Thanks, I wasted half my time today researching about flat earth, again. Trying to tie things together. Again, im sure they are lying about something, but I dont think its earth under a glass dome. Im sorry.
You first video of course touches on god, and the second video is just lol, sounds like someone smoked a bit to much weed before going on a rant.
I believe 911 was a inside job, I believe more in these pagan religions, than the modern ones, I certainly think numbers were exaggerated in the holocaust and I dont believe we actually made it to the moon.
But flat earth? Am I supposed to ignore the years of knowledge and experiments from thousands of other people? I dont understand why a globe disproves god, I dont get it.
Even at the end of your second video. Takes him 9 minutes and 45 seconds to say, once you reach the top of the stairs.
God loves you.
One video, that doesnt involve religion as the ultimate point, is all I ask. Ive seen you and others claim that its not all about religion with flat earth, but 99% of the points I see are about that. God I wish I could believe, if he wants to send a angel down to talk to me, im down for that.
Anyway some of the shit I got into about this today.
https://www.spacecentre.nz/resources/faq/solar-system/earth/flat/structures.html
If the Earth is round, some of the largest human-made structures would have to take the Earth's curvature into account during design and construction. For smaller structures like individual buildings this wouldn't matter but for things such as very long bridges it would become an issue.
In fact it is an issue and it does happen. A well-known example is the Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge in New York. With a central span of 1,298 m (4,260 ft), it was the longest suspension bridge in the world when it was built in 1964. Its two suspension towers are 211 m (693 ft) tall and 1,298 m (4,260 ft) apart. Although each tower is vertical and perpendicular to the water, they are 41.28 mm (1 5⁄8 in) farther apart at the top than the bottom. This is due to the Earth's curvature.
If you dont understand why one had to be taller than the other its because they did not build the bridge one piece at a time, but both ends at the same time and connected them. To do this doesnt just require calculating the circumference of the earth, since its such a tiny amount, but I guess temperature can play a huge role as well. Both have to be taken in consideration.
Consider subways or atom smashers though. You can understand that being built in sections, especially over time, such as adding new lines or connections requires super pin point accuracy, curvature of the earth must be factored in for this.
https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/how-crossrail-was-affected-by-the-curvature-of-the-earth-24285/ When the current Crossrail scheme was developed in the 1990s, the planners used maps based on the Ordnance Survey National Grid reference system (BNG), but this turned out to be too crude a measure for the accuracy needed by Crossrail. It’s not that Crossrail couldn’t have been dug using it, as obviously older tunnels were dug before modern maps, but there would have been risks of misalignment and a lot more time/money would have had to be spent surveying the tunnels to make sure they pointed in the right direction. In addition, interfaces between Crossrail and existing infrastructure as owned by Network Rail and London Underground would need to fit within tighter modern engineering tolerances. Had they used normal “street maps”, then Crossrail tunnels could have been seen deviations of up to 20cm per kilometre of tunnel — due to the curvature of the earth. Maybe not a huge issue in some places, but that could have been catastrophic in central London as the Crossrail tunnels squeezed between gaps in other tube lines, sewers and modern foundations.
Atom smashers are were it gets interesting, remember how I was saying that light has a tendency to not go in a straight line, even in a vacuum? The effect is so small its not much of a concern for even large man made projects. But refraction is almost impossible to predict, so what did they do to help measure everything? They used lasers on moviing platforms in a vacuum. And flat earthers think a simple equation is enough to nullify it.
https://mathscinotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SLAC.pdf
LiCAS is based on laser straightness monitors (LSM) combined with frequency scanning interferometry (FSI) in an evacuated system. LiCAS measures both coordinates with respect to its LSM-beam and thus is suitable for geometrically straight tunnel sections. Both measurement systems will be placed on a train, which could do the reference survey autonomous or semiautonomous.
Remember, they are using lasers to level it, what they are spinning around is different particles being accelerated by magnets, you want it straight as possible because your trying to get these things up near the speed of light. Anyway.
A very high accuracy is demanded for the alignment of all accelerator components to run the linear collider successfully. The standard deviation of every component is postulated to be σl,h = 0.2mm in lateral and height over the maximum betatron wavelength (e.g. 600m). Because of the influence of refraction, this requirement can not be achieved with any open-air optical survey.
With the technique of multipoint alignment the effects of refraction can be eliminated or reduced if a mechanical structure or a laser beam in vacuum is used as straightness reference.
All this effort to get a straight line, guess it isnt as simple as it seems, huh.
Looks like they have two systems for this, although one has not been used much. I wonder why.
A stretched wire is used as a straightness reference in the GeLiS-train. This wire runs through the whole train in a closed tube to prevent influences from external forces. It is fixed at the front and rear of the train only and thus provides a straight line, when projected onto the horizontal plane.
The new one.
The LiCAS cars measure their relative position and orientation using a laser straightness monitor (LSM) and an internal FSI† system. The LSM beam is launched by the first car and accurately retro-reflected by a corner cube reflector in the last car. Each car measures the LSM beam with 4 CCD cameras. This redundantly determines transverse offsets and rotations around x and y. Six internal FSI distance measurements primarily determine the relative offset in z but are also sensitive to rotations around x and y. Rotations around z are measured by a tilt sensor (not shown). All intra-car measurements are performed in vacuum to avoid refraction problems. The position of each reference marker is measured by its car with 6 external FSI lines.
Supposedly during the nuclear testing, they had a strip of sensors in a 9000 foot long box called the "Krause-Ogle" box, the first couple times it didnt work because it did not factor in the curvature of the earth.
One thing I came across was someone using the https://welcomepei.com/getting-here/confederation-bridge/ as proof of flat earth.
But if you look into the design, youll see they just kept dropping the next pylon in and putting the next segment in, at those distances, were talking fractions of a mm at a time.
Now, I choose to believe all these people, not nasa, people, I dont know why, call me a brainwashed yuppy I guess. But if you really need convincing, I'm serious when I say lets do a gofundme and send a balloon up there and a camera with a lens of your choice.
Also dont confuse mk ultra with propaganda and mass brainwashing. Sure they may have some similarities, but mk ultra wasnt about selling you designer clothes or other shit you dont need. It was about creating soldiers who could do their job without even being aware of it.
People say its bullshit, but if you ever look into it, it makes sense. The main idea is that when people are exposed to hardcore trauma, like being in a wreck or some kind of physical trauma, or something like watching your loved one get sacrificed in front of you. Another you comes forward to take the blunt injury and spare you that, for those that cant handle it. People rarely ever remember shit after the fact.
Some people are immune to this though and I doubt they ever figured away around it.
Thanks, I wasted half my time today researching about flat earth, again. Trying to tie things together. Again, im sure they are lying about something, but I dont think its earth under a glass dome. Im sorry.
You first video of course touches on god, and the second video is just lol, sounds like someone smoked a bit to much weed before going on a rant.
I believe 911 was a inside job, I believe more in these pagan religions, than the modern ones, I certainly think numbers were exaggerated in the holocaust and I dont believe we actually made it to the moon.
But flat earth? Am I supposed to ignore the years of knowledge and experiments from thousands of other people? I dont understand why a globe disproves god, I dont get it.
Even at the end of your second video. Takes him 9 minutes and 45 seconds to say, once you reach the top of the stairs.
God loves you.
One video, that doesnt involve religion as the ultimate point, is all I ask. Ive seen you and others claim that its not all about religion with flat earth, but 99% of the points I see are about that. God I wish I could believe, if he wants to send a angel down to talk to me, im down for that.
Anyway some of the shit I got into about this today.
https://www.spacecentre.nz/resources/faq/solar-system/earth/flat/structures.html
If the Earth is round, some of the largest human-made structures would have to take the Earth's curvature into account during design and construction. For smaller structures like individual buildings this wouldn't matter but for things such as very long bridges it would become an issue.
In fact it is an issue and it does happen. A well-known example is the Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge in New York. With a central span of 1,298 m (4,260 ft), it was the longest suspension bridge in the world when it was built in 1964. Its two suspension towers are 211 m (693 ft) tall and 1,298 m (4,260 ft) apart. Although each tower is vertical and perpendicular to the water, they are 41.28 mm (1 5⁄8 in) farther apart at the top than the bottom. This is due to the Earth's curvature.
If you dont understand why one had to be taller than the other its because they did not build the bridge one piece at a time, but both ends at the same time and connected them. To do this doesnt just require calculating the circumference of the earth, since its such a tiny amount, but I guess temperature can play a huge role as well. Both have to be taken in consideration.
Consider subways or atom smashers though. You can understand that being built in sections, especially over time, such as adding new lines or connections requires super pin point accuracy, curvature of the earth must be factored in for this.
https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/how-crossrail-was-affected-by-the-curvature-of-the-earth-24285/ When the current Crossrail scheme was developed in the 1990s, the planners used maps based on the Ordnance Survey National Grid reference system (BNG), but this turned out to be too crude a measure for the accuracy needed by Crossrail. It’s not that Crossrail couldn’t have been dug using it, as obviously older tunnels were dug before modern maps, but there would have been risks of misalignment and a lot more time/money would have had to be spent surveying the tunnels to make sure they pointed in the right direction. In addition, interfaces between Crossrail and existing infrastructure as owned by Network Rail and London Underground would need to fit within tighter modern engineering tolerances. Had they used normal “street maps”, then Crossrail tunnels could have been seen deviations of up to 20cm per kilometre of tunnel — due to the curvature of the earth. Maybe not a huge issue in some places, but that could have been catastrophic in central London as the Crossrail tunnels squeezed between gaps in other tube lines, sewers and modern foundations.
Atom smashers are were it gets interesting, remember how I was saying that light has a tendency to not go in a straight line, even in a vacuum? The effect is so small its not much of a concern for even large man made projects. But refraction is almost impossible to predict, so what did they do to help measure everything? They used lasers on moviing platforms in a vacuum. And flat earthers think a simple equation is enough to nullify it.
https://mathscinotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SLAC.pdf
LiCAS is based on laser straightness monitors (LSM) combined with frequency scanning interferometry (FSI) in an evacuated system. LiCAS measures both coordinates with respect to its LSM-beam and thus is suitable for geometrically straight tunnel sections. Both measurement systems will be placed on a train, which could do the reference survey autonomous or semiautonomous.
Remember, they are using lasers to level it, what they are spinning around is electrons being accelerated by magnets, you want it straight as possible because your trying to get these things up near the speed of light. Anyway.
A very high accuracy is demanded for the alignment of all accelerator components to run the linear collider successfully. The standard deviation of every component is postulated to be σl,h = 0.2mm in lateral and height over the maximum betatron wavelength (e.g. 600m). Because of the influence of refraction, this requirement can not be achieved with any open-air optical survey.
With the technique of multipoint alignment the effects of refraction can be eliminated or reduced if a mechanical structure or a laser beam in vacuum is used as straightness reference.
All this effort to get a straight line, guess it isnt as simple as it seems, huh.
Looks like they have two systems for this, although one has not been used much. I wonder why.
A stretched wire is used as a straightness reference in the GeLiS-train. This wire runs through the whole train in a closed tube to prevent influences from external forces. It is fixed at the front and rear of the train only and thus provides a straight line, when projected onto the horizontal plane.
The new one.
The LiCAS cars measure their relative position and orientation using a laser straightness monitor (LSM) and an internal FSI† system. The LSM beam is launched by the first car and accurately retro-reflected by a corner cube reflector in the last car. Each car measures the LSM beam with 4 CCD cameras. This redundantly determines transverse offsets and rotations around x and y. Six internal FSI distance measurements primarily determine the relative offset in z but are also sensitive to rotations around x and y. Rotations around z are measured by a tilt sensor (not shown). All intra-car measurements are performed in vacuum to avoid refraction problems. The position of each reference marker is measured by its car with 6 external FSI lines.
Supposedly during the nuclear testing, they had a strip of sensors in a 9000 foot long box called the "Krause-Ogle" box, the first couple times it didnt work because it did not factor in the curvature of the earth.
One thing I came across was someone using the https://welcomepei.com/getting-here/confederation-bridge/ as proof of flat earth.
But if you look into the design, youll see they just kept dropping the next pylon in and putting the next segment in, at those distances, were talking fractions of a mm at a time.
Now, I choose to believe all these people, not nasa, people, I dont know why, call me a brainwashed yuppy I guess. But if you really need convincing, I'm serious when I say lets do a gofundme and send a balloon up there and a camera with a lens of your choice.
Also dont confuse mk ultra with propaganda and mass brainwashing. Sure they may have some similarities, but mk ultra wasnt about selling you designer clothes or other shit you dont need. It was about creating soldiers who could do their job without even being aware of it.
People say its bullshit, but if you ever look into it, it makes sense. The main idea is that when people are exposed to hardcore trauma, like being in a wreck or some kind of physical trauma, or something like watching your loved one get sacrificed in front of you. Another you comes forward to take the blunt injury and spare you that, for those that cant handle it. People rarely ever remember shit after the fact.
Some people are immune to this though and I doubt they ever figured away around it.
Thanks, I wasted half my time today researching about flat earth, again. Trying to tie things together. Again, im sure they are lying about something, but I dont think its earth under a glass dome. Im sorry.
You first video of course touches on god, and the second video is just lol, sounds like someone smoked a bit to much weed before going on a rant.
I believe 911 was a inside job, I believe more in these pagan religions, than the modern ones, I certainly think numbers were exaggerated in the holocaust and I dont believe we actually made it to the moon.
But flat earth? Am I supposed to ignore the years of knowledge and experiments from thousands of other people? I dont understand why a globe disproves god, I dont get it.
Even at the end of your second video. Takes him 9 minutes and 45 seconds to say, once you reach the top of the stairs.
God loves you.
One video, that doesnt involve religion as the ultimate point, is all I ask. Ive seen you and others claim that its not all about religion with flat earth, but 99% of the points I see are about that. God I wish I could believe, if he wants to send a angel down to talk to me, im down for that.
Anyway some of the shit I got into about this today.
https://www.spacecentre.nz/resources/faq/solar-system/earth/flat/structures.html
If the Earth is round, some of the largest human-made structures would have to take the Earth's curvature into account during design and construction. For smaller structures like individual buildings this wouldn't matter but for things such as very long bridges it would become an issue.
In fact it is an issue and it does happen. A well-known example is the Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge in New York. With a central span of 1,298 m (4,260 ft), it was the longest suspension bridge in the world when it was built in 1964. Its two suspension towers are 211 m (693 ft) tall and 1,298 m (4,260 ft) apart. Although each tower is vertical and perpendicular to the water, they are 41.28 mm (1 5⁄8 in) farther apart at the top than the bottom. This is due to the Earth's curvature.
If you dont understand why one had to be taller than the other its because they did not build the bridge one piece at a time, but both ends at the same time and connected them. To do this doesnt just require calculating the circumference of the earth, since its such a tiny amount, but I guess temperature can play a huge role as well. Both have to be taken in consideration.
Consider subways or atom smashers though. You can understand that being built in sections, especially over time, such as adding new lines or connections requires super pin point accuracy, curvature of the earth must be factored in for this.
https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/how-crossrail-was-affected-by-the-curvature-of-the-earth-24285/ When the current Crossrail scheme was developed in the 1990s, the planners used maps based on the Ordnance Survey National Grid reference system (BNG), but this turned out to be too crude a measure for the accuracy needed by Crossrail. It’s not that Crossrail couldn’t have been dug using it, as obviously older tunnels were dug before modern maps, but there would have been risks of misalignment and a lot more time/money would have had to be spent surveying the tunnels to make sure they pointed in the right direction. In addition, interfaces between Crossrail and existing infrastructure as owned by Network Rail and London Underground would need to fit within tighter modern engineering tolerances. Had they used normal “street maps”, then Crossrail tunnels could have been seen deviations of up to 20cm per kilometre of tunnel — due to the curvature of the earth. Maybe not a huge issue in some places, but that could have been catastrophic in central London as the Crossrail tunnels squeezed between gaps in other tube lines, sewers and modern foundations.
Atom smashers are were it gets interesting, remember how I was saying that light has a tendency to not go in a straight line, even in a vacuum? The effect is so small its not much of a concern for even large man made projects. But refraction is almost impossible to predict, so what did they do to help measure everything? They used lasers on moviing platforms in a vacuum. And flat earthers think a simple equation is enough to nullify it.
https://mathscinotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SLAC.pdf
LiCAS is based on laser straightness monitors (LSM) combined with frequency scanning interferometry (FSI) in an evacuated system. LiCAS measures both coordinates with respect to its LSM-beam and thus is suitable for geometrically straight tunnel sections. Both measurement systems will be placed on a train, which could do the reference survey autonomous or semiautonomous.
Remember, they are using lasers to level it, what they are spinning around is electrons being accelerated by magnets, you want it straight as possible because your trying to get these things up near the speed of light. Anyway.
A very high accuracy is demanded for the alignment of all accelerator components to run the linear collider successfully. The standard deviation of every component is postulated to be σl,h = 0.2mm in lateral and height over the maximum betatron wavelength (e.g. 600m). Because of the influence of refraction, this requirement can not be achieved with any open-air optical survey.
With the technique of multipoint alignment the effects of refraction can be eliminated or reduced if a mechanical structure or a laser beam in vacuum is used as straightness reference.
All this effort to get a straight line, guess it isnt as simple as it seems, huh.
Looks like they have two systems for this, although one has not been used much. I wonder why.
A stretched wire is used as a straightness reference in the GeLiS-train. This wire runs through the whole train in a closed tube to prevent influences from external forces. It is fixed at the front and rear of the train only and thus provides a straight line, when projected onto the horizontal plane.
The new one.
The LiCAS cars measure their relative position and orientation using a laser straightness monitor (LSM) and an internal FSI† system. The LSM beam is launched by the first car and accurately retro-reflected by a corner cube reflector in the last car. Each car measures the LSM beam with 4 CCD cameras. This redundantly determines transverse offsets and rotations around x and y. Six internal FSI distance measurements primarily determine the relative offset in z but are also sensitive to rotations around x and y. Rotations around z are measured by a tilt sensor (not shown). All intra-car measurements are performed in vacuum to avoid refraction problems. The position of each reference marker is measured by its car with 6 external FSI lines.
Supposedly during the nuclear testing, they had a strip of sensors in a 9000 foot long box called the "Krause-Ogle" box, the first couple times it didnt work because it did not factor in the curvature of the earth.
One thing I came across was someone using the https://welcomepei.com/getting-here/confederation-bridge/ as proof of flat earth.
But if you look into the design, youll see they just kept dropping the next pylon in and putting the next segment in, at those distances, were talking fractions of a mm at a time.
Now, I choose to believe all these people, not nasa, people, I dont know why, call me a brainwashed yuppy I guess. But if you really need convincing, I'm serious when I say lets do a gofundme and send a balloon up there and a camera with a lens of your choice.
Also dont confuse mk ultra with propaganda and mass brainwashing. Sure they may have some similarities, but mk ultra wasnt about selling you designer clothes or other shit you dont need. It was about creating soldiers who could do their job without even being aware of it.
People say its bullshit, but if you ever look into it, it makes sense. The main idea is that when people are exposed to hardcore trauma, like being in a wreck or some kind of physical trauma, or something like watching your loved one get sacrificed in front of you. Another you comes forward to take the blunt injury and spare you that, for those that cant handle it. People rarely every remember shit after the fact.
Some people are immune to this though and I doubt they ever figured away around it.
Thanks, I wasted half my time today researching about flat earth, again. Trying to tie things together. Again, im sure they are lying about something, but I dont think its earth under a glass dome. Im sorry.
You first video of course touches on god, and the second video is just lol, sounds like someone smoked a bit to much weed before going on a rant.
I believe 911 was a inside job, I believe more in these pagan religions, than the modern ones, I certainly think numbers were exaggerated in the holocaust and I dont believe we actually made it to the moon.
But flat earth? Am I supposed to ignore the years of knowledge and experiments from thousands of other people? I dont understand why a globe disproves god, I dont get it.
Even at the end of your second video. Takes him 9 minutes and 45 seconds to say, once you reach the top of the stairs.
God loves you.
One video, that doesnt involve religion as the ultimate point, is all I ask. Ive seen you and others claim that its not all about religion with flat earth, but 99% of the points I see are about that. God I wish I could believe, if he wants to send a angel down to talk to me, im down for that.
Anyway some of the shit I got into about this today.
https://www.spacecentre.nz/resources/faq/solar-system/earth/flat/structures.html
If the Earth is round, some of the largest human-made structures would have to take the Earth's curvature into account during design and construction. For smaller structures like individual buildings this wouldn't matter but for things such as very long bridges it would become an issue.
In fact it is an issue and it does happen. A well-known example is the Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge in New York. With a central span of 1,298 m (4,260 ft), it was the longest suspension bridge in the world when it was built in 1964. Its two suspension towers are 211 m (693 ft) tall and 1,298 m (4,260 ft) apart. Although each tower is vertical and perpendicular to the water, they are 41.28 mm (1 5⁄8 in) farther apart at the top than the bottom. This is due to the Earth's curvature.
If you dont understand why one had to be taller than the other its because they did not build the bridge one piece at a time, but both ends at the same time and connected them. To do this doesnt just require calculating the circumference of the earth, since its such a tiny amount, but I guess temperature can play a huge role as well. Both have to be taken in consideration.
Consider subways or atom smashers though. You can understand that being built in sections, especially over time, such as adding new lines or connections requires super pin point accuracy, curvature of the earth must be factored in for this.
https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/how-crossrail-was-affected-by-the-curvature-of-the-earth-24285/ When the current Crossrail scheme was developed in the 1990s, the planners used maps based on the Ordnance Survey National Grid reference system (BNG), but this turned out to be too crude a measure for the accuracy needed by Crossrail. It’s not that Crossrail couldn’t have been dug using it, as obviously older tunnels were dug before modern maps, but there would have been risks of misalignment and a lot more time/money would have had to be spent surveying the tunnels to make sure they pointed in the right direction. In addition, interfaces between Crossrail and existing infrastructure as owned by Network Rail and London Underground would need to fit within tighter modern engineering tolerances. Had they used normal “street maps”, then Crossrail tunnels could have been seen deviations of up to 20cm per kilometre of tunnel — due to the curvature of the earth. Maybe not a huge issue in some places, but that could have been catastrophic in central London as the Crossrail tunnels squeezed between gaps in other tube lines, sewers and modern foundations.
Atom smashers are were it gets interesting, remember how I was saying that light has a tendency to not go in a straight line, even in a vacuum? The effect is so small its not much of a concern for even large man made projects. But refraction is almost impossible to predict, so what did they do to help measure everything? They used lasers on floating platforms in a vacuum. And flat earthers think a simple equation is enough to nullify it.
https://mathscinotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SLAC.pdf
LiCAS is based on laser straightness monitors (LSM) combined with frequency scanning interferometry (FSI) in an evacuated system. LiCAS measures both coordinates with respect to its LSM-beam and thus is suitable for geometrically straight tunnel sections. Both measurement systems will be placed on a train, which could do the reference survey autonomous or semiautonomous.
Remember, they are using lasers to level it, what they are spinning around is electrons being accelerated by magnets, you want it straight as possible because your trying to get these things up to the speed of light. Anyway.
A very high accuracy is demanded for the alignment of all accelerator components to run the linear collider successfully. The standard deviation of every component is postulated to be σl,h = 0.2mm in lateral and height over the maximum betatron wavelength (e.g. 600m). Because of the influence of refraction, this requirement can not be achieved with any open-air optical survey.
With the technique of multipoint alignment the effects of refraction can be eliminated or reduced if a mechanical structure or a laser beam in vacuum is used as straightness reference.
All this effort to get a straight line, guess it isnt as simple as it seems, huh.
Looks like they have two systems for this, although one has not been used much. I wonder why.
A stretched wire is used as a straightness reference in the GeLiS-train. This wire runs through the whole train in a closed tube to prevent influences from external forces. It is fixed at the front and rear of the train only and thus provides a straight line, when projected onto the horizontal plane.
The new one.
The LiCAS cars measure their relative position and orientation using a laser straightness monitor (LSM) and an internal FSI† system. The LSM beam is launched by the first car and accurately retro-reflected by a corner cube reflector in the last car. Each car measures the LSM beam with 4 CCD cameras. This redundantly determines transverse offsets and rotations around x and y. Six internal FSI distance measurements primarily determine the relative offset in z but are also sensitive to rotations around x and y. Rotations around z are measured by a tilt sensor (not shown). All intra-car measurements are performed in vacuum to avoid refraction problems. The position of each reference marker is measured by its car with 6 external FSI lines.
Supposedly during the nuclear testing, they had a strip of sensors in a 9000 foot long box called the "Krause-Ogle" box, the first couple times it didnt work because it did not factor in the curvature of the earth.
One thing I came across was someone using the https://welcomepei.com/getting-here/confederation-bridge/ as proof of flat earth.
But if you look into the design, youll see they just kept dropping the next pylon in and putting the next segment in, at those distances, were talking fractions of a mm at a time.
Now, I choose to believe all these people, not nasa, people, I dont know why, call me a brainwashed yuppy I guess. But if you really need convincing, I'm serious when I say lets do a gofundme and send a balloon up there and a camera with a lens of your choice.
Also dont confuse mk ultra with propaganda and mass brainwashing. Sure they may have some similarities, but mk ultra wasnt about selling you designer clothes or other shit you dont need. It was about creating soldiers who could do their job without even being aware of it.
People say its bullshit, but if you ever look into it, it makes sense. The main idea is that when people are exposed to hardcore trauma, like being in a wreck or some kind of physical trauma, or something like watching your loved one get sacrificed in front of you. Another you comes forward to take the blunt injury and spare you that, for those that cant handle it. People rarely every remember shit after the fact.
Some people are immune to this though and I doubt they ever figured away around it.