Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The problem is, okay, the press is running through some gov supercomputer/press office approving major stories on all forms of media. Hence it is sanctioned, and or removed.

What is real today?

For example okay you can bring this up. When RT was sanctioned. There was hacks reported on it and other Kremlin/Russian papers particularly of online origin. They say it was Ukrainians but that Op was bigger.

Until stuff passing through your domain, translations, or traffic, is going through the same regulators and often filters. So when another major paper or news station covers it, it's subject to what approval and propaganda and agenda if it's covered. Sometimes it is reportedly come from. Faster rewritten. Under sanction it cannot be denied.

Prior to X, Twitter started censoring all kinds of politicans. Who called that in? It caused agendas. Politically motivated. Until more started shouting fuck off and Musk rescued it.

But unless you're a national, of that domain, you've only got this other filter. It is fickle, folly, fancy, whimsical. A narrative of what it wants, hopes, and advertises. Not what the other side has to say.

Yes you can workaround to extents and limitations. VPNs, rerouting. But unless you're a native, there's often a completely different internet and media.

I have no idea, what you meant by that?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The problem is, okay, the press is running through some gov supercomputer/press office approving major stories on all forms of media. Hence it is sanctioned, and or removed.

What is real today?

For example okay you can bring this up. When RT was sanctioned. There was hacks reported on it and other Kremlin/Russian papers particularly of online origin. They say it was Ukrainians but that Op was bigger.

Until stuff passing through your domain, translations, or traffic, is going through the same regulators and often filters. So when another major paper or news station covers it, it's subject to what approval and propaganda and agenda if it's covered. Sometimes it is reportedly come from. Faster rewritten. Under sanction it cannot be denied.

Prior to X, Twitter started censoring all kinds of politicans. Who called that in? It caused agendas. Politically motivated. Until more started shouting fuck off and Musk rescued it.

But unless you're a national, of that domain, you've only got this other filter. It is fickle, folly, fancy, whimsical. A narrative of what it wants, hopes, and advertises. Not what the other side has to say.

I have no idea. What you meant by that?

1 year ago
1 score