They weren't started with a DEW.

I look at that coast and all I see is stupidity anyway.

Look at it. At what point wasn't it stupid hot, and arid dry?

The buildings that withstood the inferno were built of less ignitable materials and were closer to the coast. The trees are taller and more flame resilient than most of the buildings destroyed.

But okay the real estate. It would need complete resigning, and it ain't Florida. Further away and costs. It would be for tourism not single property owners, to generate the return costs of development. If it gets redone? As it is there is still population demanding resettlement. It would get turned into resorts and condos. If all those citizens aren't resettled and sell up.

If the government has seized it, it's to redevelop it. At what point are they corrupt, there are courts, and costs. Yes they might resale to big development, but it could be to insure modern standards, more flame resistant, better materials, and redesign are kept too Standard. Who really cares. Everything burnt. Both wealthy and ghetto.

In any disaster there will always be blame, regardless. But a DEW didn't do that. Perhaps idiots did. Perhaps there was another accelerant outside of human stupidity. Look at that background, and urbanisation? Accelerant. There are easier ways to start fires than top secret space weapons, never used on the battlefield. Instead they're only used on citizens, so government can seize their homes and add a bunch of niggers?

They weren't started with a DEW.

I look at that coast and all I see is stupidity anyway.

Look at it. At what point wasn't it stupid hot, and arid dry?

The buildings that withstood the inferno were built of less ignitable materials and were closer to the coast. The trees are taller and more flame resilient than most of the buildings destroyed.

But okay the real estate. It would need complete resigning, and it ain't Florida. Further away and costs. It would be for tourism not single property owners, to generate the return costs of development. If it gets redone? As it is there is still population demanding resettlement.

If the government has seized it, it's to redevelop it. At what point are they corrupt, there are courts, and costs. Yes they might resale to big development, but it could be to insure modern standards, more flame resistant, better materials, and redesign are kept too Standard. Who really cares. Everything burnt. Both wealthy and ghetto.

In any disaster there will always be blame, regardless. But a DEW didn't do that. Perhaps idiots did. Perhaps there was another accelerant outside of human stupidity. Look at that background, and urbanisation? Accelerant. There are easier ways to start fires than top secret space weapons, never used on the battlefield. Instead they're only used on citizens, so government can seize their homes and add a bunch of niggers?

They weren't started with a DEW.

I look at that coast and all I see is stupidity anyway.

Look at it. At what point wasn't it stupid hot, and arid dry?

The buildings that withstood the inferno were built of less ignitable materials and were closer to the coast. The trees are taller and more flame resilient than most of the buildings destroyed.

But okay the real estate. It would need complete resigning, and it ain't Florida. Further away and costs. It would be for tourism not single property owners, to generate the return costs of development. If it gets redone? As it is there is still population demanding resettlement.

If the government has seized it, it's to redevelop it. At what point are they corrupt, there are courts, and costs. Yes they might resale to big development, but it could be to insure modern standards, more flame resistant, better materials, and redesign are kept too. Who really cares. Everything burnt. Both wealthy and ghetto.

In any disaster there will always be blame, regardless. But a DEW didn't do that. Perhaps idiots did. Perhaps there was another accelerant outside of human stupidity. Look at that background, and urbanisation? Accelerant. There are easier ways to start fires than top secret space weapons, never used on the battlefield. Instead they're only used on citizens, so it can seize their homes and add a bunch of niggers?

They weren't started with a DEW.

I look at that coast and all I see is stupidity anyway.

Look at it. At what point wasn't it stupid hot, and arid dry?

The buildings that withstood the inferno were built of less ignitable materials and were closer to the coast. The trees are taller and more flame resilient than most of the buildings destroyed.

But okay the real estate. It would need complete resigning, and it ain't Florida. Further away and costs. It would be for tourism not single property owners, to generate the return costs of development. If it gets redone? As it is there is still population demanding resettlement.

If the government has seized it, it's to redevelop it. At what point are they corrupt, there are courts, and costs. Yes they might resale to big development, but it could be to insure modern standards, more flame resistant, better materials, and redesign are kept too. Who really cares. Everything burnt. Both wealthy and ghetto.

In any disaster there will always be blame, regardless. But a DEW didn't do that. Perhaps idiots did. Perhaps there was another accelerant outside of human stupidity. Look at that background, and urbanisation? Accelerant. There are easier ways to start fires than top secret space weapons, never used on the battlefield. Instead they're only used on citizens, so it can seize their homes add a bunch of niggers?

They weren't started with a DEW.

I look at that coast and all I see is stupidity anyway.

Look at it. At what point wasn't it stupid hot, and arid dry?

The buildings that withstood the inferno were built of less ignitable materials and were closer to the coast. The trees are taller and more flame resilient than most of the buildings destroyed.

But okay the real estate. It would need complete resigning and it ain't Florida. Further and costs. It would be for tourism not single property owners to generate the return costs of development. If it gets redone? As it is there is still population demanding resettlement.

If the government has seized it, it's to redevelop it. At what point are they corrupt, there are courts, costs. Yes they might resale to big development, but it could be to insure modern standards, more flame resistant, better materials, and redesign.

In any disaster there will always be blame, regardless. But a DEW didn't do that. Perhaps idiots did. Perhaps there was another accelerant outside of human stupidity. Look at that background, and urbanisation?

They weren't started with a DEW.

I look at that coast and all I see is stupidity anyway.

Look at it. At what point wasn't it stupid hot, and arid dry?

The buildings that withstood the inferno were built of less ignitable materials and were closer to the coast. The trees are taller and more flame resilient than most of the buildings destroyed.

But okay the real estate. It would need complete resigning and it ain't Florida. Further and costs. It would be for tourism not single property owners to generate the return costs of development. If it gets redone? As it is there is stil population.

If the government has seized it. It's to redevelop it, at what point are they corrupt, courts, costs. Yes they might resale to big development, but it could be to insure modern standards, more flame resistant, better materials, and redesign.

In any disaster there will always be blame, regardless. But a DEW didn't fo that. Perhaps idiots did. Perhaps there was another accelerant outside of human stupidity. Look at that background, and urbanisation?

They weren't started with a DEW.

I look at that coast and all I see is stupidity anyway.

Look at it. At what point wasn't it stupid hot, and arid dry?

The buildings that withstood the inferno were built of less ignitable materials and were closer to the coast. The trees are taller and more flame resilient than most of the buildings destroyed.

But okay the real estate. It would need complete resigning and it ain't Florida. Further and costs. It would be for tourism not single property owners to generate the return costs of development.