No. Sorry both sides use propaganda. Both have reasons.

It is finding the reason. Objectively. Not listening to bleeding hearts propaganda. Trust no one.

I am inclined not to believe either objectively.

Last year Kherson was in Russian hands it was moving forward to Odessa or at least the next city above Kherson, some name I don't want to look up, Mykol whatever. That dynamic changed on withdrawal. Russia blew out the connecting bridge on retreat. Where Ukraine then had attacked the dam. Now the bridge is destroyed and so is the dam.

Accurately was the hydro powerstation in use. No, the odds are it wasn't to any degree. Problematical it's war, but no excuse for preventing catastrophe. So it suggests there is probability for Russian causality. Accidentally or not. It was expected because of the known risk.

Currently Ukraine's offensive has gone shit, although there is still fighting in Donetsk and etc. But the press today is reading of lies. They hadn't started their counteroffensive. Nato suggesting its troops might be deployed. Talks of F16s being sent, prior to the supposed months of training. It suggests what? Ukraine are full of bananas.

It is possible they created this incident to gain further support. They do shit like it.

But come on. I'm not getting into banana throwing. It served a purpose. Now who is to blame and why?

No. Sorry both sides use propaganda. Both have reasons.

It is finding the reason. Objectively. Not listening to bleeding hearts propaganda. Trust no one.

I am inclined not to believe either objectively.

Last year Kherson was in Russian hands it was moving forward to Odessa or at least the next city above Kherson, some name I don't want to look up, Mykol whatever. That dynamic changed on withdrawal. Russia blew out the connecting bridge on retreat. Where Ukraine then had attacked the dam. Now the bridge is destroyed and so is the dam.

Accurately was the hydro powerstation in use. No, the odds are it wasn't to any degree. Problematical it's war, but no excuse for preventing catastrophe. So it suggests there is probability for Russian causality. Accidentally or not. It was expected because of the known risk.

Currently Ukraine's offensive has gone shit although there is still fighting in Donetsk and etc. But the press today is reading of lies. They hadn't started their counteroffensive. Nato suggesting its troops might be deployed. Talks of F16s being sent, prior to the supposed months of training. It suggests what? Ukraine are full of bananas.

It is possible they created this incident to gain further support. They do shit like it.

But come on. I'm not getting into banana throwing. It served a purpose. Now who is to blame and why?