Although I do think the world is flat, this post wasn't meant to prove that. It was simply another example of NASA offering zero evidence that anything they do is real. You try to defend the need for composite images, but why would this be necessary when one of the many space probes could have taken high def video as it orbited that planet? Those origional images also look like photoshop productions, and watercolors bled together to create the clouds.
As far as the bickering, tallestshills job is to inhibit discussion with his idiotic comments.
As a side note, proving the earth is a plane is difficult if you don't have a NASA/military budget to work with. But it is rather easy to prove its not a sphere of 21,600 nautical miles in circumference. All you have to do is view objects far beyond would should be geometrically possible, which has been well documented. Try proving that water conforms to a globe, when it clearly seeks to be flat and level in whatever contains it. Below is a compilation.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbsRfA1jEZsHFDJ3JJNeQkkB
Although I do think the world is flat, this post wasn't meant to prove that. It was simply another example of NASA offering zero evidence that anything they do is real. You try to defend the need for composite images, but why would this be necessary when one of the many space probes could have taken high def video as it orbited that planet? Those origional images also look like photoshop productions, and watercolors bled together to create the clouds.
As far as the bickering, tallestshills job is to inhibit discussion with his idiotic comments.
As a side note, proving the earth is a plane is difficult if you don't have a NASA/military budget to work with. But it is rather easy to prove its not a sphere of 21,600 nautical miles in circumference. All you have to do is view objects far beyond would should be geometrically possible, which has been well documented. Try proving that water conforms to a globe, when it clearly speaks to be flat and level in whatever contains it. Below is a compilation.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbsRfA1jEZsHFDJ3JJNeQkkB
Although I do think the world is flat, this post wasn't meant to prove that. It was simply another example of NASA offering zero evidence that anything they do is real. You try to defend the need for composite images, but why would this be necessary when one of the many space probes could have taken high def video as it orbited that planet? Those origional images also look like photoshop productions, and watercolors bled together to create the clouds.
As far as the bickering, tallestshills job is to inhibit discussion with his idiotic comments.
As a side note, proving the earth is a plane is difficult if you don't have a NASA/military budget to work with. But it is rather easy to prove its not a sphere of 21,600 nautical miles in circumference. All you have to do is view objects far beyond would should be geometrically possible, which has been well documented. Below is a compilation.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzivhxtxgbsRfA1jEZsHFDJ3JJNeQkkB