why is he using fiction as a talking point? This is like getting bludgeoned to death with a fresh salmon!

Remember, all lies contain an element of truth.

He said that. Suppository without being fascias.

Do not believe everything you here from the pulpit, just because it is branded Christian.

He said that too! Is this intentional? Is this deception real?

He states the bible as truth, in spite of contradictions, translations, and the fact that every word in it was written by man. He also claims that we have no free will, and that we are corrupt from birth. Jesus is in fact not even a name, but a title. I will not accept his words and interpretations as those of God, as it paradoxically embraces that which he is arguing against. He is crafting the image of God from his perspective.

Then he props up a straw man of having sex with animals? What? Why? Then goes on to state many facts by name only, and calling out them, or they.

Name changes? God, Jehovah, Jesus?

There are no points of reference of anything he is saying, He's just moving from point to point without contextual reference.

In fact I can sum up every sentence he says as the following:

The bible clearly states, whatever I want to say next, while quoting nothing

Not a single passage or book number mentioned or named. Oh wait. I need to be looking at the images that he is misquoting, and adding his own context to.

10:54; starwars.wikia.com.

That's irrelevant. Why is he using fiction as a talking point? This is like getting bludgeoned to death with a fresh salmon!

Word salad.

Remember, all lies contain an element of truth.

He said that. Suppository without being fascias.

He states the bible as truth, in spite of contradictions, translations, and the fact that every word in it was written by man. He also claims that we have no free will, and that we are corrupt from birth. Jesus is in fact not even a name, but a title. I will not accept his words and interpretations as those of God, as it paradoxically embraces that which he is arguing against. He is crafting the image of God from his perspective.

Then he props up a straw man of having sex with animals? What? Why? Then goes on to state many facts by name only, and calling out them, or they.

Name changes? God, Jehovah, Jesus?

There are no points of reference of anything he is saying, He's just moving from point to point without contextual reference.

In fact I can sum up every sentence he says as the following:

The bible clearly states, whatever I want to say next, while quoting nothing

Not a single passage or book number mentioned or named.

Word salad.

Remember, all lies contain an element of truth.

He said that. Suppository without being fascias.

10:54; starwars.wikia.com.

That's irrelevant. Why is he using fiction as a talking point? This is like getting bludgeoned to death with a fresh salmon!

He states the bible as truth, in spite of contradictions, translations, and the fact that every word in it was written by man. He also claims that we have no free will, and that we are corrupt from birth. Jesus is in fact not even a name, but a title. I will not accept his words and interpretations as those of God, as it paradoxically embraces that which he is arguing against. He is crafting the image of God from his perspective.

Then he props up a straw man of having sex with animals? What? Why? Then goes on to state many facts by name only, and calling out them, or they.

Name changes? God, Jehovah, Jesus?

There are no points of reference of anything he is saying, He's just moving from point to point without contextual reference.

In fact I can sum up every sentence he says as the following:

The bible clearly states, whatever I want to say next, while quoting nothing

Not a single passage or book number mentioned or named.

Word salad.

Remember, all lies contain an element of truth.

He said that. Suppository without being fascias. Like getting whacked in the face with a fresh salmon.

He states the bible as truth, in spite of contradictions, translations, and the fact that every word in it was written by man. He also claims that we have no free will, and that we are corrupt from birth. Jesus is in fact not even a name, but a title. I will not accept his words and interpretations as those of God, as it paradoxically embraces that which he is arguing against. He is crafting the image of God from his perspective.

Then he props up a straw man of having sex with animals? What? Why? Then goes on to state many facts by name only, and calling out them, or they.

Name changes? God, Jehovah, Jesus?

There are no points of reference of anything he is saying, He's just moving from point to point without contextual reference.

In fact I can sum up every sentence he says as the following:

The bible clearly states, whatever I want to say next, while quoting nothing

Not a single passage or book number mentioned or named.

Word salad.

Remember, all lies contain an element of truth.

He said that. Suppository without being fascias. Like getting waked in the face with a fresh salmon.

He states the bible as truth, in spite of contradictions, translations, and the fact that every word in it was written by man. He also claims that we have no free will, and that we are corrupt from birth. Jesus is in fact not even a name, but a title. I will not accept his words and interpretations as those of God, as it paradoxically embraces that which he is arguing against. He is crafting the image of God from his perspective.

Then he props up a straw man of having sex with animals? What? Why? Then goes on to state many facts by name only, and calling out them, or they.

Name changes? God, Jehovah, Jesus?

There are no points of reference of anything he is saying, He's just moving from point to point without contextual reference.

In fact I can sum up every sentence he says as the following:

The bible clearly states, whatever I want to say next, while quoting nothing

Not a single passage or book number mentioned or named.

Word salad.