Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

That's not true. The goal was to have your needs met with in one neighborhood, it's very similar to the 15 min city even if people weren't restricted that was their goal to keep people in one area. On top of that we are seeing the push to get rid of single family neighborhoods along with tactics to force people into renting instead of owning with high property taxes, interest rates, inflated home values and so on. The goal is the same. Abolish private property and attempt to restrict people in one area. And of course limit the ability to be self sufficient at all / unable to live off the land. 1917-1930: First efforts, first experiments The October Revolution brought about a number of changes in Russia’s housing policies, defining its development for many years to come. Two decrees of 1918, “On Abolition of Private Property in Cities” and “On Land Socialization,” gave rise to so-called communal apartments. The state-owned property began to account for a larger share of the country’s total housing stock and construction projects; the Soviet regime also took over the task of allocating dwellings among people.... According to plan, a local resident could have spent his whole life in this neighbourhood without feeling any need for something outside of it: this place had shops, nurseries, schools, an institute with dormitories, factory, and even a crematory...[hmmm sounds so familiar].

https://www.archdaily.com/898475/100-years-of-mass-housing-in-russia

I do get that convenience can be nice. I lived in a city and miss walking to the corner to buy produce. However the push for less to no homeownership along w the 15 city idea is very similar and a commie tactic. They may change the way they implement things slightly but it's always the same goal. No home ownership, co-living, no ability to sustain ones self / dependency on the government.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

That's not true. The goal was to have your needs met with in one neighborhood, it's very similar to the 15 min city even if people weren't restricted that was their goal to keep people in one area. On top of that we are seeing the push to get rid of single family neighborhoods along with tactics to force people into renting instead of owning with high property taxes, interest rates, inflated home values and so on. The goal is the same. Abolish private property and attempt to restrict people in one area. And of course limit the ability to be self sufficient at all / unable to live off the land. 1917-1930: First efforts, first experiments The October Revolution brought about a number of changes in Russia’s housing policies, defining its development for many years to come. Two decrees of 1918, “On Abolition of Private Property in Cities” and “On Land Socialization,” gave rise to so-called communal apartments. The state-owned property began to account for a larger share of the country’s total housing stock and construction projects; the Soviet regime also took over the task of allocating dwellings among people.... According to plan, a local resident could have spent his whole life in this neighbourhood without feeling any need for something outside of it: this place had shops, nurseries, schools, an institute with dormitories, factory, and even a crematory...[hmmm sounds so familiar].

https://www.archdaily.com/898475/100-years-of-mass-housing-in-russia

I do get that convenience can be nice. I lived in a city and miss walking to the corner to buy produce. However the push for less to no homeownership along w the 15 city idea is very similar and a commie tactic. They may change the way they implement things slightly but it's always the same goal. No home ownership, co-living, no ability to sustain ones self / dependacy on the government.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

That's not true. The goal was to have your needs met with in one neighborhood, it's very similar to the 15 min city even if people weren't restricted that was their goal to keep people in one area. On top of that we are seeing the push to get rid of single family neighborhoods along with tactics to force people into renting instead of owning with high property taxes, interest rates, inflated home values and so on. The goal is the same. Abolish private property and attempt to restrict people in one area. And of course limit the ability to be self sufficient at all / unable to live off the land. 1917-1930: First efforts, first experiments The October Revolution brought about a number of changes in Russia’s housing policies, defining its development for many years to come. Two decrees of 1918, “On Abolition of Private Property in Cities” and “On Land Socialization,” gave rise to so-called communal apartments. The state-owned property began to account for a larger share of the country’s total housing stock and construction projects; the Soviet regime also took over the task of allocating dwellings among people.... According to plan, a local resident could have spent his whole life in this neighbourhood without feeling any need for something outside of it: this place had shops, nurseries, schools, an institute with dormitories, factory, and even a crematory...[hmmm sounds so familiar].

https://www.archdaily.com/898475/100-years-of-mass-housing-in-russia

I do get that convenience can be nice. I lived in a city and miss walking to the corner to buy produce. However the push to less to no homeownership along w the 15 city idea is very similar and a commie tactic. They may change the way they implement things slightly but it's always the same goal. No home ownership, co-living, no ability to sustain ones self / dependacy on the government.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

That's not true. The goal was to have your needs met with in one neighborhood, it's very similar to the 15 min city even if people weren't restricted that was their goal to keep people in one area. On top of that we are seeing the push to get rid of single family neighborhoods along with tactics to force people into renting instead of owning with high property taxes, interest rates, inflated home values and so on. The goal is the same. Abolish private property and attempt to restrict people in one area. And of course limit the ability to be self sufficient at all / unable to live off the land. 1917-1930: First efforts, first experiments The October Revolution brought about a number of changes in Russia’s housing policies, defining its development for many years to come. Two decrees of 1918, “On Abolition of Private Property in Cities” and “On Land Socialization,” gave rise to so-called communal apartments. The state-owned property began to account for a larger share of the country’s total housing stock and construction projects; the Soviet regime also took over the task of allocating dwellings among people.... According to plan, a local resident could have spent his whole life in this neighbourhood without feeling any need for something outside of it: this place had shops, nurseries, schools, an institute with dormitories, factory, and even a crematory...[hmmm sounds so familiar].

https://www.archdaily.com/898475/100-years-of-mass-housing-in-russia

I do get that convenience can be nice. I lived in a city an miss walking to the corner to buy produce. However the push to less to no homeownership along w the 15 city idea is very similar and a commie tactic. They may change the way they implement things slightly but it's always the same goal. No home ownership, co-living, no ability to sustain ones self / dependacy on the government.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

That's not true. The goal was to have your needs met with in one neighborhood, it's very similar to the 15 min city even if people weren't restricted that was their goal to keep people in one area. On top of that we are seeing the push to get rid of single family neighborhoods along with tactics to force people into renting instead of owning with high property taxes, interest rates, inflated home values and so on. The goal is the same. Abolish private property and attempt to restrict people in one area. And of course limit the ability to be self sufficient at all / unable to live off the land. 1917-1930: First efforts, first experiments The October Revolution brought about a number of changes in Russia’s housing policies, defining its development for many years to come. Two decrees of 1918, “On Abolition of Private Property in Cities” and “On Land Socialization,” gave rise to so-called communal apartments. The state-owned property began to account for a larger share of the country’s total housing stock and construction projects; the Soviet regime also took over the task of allocating dwellings among people.... According to plan, a local resident could have spent his whole life in this neighbourhood without feeling any need for something outside of it: this place had shops, nurseries, schools, an institute with dormitories, factory, and even a crematory...[hmmm sounds so familiar].

https://www.archdaily.com/898475/100-years-of-mass-housing-in-russia

I do get that convenience can be nice. I lived in a city an miss walking to the corner to buy produce. However the push to less to no homeownership along w the 15 city idea is very similar and a commie tactic. They may change the way they implement things slightly but it's always the same goal. No home ownership, co-coliving, no ability to sustain ones self / dependacy on the government.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

That's not true. The goal was to have your needs met with in one neighborhood, it's very similar to the 15 min city even if people weren't restricted that was their goal to keep people in one area. On top of that we are seeing the push to get rid of single family neighborhoods along with tactics to force people into renting instead of owning with high property taxes, interest rates, inflated home values and so on. The goal is the same. Abolish private property and attempt to restrict people in one area. And of course limit the ability to be self sufficient at all / unable to live off the land. 1917-1930: First efforts, first experiments The October Revolution brought about a number of changes in Russia’s housing policies, defining its development for many years to come. Two decrees of 1918, “On Abolition of Private Property in Cities” and “On Land Socialization,” gave rise to so-called communal apartments. The state-owned property began to account for a larger share of the country’s total housing stock and construction projects; the Soviet regime also took over the task of allocating dwellings among people.... According to plan, a local resident could have spent his whole life in this neighbourhood without feeling any need for something outside of it: this place had shops, nurseries, schools, an institute with dormitories, factory, and even a crematory...[hmmm sounds so familiar].

https://www.archdaily.com/898475/100-years-of-mass-housing-in-russia

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

That's not true. The goal was to have your needs met with in one neighborhood, it's very similar to the 15 min city even if people weren't restricted that was their goal to keep people in one area. On top of that we are seeing the push to get rid of single family neighborhoods along with tactics to force people into renting instead of owning with high property taxes, interest rates, inflated home values and so on. The goal is the same. Abolish private property and attempt to restrict people in one area. 1917-1930: First efforts, first experiments The October Revolution brought about a number of changes in Russia’s housing policies, defining its development for many years to come. Two decrees of 1918, “On Abolition of Private Property in Cities” and “On Land Socialization,” gave rise to so-called communal apartments. The state-owned property began to account for a larger share of the country’s total housing stock and construction projects; the Soviet regime also took over the task of allocating dwellings among people.... According to plan, a local resident could have spent his whole life in this neighbourhood without feeling any need for something outside of it: this place had shops, nurseries, schools, an institute with dormitories, factory, and even a crematory...[hmmm sounds so familiar].

https://www.archdaily.com/898475/100-years-of-mass-housing-in-russia

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

That's not true. The goal was to have your needs met with in one neighborhood. 1917-1930: First efforts, first experiments The October Revolution brought about a number of changes in Russia’s housing policies, defining its development for many years to come. Two decrees of 1918, “On Abolition of Private Property in Cities” and “On Land Socialization,” gave rise to so-called communal apartments. The state-owned property began to account for a larger share of the country’s total housing stock and construction projects; the Soviet regime also took over the task of allocating dwellings among people.... According to plan, a local resident could have spent his whole life in this neighbourhood without feeling any need for something outside of it: this place had shops, nurseries, schools, an institute with dormitories, factory, and even a crematory...[hmmm sounds so familiar].

https://www.archdaily.com/898475/100-years-of-mass-housing-in-russia

1 year ago
1 score